RIP George Floyd

Earlier, I posted about my company having an all employee townhall meeting. Not all of these questions/comments were read. WOW.

They sent us a transcript of all the questions/comments that were made in the meetings:

“I am incredibly frustrated by the tone, content, responses, and structure of this call.“

To white people - going to every black person you know to apologize is not enough... honestly we may not really care too much for your white tears - use your privielge to speak to your family, freinds, partners - post on social media, start dialogue with the white people you know, create conversations with them. What are you doing on a personal level when people of color, black people are not around or present.

Habitat needs to be courageous and take a stand. This harkens back to our roots. Saying Black Lives Matter is not enough. We need to say more, do more.

How is Habitat planning to publicly lift up and center black voices at this time? What actions will Habitat commit to long-term to address the ways we (consciously and unconsciously) perpetuate systemic racial injustice and white supremacy?

Does Habitat plan to provide additional time off for staff who want to participate in peaceful protests AND/OR who simply need emotional rest?

I am pleased to hear that Habitat is working on diversity and inclusion plans. I have sat on teams where person after person hired has been white, and I have been the only person of color on my team. I would also recommend that there is more transparency in salary ranges to ensure that salaries are based on the duties associated with the position and are equitable across race and gender. It has appeared in the past that some people who are newly hired and with less experience have been paid more than those of color in similar positions. Once we are in a more secure situation, are their plans in place to evaluate salaries to make sure they are fair and are their plans to make general salary ranges available for position families?

Much like how we believe housing is foundational for forging a path out of poverty, violence toward African Americans who represent a significant portion of the people we serve in the US undermines the value of the work we do. What good is housing if this violence and deep seeded racial inequality continues? We are accountable to the people we serve and to operate with integrity and courage to make a stand with them. Habitat was birthed out of racial equality, we stood for that then and we stand for it now. We must continue to adapt this same voice to a changing environment. How does HFHI expect to do that?

I would like Habitat to acknowled the ways we fall short in empowering and uplifting its black staff. And once acknowledged, how can we do this better?

Dr. Martin Luther King said "We must recognize that we can't solve our problem now until there is a radical redistribution of economic and political power." In Memphis, just before he was killed, he said "the whole structure of American life must be changed." In this short time, we have seen the whole structure of American life change. The pandemic has shined a glaring spotlight on the problem. How can we be an active, forceful part of the solution, bringing people together to bring HOPE? Can we be louder on the need for equity?

Comment: I think we also need to acknowledge that as upsetting, sad, outraging, infurtating as all this is, our brothers and sisters who are people of color have been dealing with all these emotions (and more) for +400 years. I can't even imagine their emotional burden. Let's make this 100% about people of color by not dominating the conversation with what white people are feeling right now. It's also important but white people ought to be leveraging priviledge to amplify voices of POC by not talking about ourselves.

I live in Houston, TX. My heart hurts anytime a person of color is senselessly killed, but this hits home. I have personally rubbed shoulders with George Floyd at various social outings. I am not OKAY and I cannot fake a smile anywhere, let alone at work. How is Habitat, as an organization, supporting employees who are simply traumarized and emotionally tired.

Does Habitat plan to specifically denounce police brutality?

Comment: Participating in Black Out Tuesday is not meaningful action. While these posts may be well-intended, several activists and influencers have pointed out that posting a blank black image with a bunch of tags clogs up critical channels of information and updates. It comes across as an empty gesture

this is a comment - please understand and take accountablity for the fact that the answer "We don't know...it will take some time to figure out" is the same excuse that has been used for the past 3 years in regards to the diversity & inclusion agenda at Habitat. ERG's are not enough, as person of color I'm tired of talking - we can figure out a strategic plans in a month, we can create a new job position within a few weeks with no funding - but in regards to race we still don't really know? We can't believe what you say and we dont see what you do.

Mental health is a valid reason to use sick leave

Managers need to be held accountable to their black staff. Regularly checking in to see if they have a need that hasn't been met and not just when we have a George Floyd incident, but regularly doing this to ensure DEI is being accomplished.

