- 11,163
- 17,721
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2012
well said.It's context my friend. context.
Sometimes a viewpoint that is not explicitly racist may be construed as such.
There's a difference between someone throwing around the N word or speaking about an ethnic group in a hateful and inflammatory manner and someone voicing a legitimate stance.
I may not agree with an individual's opinion but I will defend their right to voice their opinion (if viewpoint is a legitimate stance on an issue and done so in a tasteful and retrained manner),
This is America, people have a right to speak out even if someone else doesn't agree with the message. Hate speech isn't protected by the constitution and people should be held accountable for spewing it. But actual legitimate opinions, however controversial or unpopular, should be allowed to be expressed without people fearing persecution or backlash.
Again this has the propensity to turn into a witch hunt.
the intent behind this is what gets to me too.
is something like this really being used to better things or is it being used to settle scores?
we all knew that tattletail kid in school who would get you in trouble for the most pettiest things that had no effect on him. he didn't do it to help the teacher but rather to get people in trouble. i could easily see something like this being exploited.
hell the case mentioned in an earlier post where some girls spiteful ex bf made a fake page of her and was saying wild racist stuff. people were trying to get her fired from her job even though it wasn't her that said that stuff.