- 9,105
- 95
I believe the Lakers are at 76 mil, and the threshold is 80ish. so the Lakers would have to pay ~4 mil extra at the moment, with Sasha. just something I readon another board, so I'm not 100% sure
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by knightngale
dont compare sasha's contract to walton's
walton STILL has 5 years left (total of 6)
vujacic can be traded for a second round pick or something if he sucks next year
walton is untradeable
Originally Posted by PharelFor3
damn for that price, the Lakers should have thrown that type of money at J.R. Smith.....
ON THE VERGE: There hasn't been a whole lot of chatter about Randolph Morris since he made an appearance at the Hawks' mini-camp at Philips Arena.
But several of my spies contend that he's set to join the Hawks' roster for this upcoming season (on a two-year, minimum deal that would allow the Hawks to bolster their frontcourt rotation significantly).
ATTN: Josh Smith.
If we sign your buddy, the one you once called "the next Tim Duncan", will you re-sign, please?
There are at least two, blockbuster sign-and-trade proposals the Hawks are chewing on regarding Smith (one from a Western Conference power and the other from an Eastern Conference big dog) that could dramatically change the landscape in Hawksville.
The "proverbial" ball appears to be clearly in the Hawks' court regarding both opportunities, and we should presume many more. Because if they are resigned to the fact that they don't intend to pay Smith a salary commensurate with what he feels he's worth, then there only recourse is to sign-and-trade him.
The leverage we all assumed the Hawks had with their own restricted free agents went up in smoke last week when Childress bounced.
http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/ajc/hawks/entries/2008/07/26/switching_lanes.html
*Sigh* WHY can't the Grizzlies just go ahead and get this guy with the money they have? I guess Josh Smith isn't in our "3-year plan" tobecoming contenders. The only Western Conference powerhouse teams I could think of that may want him would be the Lakers (Odom) and Mavs (Howard). Maybe thePistons are trying to acquire him from the East in some deal.
http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/ajc/hawks/entries/2008/07/26/switching_lanes.htmlOriginally Posted by bhzmafia14
There are at least two, blockbuster sign-and-trade proposals the Hawks are chewing on regarding Smith (one from a Western Conference power and the other from an Eastern Conference big dog) that could dramatically change the landscape in Hawksville.
The "proverbial" ball appears to be clearly in the Hawks' court regarding both opportunities, and we should presume many more. Because if they are resigned to the fact that they don't intend to pay Smith a salary commensurate with what he feels he's worth, then there only recourse is to sign-and-trade him.
The leverage we all assumed the Hawks had with their own restricted free agents went up in smoke last week when Childress bounced.
*Sigh* WHY can't the Grizzlies just go ahead and get this guy with the money they have? I guess Josh Smith isn't in our "3-year plan" to becoming contenders.
They aren't trading him in a salary dump, so unless Memphis is willing to trade OJ or Rudy it's not happening whether they want it to ornot...
They aren't trading him in a salary dump, so unless Memphis is willing to trade OJ or Rudy it's not happening whether they want it to or not...Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
*Sigh* WHY can't the Grizzlies just go ahead and get this guy with the money they have? I guess Josh Smith isn't in our "3-year plan" to becoming contenders.
I meant we could've at least gave him an offer sheet and force ATL to either overpay for him or let us get him.
Good call... Went brain dead and didn't even think about that.My bad.
This can't help but make one wonder who exactly the teams are that Sekou Smith was referring to. Could the LA Lakers be the "Western Conference powerhouse" poised to make a play for Smith?
Well, the Lakers could offer Lamar Odom to the Hawks and take back Smith and point guard Speedy Claxton, provided the deal Smith signs with Atlanta before being traded is enough to match salaries given his BYC status. The move would give the Lakers the defensive presence it lacked in the Finals against the Boston Celtics, and it would also provide the Hawks with a good player and an expiring contract in Odom valued at over $14 million.
http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=9603
Originally Posted by LamarOwnsem
Smith is not an upgrade over Odom. Smith has one of the poorest shot selections and he wouldn't help chemistry.
The Denver Nuggets could be a suitor, too, as a result of the $10 million trade exception the team received in the Marcus Camby deal according to league sources. In addition to the trade exception, the Nuggets have some future first round picks to play with as well as young talent like J.R. Smith and Linas Kleiza. The Nuggets are the only team that can offer the Hawks straight cap relief. The question is whether or not the Nuggets would be willing to shell out somewhere in the neighborhood of $10-12 million for Smith, which would once again put the Nuggets deep into luxury tax territory.
I say they do it. They were in the luxury tax territory, and Camby is turning 35. Getting rid of him and replacing him withJosh Smith would be an excellent move.
I say they do it. They were in the luxury tax territory, and Camby is turning 35. Getting rid of him and replacing him with Josh Smith would be an excellent move.Originally Posted by DMV is RNB
The Denver Nuggets could be a suitor, too, as a result of the $10 million trade exception the team received in the Marcus Camby deal according to league sources. In addition to the trade exception, the Nuggets have some future first round picks to play with as well as young talent like J.R. Smith and Linas Kleiza. The Nuggets are the only team that can offer the Hawks straight cap relief. The question is whether or not the Nuggets would be willing to shell out somewhere in the neighborhood of $10-12 million for Smith, which would once again put the Nuggets deep into luxury tax territory.
Originally Posted by LamarOwnsem
Smith is not an upgrade over Odom. Smith has one of the poorest shot selections and he wouldn't help chemistry.
AYOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOriginally Posted by JapanAir21
Originally Posted by LamarOwnsem
Smith is not an upgrade over Odom. Smith has one of the poorest shot selections and he wouldn't help chemistry.
I feel you. I'd rather keep Odom. Yeah, Smith is sexplosive, he's great on defense, but I think they're good as they are on Defense.