There is a history of silence in Habitat when crisis or flashpoint related to race happen in US. Some of your colleagues have directly experienced a death similar to George Floyd and those national headline incidents were not acknowledged by Habitat.

Time and time again, we ask people to share their stories and open up wounds for the sake of teaching others in the organization. To what end? What is the plan? Where are the organization's actionable items?

How do we balance the need to leverage this horrific tragedy for the social changes we all know need to occur in this country (and world) while ensuring additional innocent lives are not lost by the collateral damage of our collective outrage and despair? What responsibility do we accept as a ministry to drive critical social changes while not inadvertently stoking the fires that still burn in cities across the country?

Is there any plan to make our leadership team more diverse ? I konw we have done some work, but the reality is Habitat does not look like the families we serve. For instance, what about hiring someone to focus on Diversity and Inclusion? Adrienne shouldnl't be the only senior leader who can speak from a black perspective.

What's the "real" reason why we aren't more bold with our external messaging and leveraging our brand to ignite more conversations in our sector? We've have fallen short yet again...

With response saying "housing for' everyone'" feels dilluted and a bit detracting around what we know about housing and race and opportunity - like 'all lives matter' vs 'black lives matter'. and individual introspection is important - but how are our leaders and network willing to call our impact on POC? how can we say our approach and model is meant to redress redlining? how can we say our policy and adv work is meant to dismantle racist systems? that cant be done individually. that requires naming it and giving stronger direction and prioritization from Habitat's leaders

In my role, I visit a lot of different Habitat builds and meet with a lot of volunteers and affilaite staff. More than a handful of times, I have heard volunteers and sometimes affiliate staff say things that they clearly don't realize are offensive and stem from racism. For example, referring to a Black homeowner or staff person as "so articulate." While I feel personally okay speaking up, I do not know how I should do this while also representing HFHI. I'd love more official guidance on how to deal with these situations.

I have heard many comments regarding leaders being uncomfortable to speak about racial issues. Our work uses images of black and brown people freely and is responsible for addressing these issues and not cherry picking

Apart from building communities and bringing races together through the work that we do for the world to see, how is Habitat planning to shift the paradigm internally and ensure that race is not used to perpretuate stereotypes, for example, how often we showcase black donors instead of just showcasing black homeowners in our social media, the way we present our work, perpetuates the racial divide if we don't change our culture internally and seek activelly to identify our own biases.

What are the accountability measures to affiliates if its found they are practicing bias/racist practices? What pathway do the black employees/homewoners have to voice their concerns. If the leadership is more than 90% white how do we acount for those power dynamics? We heard an example from black employees t an affiliate who weren't egtting better fixtures, even though they were in the budget becaue as the affiliate leader said "they are getting a house anyway". How is that person still an affiliate leader? What weight do we give the ability to bring in donors over bad behavior.

Very disappointing so far..

When we talk about external consultants and vendors, I think an action step we could take is to invest in vendors who also support diversity and equity in their staffing. I recently went through a training and when I checked out the company's website, it was all white faces. Something is wrong that in 2020, this vendor did not appear to have any Black or brown leaders. Let's stop spending our money with these vendors.

This is a lot of talk and numbers without having clearly defined the problem explicitly within HFHI.(As a DE&I instructor and long-time Habitat employee, I'm personally frustrated that we (HFHI) haven't adequately named the white privelege problem that exists in our organization. At our best, we transcend it; at our worst, we uncouciously replicate it. Can we please name it?)

Data shows that African American women are dramatically the most disadvantaged in our US culture and at Habitat. What is Habitat doing to address the barriers African American women face?

Inability to pay bonds results in higher rates of conviction, longer sentences, loss of housing and jobs, separation of families and lost custody of children - as a housing organization, this is a way to contribute to the communities we claim to serve.(In addition to advocacy and using its voice, does Habitat intend to take any action items, such as donating to community bond funds for people charged with crimes/who are impacted by structural violence in Atlanta? Atlanta, where HFHI is headquartered, is hurting right now. )

Even when we can build again, how can we "Build together" and insure that we are avoiding paternalism and "building for" instead of "building with?" How many African-Americans have been mistaken for homeowners on a build site, even our own leadership?

