- Dec 14, 2004
- 60,034
- 50,948
Y'all arguing with a child that thinks BIG was trash and Drake and Wayne are the best.....think about that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm good on reading it. I read it every day in here.
Culture vulture, white America, the machine, white people did it, cry, cry [emoji]128546[/emoji][emoji]128546[/emoji][emoji]128546[/emoji]
****** sound sad man. Bunch on angry disgruntled ppl is what it sounds like
Example
Artist that NT likes wins Grammy = he deserves it, good for him, Grammys finally got it right for a change
Artist that NT don't like wins Grammy = see white America, machine etc above. **** is corny. If you gon cry about it all day don't watch the award show, don't talk sales or numbers then. Every sale or number should be embellished then if you gonna pull out the machine card whenever you want
Sage Steele, that you?
Y'all arguing with a child that thinks BIG was trash and Drake and Wayne are the best.....think about that.
I've personally have always felt it was weird that people used something as opinionated as music, then try and say that it's competitive / a sport.
How? What's funny is that, other than sales, there's no real way to crown a champion. There's no rubric to getting W's and L's.
I could right now say No Frauds > shether and it would be just as valid as the opposite. Everyone is in agreement that Sales don't make someone better, so what does?
For the record I agree that sales don't make a rapper better than the other, but that's precisely why I don't consider rap or music at all as a sport.
Sage Steele, that you?
I've personally have always felt it was weird that people used something as opinionated as music, then try and say that it's competitive / a sport.
How? What's funny is that, other than sales, there's no real way to crown a champion. There's no rubric to getting W's and L's.
I could right now say No Frauds > shether and it would be just as valid as the opposite. Everyone is in agreement that Sales don't make someone better, so what does?
For the record I agree that sales don't make a rapper better than the other, but that's precisely why I don't consider rap or music at all as a sport.
Because rap was about being the best, not who sold the most records.
When you first start rapping. You're trying to be the best on your block. In your school. In your city.
If you can't equate it to a sport, it's because of the generation you grew up in and because now it's not about trying to be the best emcee. Lil Uzi Vert isn't trying to be the best rapper. Lil Yachty isn't trying to be the best rapper. If Young Thug did a song with Pusha T, he's not trying to out rap him. When Nature did Banned From TV do you think he wanted to out rap Nas or Pun or just be on a song with them? You don't think Jay and Big weren't trying to have the best or wittiest verse on Young G's or BK's Finest? Meth will tell you about **** The World.
Rap used to be competitive.
Negative. That is a wrong opinion. The metrics are set by precedence that people can usually agree on and that's how you can choose winners and losers.
For the record I agree that sales don't make a rapper better than the other, but that's precisely why I don't consider rap or music at all as a sport.
The generation I grew up in? Give me a break. I'm not debating that rappers try to be best when they rap. That doesn't make it a competitive sport, that's a fallacy.
Again, of rap is this competitive sport how do you determine who's the best
competitiveness in rap is deep rooted in a crab in a bucket mentaility. For it to be a sport, someone has to lose, period and that can't happen in music.
This isn't a generational thing
Word, what's the metric lol?
What
It is a generation thing
So if I'm trying to be the best basketball player in the hood that's rooted in a crab in the bucket mentality?
You young dudes are really ****** up raps legacy. Ya'll don't even know it's history and could care less about it.
Rap precedence that people can somewhat agree on.
That's your view and that's cool but hip hop has always been competitive, that's just a fact. From the 80's to about when the BFF era started and every now and then that competitiveness still comes out.
Yeah music is subjective but hip hop culture has always been like a sport or competition. And a lot of people just don't understand this culture.
What's the precedence fan since my opinion was wrong lol
If you go back and look at what people consider elite diss records you can use those as base line to judge contemporary disses. People was pretty much doing that in the first half of this thread.
Literally in this exact thread ppl were debating about who won NaSty NaS and Hov. Like over a decade afterwards people still don't know who won because there is no concrete rubric for music. It's subjective.
There is no set of agreed upon standards for music.
Literally in this exact thread ppl were debating about who won NaSty NaS and Hov. Like over a decade afterwards people still don't know who won because there is no concrete rubric for music. It's subjective.
There is no set of agreed upon standards for music.
The difference is you can prove who's the best basketball player in the hood
You can't do that with rap no matter what generational label you want to throw on this.
Again, how do I go about determining winners and losers in music?
The debate is about who won. But it is generally accepted that both are great diss records in their own right.
So knowing that one can judge other diss other records. If tracks like Hit Em Up, No Vaseline, Takeover, and Ether are the standards then you have a bar and you can judge diss tracks that come after.
So anyone older than you who grew up in the 70's and 80's will say otherwise, but you're going to tell people who participated in the culture before you how it was and what rap was based on?
You have some balls on you
No wonder people think Elvis and The Beatles invented rock music.