Can we PLEASE stop saying "integrate" or "embed" when it comes to race? Our founders didn't.....

Maaaan, I don’t want to let leadership totally off the hook (cause we can all do better) but this conversation, the ERGs, and our mission are all examples of how Habitat is working to be more inclusive, which makes the world and the organization better. This is not the time to pat ourselves on the back, but we shouldn’t let the justified frustration and hurt take away from some of the progress made (noting again we all, especially those in power, can do more).

So the stats are worse 50 years after the fair lendin act was passed. and we've been building for most of those 50 years. if we do not change our approach to focus more on the foundation of systemic historical racism and injustice, our impact will continue to be too marginal to actually help push change. we will keep building houses for some people in a system that racist at its core

what is the goal of ppl of color as far as percentage in hfhi. the us demographic is 12.6%, and we are 29% i think you said. is it 30% 50% or have we exceeded the goal?

Are there any measures in place to ensure that people of color are actually hired? I understand that having a more diverse applicant pool can help, but studies have shown that between white and black applicants of similar standing, white applicants are more likely to be hired under the guise that the white applicant is more qualified

One way to put your "money where your mouth is," to be proactive in healing the wounds of discrimination in housing would be to specifically choose to build, repair and removate in African American neighborhoods by partnering with local African American organizations through every affiliate or in every state.. It's important that the work be done and without a "savior" mentality, so the partnerships are key.

This defensiveness again is disappointing. It's not about numbers, it's about how PoC feel within the workspace. So again, to say, we see you and we feel you. And as leadership continues to make changes - what truly matters is how staff feel those. And if they don't, that should tell leadership something. But they can't say "we are doing work" becuase intent and impact are so different.
 
Last edited:
**** going to die in the senate. Need a new system for sure.



Abolish the senate for starters. Rules are dumb.

What does them kneeling in West African garments have to do w/ Black Americans?
tenor (12).gif
 
I think it is fair for people to criticize the Democratic Party. I just think that many of the criticisms ignore other forces at play, so they are not very good criticisms.

And yeah, folk need to break out of this constant "both sides" framing.

I do not feel that Dems are above criticism. Like you mentioned folks continually want to frame both parties as identical, you and I both know this is so far from the truth.
 
What does them kneeling in West African garments have to do w/ Black Americans?
tenor (12).gif

The congressional black caucus gave it to them.These kente scarves are common with black Americans at graduations, ceremonies etc.

It’s a tone death, corny look. But what’s in that bill...if it were ever to pass the senate would def be good for black Americans.
 
Earlier, I posted about my company having an all employee townhall meeting. Alot of these questions weren't read. WOW

They sent us the questions/comments that were made in the meetings:

I am incredibly frustrated by the tone, content, responses, and structure of this call.

To white people - going to every black person you know to apologize is not enough... honestly we may not really care too much for your white tears - use your privielge to speak to your family, freinds, partners - post on social media, start dialogue with the white people you know, create conversations with them. What are you doing on a personal level when people of color, black people are not around or present.

Habitat needs to be courageous and take a stand. This harkens back to our roots. Saying Black Lives Matter is not enough. We need to say more, do more.

How is Habitat planning to publicly lift up and center black voices at this time? What actions will Habitat commit to long-term to address the ways we (consciously and unconsciously) perpetuate systemic racial injustice and white supremacy?

Does Habitat plan to provide additional time off for staff who want to participate in peaceful protests AND/OR who simply need emotional rest?

I am pleased to hear that Habitat is working on diversity and inclusion plans. I have sat on teams where person after person hired has been white, and I have been the only person of color on my team. I would also recommend that there is more transparency in salary ranges to ensure that salaries are based on the duties associated with the position and are equitable across race and gender. It has appeared in the past that some people who are newly hired and with less experience have been paid more than those of color in similar positions. Once we are in a more secure situation, are their plans in place to evaluate salaries to make sure they are fair and are their plans to make general salary ranges available for position families?

Much like how we believe housing is foundational for forging a path out of poverty, violence toward African Americans who represent a significant portion of the people we serve in the US undermines the value of the work we do. What good is housing if this violence and deep seeded racial inequality continues? We are accountable to the people we serve and to operate with integrity and courage to make a stand with them. Habitat was birthed out of racial equality, we stood for that then and we stand for it now. We must continue to adapt this same voice to a changing environment. How does HFHI expect to do that?

I would like Habitat to acknowled the ways we fall short in empowering and uplifting its black staff. And once acknowledged, how can we do this better?

Dr. Martin Luther King said "We must recognize that we can't solve our problem now until there is a radical redistribution of economic and political power." In Memphis, just before he was killed, he said "the whole structure of American life must be changed." In this short time, we have seen the whole structure of American life change. The pandemic has shined a glaring spotlight on the problem. How can we be an active, forceful part of the solution, bringing people together to bring HOPE? Can we be louder on the need for equity?

Comment: I think we also need to acknowledge that as upsetting, sad, outraging, infurtating as all this is, our brothers and sisters who are people of color have been dealing with all these emotions (and more) for +400 years. I can't even imagine their emotional burden. Let's make this 100% about people of color by not dominating the conversation with what white people are feeling right now. It's also important but white people ought to be leveraging priviledge to amplify voices of POC by not talking about ourselves.

I live in Houston, TX. My heart hurts anytime a person of color is senselessly killed, but this hits home. I have personally rubbed shoulders with George Floyd at various social outings. I am not OKAY and I cannot fake a smile anywhere, let alone at work. How is Habitat, as an organization, supporting employees who are simply traumarized and emotionally tired.

Does Habitat plan to specifically denounce police brutality?

Comment: Participating in Black Out Tuesday is not meaningful action. While these posts may be well-intended, several activists and influencers have pointed out that posting a blank black image with a bunch of tags clogs up critical channels of information and updates. It comes across as an empty gesture

this is a comment - please understand and take accountablity for the fact that the answer "We don't know...it will take some time to figure out" is the same excuse that has been used for the past 3 years in regards to the diversity & inclusion agenda at Habitat. ERG's are not enough, as person of color I'm tired of talking - we can figure out a strategic plans in a month, we can create a new job position within a few weeks with no funding - but in regards to race we still don't really know? We can't believe what you say and we dont see what you do.

Mental health is a valid reason to use sick leave

Managers need to be held accountable to their black staff. Regularly checking in to see if they have a need that hasn't been met and not just when we have a George Floyd incident, but regularly doing this to ensure DEI is being accomplished.

There is a history of silence in Habitat when crisis or flashpoint related to race happen in US. Some of your colleagues have directly experienced a death similar to George Floyd and those national headline incidents were not acknowledged by Habitat.

Time and time again, we ask people to share their stories and open up wounds for the sake of teaching others in the organization. To what end? What is the plan? Where are the organization's actionable items?

How do we balance the need to leverage this horrific tragedy for the social changes we all know need to occur in this country (and world) while ensuring additional innocent lives are not lost by the collateral damage of our collective outrage and despair? What responsibility do we accept as a ministry to drive critical social changes while not inadvertently stoking the fires that still burn in cities across the country?

Is there any plan to make our leadership team more diverse ? I konw we have done some work, but the reality is Habitat does not look like the families we serve. For instance, what about hiring someone to focus on Diversity and Inclusion? Adrienne shouldnl't be the only senior leader who can speak from a black perspective.

What's the "real" reason why we aren't more bold with our external messaging and leveraging our brand to ignite more conversations in our sector? We've have fallen short yet again...

With response saying "housing for' everyone'" feels dilluted and a bit detracting around what we know about housing and race and opportunity - like 'all lives matter' vs 'black lives matter'. and individual introspection is important - but how are our leaders and network willing to call our impact on POC? how can we say our approach and model is meant to redress redlining? how can we say our policy and adv work is meant to dismantle racist systems? that cant be done individually. that requires naming it and giving stronger direction and prioritization from Habitat's leaders

In my role, I visit a lot of different Habitat builds and meet with a lot of volunteers and affilaite staff. More than a handful of times, I have heard volunteers and sometimes affiliate staff say things that they clearly don't realize are offensive and stem from racism. For example, referring to a Black homeowner or staff person as "so articulate." While I feel personally okay speaking up, I do not know how I should do this while also representing HFHI. I'd love more official guidance on how to deal with these situations.

I have heard many comments regarding leaders being uncomfortable to speak about racial issues. Our work uses images of black and brown people freely and is responsible for addressing these issues and not cherry picking

Apart from building communities and bringing races together through the work that we do for the world to see, how is Habitat planning to shift the paradigm internally and ensure that race is not used to perpretuate stereotypes, for example, how often we showcase black donors instead of just showcasing black homeowners in our social media, the way we present our work, perpetuates the racial divide if we don't change our culture internally and seek activelly to identify our own biases.

What are the accountability measures to affiliates if its found they are practicing bias/racist practices? What pathway do the black employees/homewoners have to voice their concerns. If the leadership is more than 90% white how do we acount for those power dynamics? We heard an example from black employees t an affiliate who weren't egtting better fixtures, even though they were in the budget becaue as the affiliate leader said "they are getting a house anyway". How is that person still an affiliate leader? What weight do we give the ability to bring in donors over bad behavior.

Very disappointing so far..

When we talk about external consultants and vendors, I think an action step we could take is to invest in vendors who also support diversity and equity in their staffing. I recently went through a training and when I checked out the company's website, it was all white faces. Something is wrong that in 2020, this vendor did not appear to have any Black or brown leaders. Let's stop spending our money with these vendors.

This is a lot of talk and numbers without having clearly defined the problem explicitly within HFHI.(As a DE&I instructor and long-time Habitat employee, I'm personally frustrated that we (HFHI) haven't adequately named the white privelege problem that exists in our organization. At our best, we transcend it; at our worst, we uncouciously replicate it. Can we please name it?)

Data shows that African American women are dramatically the most disadvantaged in our US culture and at Habitat. What is Habitat doing to address the barriers African American women face?

Inability to pay bonds results in higher rates of conviction, longer sentences, loss of housing and jobs, separation of families and lost custody of children - as a housing organization, this is a way to contribute to the communities we claim to serve.(In addition to advocacy and using its voice, does Habitat intend to take any action items, such as donating to community bond funds for people charged with crimes/who are impacted by structural violence in Atlanta? Atlanta, where HFHI is headquartered, is hurting right now. )

Even when we can build again, how can we "Build together" and insure that we are avoiding paternalism and "building for" instead of "building with?" How many African-Americans have been mistaken for homeowners on a build site, even our own leadership?

Can we PLEASE stop saying "integrate" or "embed" when it comes to race? Our founders didn't.....

Maaaan, I don’t want to let leadership totally off the hook (cause we can all do better) but this conversation, the ERGs, and our mission are all examples of how Habitat is working to be more inclusive, which makes the world and the organization better. This is not the time to pat ourselves on the back, but we shouldn’t let the justified frustration and hurt take away from some of the progress made (noting again we all, especially those in power, can do more).

So the stats are worse 50 years after the fair lendin act was passed. and we've been building for most of those 50 years. if we do not change our approach to focus more on the foundation of systemic historical racism and injustice, our impact will continue to be too marginal to actually help push change. we will keep building houses for some people in a system that racist at its core

what is the goal of ppl of color as far as percentage in hfhi. the us demographic is 12.6%, and we are 29% i think you said. is it 30% 50% or have we exceeded the goal?

Are there any measures in place to ensure that people of color are actually hired? I understand that having a more diverse applicant pool can help, but studies have shown that between white and black applicants of similar standing, white applicants are more likely to be hired under the guise that the white applicant is more qualified

One way to put your "money where your mouth is," to be proactive in healing the wounds of discrimination in housing would be to specifically choose to build, repair and removate in African American neighborhoods by partnering with local African American organizations through every affiliate or in every state.. It's important that the work be done and without a "savior" mentality, so the partnerships are key.

This defensiveness again is disappointing. It's not about numbers, it's about how PoC feel within the workspace. So again, to say, we see you and we feel you. And as leadership continues to make changes - what truly matters is how staff feel those. And if they don't, that should tell leadership something. But they can't say "we are doing work" becuase intent and impact are so different.

we bout to have a call in 30 minutes. We just typed up some demands and **** too. I got some notes ova here. Bout to go off in a lil bit :lol
 
The congressional black caucus gave it to them.These kente scarves are common with black Americans at graduations, ceremonies etc.

It’s a tone death, corny look. But what’s in that bill...if it were ever to pass the senate would def be good for black Americans.
:lol: I just knew it was a black person's idea.
 
The GOP is actively attempting to destroy my life as well as the lives of my children and millions of other black lives in this country. I have no desire to spoon feed a functioning adult information that is easier than ever to access. Miss me with this.
I wasn't asking about the GOP. I'm asking what has the Democratic party accomplished, not just proposed, to make you think so highly of them? It was said that even when they held both houses they still didn't get enough done. And I assume whatever they did get done has been overturned by now with this administration so what's really the difference. Good cop/bad cop routine. The good cop acts like he's looking out for you and even seems sincere. But he just doesn't quite do enough. That damn bad cop is always ruining any progress. They're both cops. They go pick up their check at the same place. They work for the same person.

It's the system itself that has allowed the GOP to achieve their muscle. The Democrats are in the fabric of that very system. You telling me you can replace all of them with a gang of black Panthers and the outcome would be the same? Huey Newton finna hold a press conference talking bout yea we tried but you know they was gerrymandering and **** so we just gotta deal with it. Until I see any progress in reality I'm not buying the dream. I see them kneeling but what do they actually stand for? What have they ever done that hasn't been undone?
 



hmm DEFINITELY just saw a car roll up and pop a guy in Seattle then slip away into the crowd.

worth noting that he escaped in the direction of cops and was not neutralized after the suspected shooting.


Yoooo that dude is a barber off Roosevelt! Knew him since high school. We are hoping this is a mid understanding! Holy ****
 
I wasn't asking about the GOP. I'm asking what has the Democratic party accomplished, not just proposed, to make you think so highly of them? It was said that even when they held both houses they still didn't get enough done. And I assume whatever they did get done has been overturned by now with this administration so what's really the difference. Good cop/bad cop routine. The good cop acts like he's looking out for you and even seems sincere. But he just doesn't quite do enough. That damn bad cop is always ruining any progress. They're both cops. They go pick up their check at the same place. They work for the same person.

It's the system itself that has allowed the GOP to achieve their muscle. The Democrats are in the fabric of that very system. You telling me you can replace all of them with a gang of black Panthers and the outcome would be the same? Huey Newton finna hold a press conference talking bout yea we tried but you know they was gerrymandering and **** so we just gotta deal with it. Until I see any progress in reality I'm not buying the dream. I see them kneeling but what do they actually stand for? What have they ever done that hasn't been undone?

Aren’t you the dude that believes in lizard people? Sorry fam but I didn’t read any of this based on that.
 
Can you detail this for me?

I'll give you some that stuck out to me that have come under democratic led congress but I'm sure you can research further.

Also important to note that in most of our parents lifetimes the Dems have had a supermajority where basically they can pass legislation with virtually no opposition (Republican president or not enough senate seats to override filibuster) only 3 times (1965, 1977, 2007). Not coincidentally that's when some of the most impacful legislation was passed.

88th Congress (1963-1965)

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964) is a landmark civil rights and labor law in the United States that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.[4] It prohibits unequal application of voter registration requirements, and racial segregation in schools, employment, and public accommodations.

89th Congress (1965-1967) supermajority

Designed to enforce the voting rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, the Act secured the right to vote for racial minorities throughout the country, especially in the South. The Act's "general provisions" provide nationwide protections for voting rights. Section 2 is a general provision that prohibits every state and local government from imposing any voting law that results in discrimination against racial or language minorities. Other general provisions specifically outlaw literacy tests and similar devices that were historically used to disenfranchise racial minorities.

The 1968 act expanded on previous acts and prohibited discrimination concerning the sale, rental, and financing of housing based on race, religion, national origin. The act also made it a federal crime to "by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone... by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin, handicap or familial status.

95th congress (1977-1979)

The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA, P.L. 95-128, 91 Stat. 1147, title VIII of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1977, 12 U.S.C. § 2901 et seq.) is a United States federal law designed to encourage commercial banks and savings associations to help meet the needs of borrowers in all segments of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.[1][2][3] Congress passed the Act in 1977 to reduce discriminatory credit practices against low-income neighborhoods, a practice known as redlining.

102nd Congress (1991-1993)
It provided the right to trial by jury on discrimination claims and introduced the possibility of emotional distress damages and limited the amount that a jury could award.

111th congress (2007-2009) supermajority
Together with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 amendment, it represents the U.S. healthcare system's most significant regulatory overhaul and expansion of coverage since the passage of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965.

The Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (Pub.L. 111–220) was an Act of Congress that was signed into federal law by United States President Barack Obama on August 3, 2010 that reduces the disparity between the amount of crack cocaine and powder cocaine needed to trigger certain federal criminal penalties from a 100:1 weight ratio to an 18:1 weight ratio and eliminated the five-year mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession of crack cocaine, among other provisions. Further controversy surrounding the 100:1 ratio was a result of its description by some as being racially biased and contributing to a disproportionate number of African Americans being sentenced for crack cocaine offenses.

There are other acts that are comprehensive but those are the ones that specifically to me have a clear distinction between what the 2 parties fundamentally try to do. In voting practices, fair housing and treatment of employees, healthcare and education there's clear lines drawn. Yes the Democrats will always have the crime bill of 1994 on their hands and its wide sweeping devastation that's still being felt too this day, but they are the only party that's going to make active strides to try and remedy it. You have a clear choice, Republicans are trying to ACTIVELY move things towards a pre Civil rights movement era. That's where the apathy can't be allowed.
 
The congressional black caucus gave it to them.These kente scarves are common with black Americans at graduations, ceremonies etc.

It’s a tone death, corny look. But what’s in that bill...if it were ever to pass the senate would def be good for black Americans.
•Create a nat'l registry to track officer misconduct:
-This is already in place. Hasn't kept cops from getting fired n stuff.

•Make it easier to sue officers who unjustly injure people:
-Sounds good, but how if the law (courts) back the law? The courts are historically bias. Dred Scott should be an afterthought, but nah.

•Limit military gear sent to police:
What does this even mean? No more tanks? What?

•1. Ban chokeholds & 2. no-knock arrest warrants in drug cases:
1. Unless of camera is involved how is that to be assured? I'm supposed to pay for lip blame
2. Search warrants have been getting violated for years.

Can u point me to an article if you've read ones that goes into depth b/c all this just sounds like "ima do better" w/ no depth.
 
I'll give you some that stuck out to me that have come under democratic led congress but I'm sure you can research further.

Also important to note that in most of our parents lifetimes the Dems have had a supermajority where basically they can pass legislation with virtually no opposition (Republican president or not enough senate seats to override filibuster) only 3 times (1965, 1995, 2007). Not coincidentally that's when some of the most impacful legislation was passed.

88th Congress (1963-1965)

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964) is a landmark civil rights and labor law in the United States that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.[4] It prohibits unequal application of voter registration requirements, and racial segregation in schools, employment, and public accommodations.

89th Congress (1965-1967) supermajority

Designed to enforce the voting rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, the Act secured the right to vote for racial minorities throughout the country, especially in the South. The Act's "general provisions" provide nationwide protections for voting rights. Section 2 is a general provision that prohibits every state and local government from imposing any voting law that results in discrimination against racial or language minorities. Other general provisions specifically outlaw literacy tests and similar devices that were historically used to disenfranchise racial minorities.

The 1968 act expanded on previous acts and prohibited discrimination concerning the sale, rental, and financing of housing based on race, religion, national origin. The act also made it a federal crime to "by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere with anyone... by reason of their race, color, religion, or national origin, handicap or familial status.

95th congress (1977-1979)

The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA, P.L. 95-128, 91 Stat. 1147, title VIII of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1977, 12 U.S.C. § 2901 et seq.) is a United States federal law designed to encourage commercial banks and savings associations to help meet the needs of borrowers in all segments of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.[1][2][3] Congress passed the Act in 1977 to reduce discriminatory credit practices against low-income neighborhoods, a practice known as redlining.

102nd Congress (1991-1993)
It provided the right to trial by jury on discrimination claims and introduced the possibility of emotional distress damages and limited the amount that a jury could award.

111th congress (2007-2009) supermajority
Together with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 amendment, it represents the U.S. healthcare system's most significant regulatory overhaul and expansion of coverage since the passage of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965.

The Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (Pub.L. 111–220) was an Act of Congress that was signed into federal law by United States President Barack Obama on August 3, 2010 that reduces the disparity between the amount of crack cocaine and powder cocaine needed to trigger certain federal criminal penalties from a 100:1 weight ratio to an 18:1 weight ratio and eliminated the five-year mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession of crack cocaine, among other provisions. Further controversy surrounding the 100:1 ratio was a result of its description by some as being racially biased and contributing to a disproportionate number of African Americans being sentenced for crack cocaine offenses.

There are other acts that are comprehensive but those are the ones that specifically to me have a clear distinction between what the 2 parties fundamentally try to do. In voting practices, fair housing and treatment of employees, healthcare and education there's clear lines drawn. Yes the Democrats will always have the crime bill of 1994 on their hands and its wide sweeping devastation that's still being felt too this day, but they are the only party that's going to make active strides to try and remedy it. You have a clear choice, Republicans are trying to ACTIVELY move things towards a pre Civil rights movement era. That's where the apathy can't be allowed.

What are your thoughts on the First Step Act and Fair Chance Act passed under this administration?
 
"Attempted malicious wounding" :lol:

Does Virginia not have an attempted murder statute? Because I'm pretty sure running your car into people should fall under that. Especially when it's a BLM gathering and the perp is an admitted KKK member.
America seems to find it difficult to admit that the Klan exists, so him being a KKK member won't mean much in court. Especially in Virginia.
 
•Create a nat'l registry to track officer misconduct:
-This is already in place. Hasn't kept cops from getting fired n stuff.

•Make it easier to sue officers who unjustly injure people:
-Sounds good, but how if the law (courts) back the law? The courts are historically bias. Dred Scott should be an afterthought, but nah.

•Limit military gear sent to police:
What does this even mean? No more tanks? What?

•1. Ban chokeholds & 2. no-knock arrest warrants in drug cases:
1. Unless of camera is involved how is that to be assured? I'm supposed to pay for lip blame
2. Search warrants have been getting violated for years.

Can u point me to an article if you've read ones that goes into depth b/c all this just sounds like "ima do better" w/ no depth.

Here’s an article that goes in depth. Hope you read it.

 
How did you feel when you heard that? You spoke up?
Yeah this convo was thru text, but he made some other comments as well about how white people run everything and that if they wanted they could fire us and that he doesn't want any problems..I told him pretty much he sounds dumb as ****, Im disappointed in him and that I hope he doesn't tell his daughter this type of stuff
 
Back
Top Bottom