- 5,315
- 1,974
Read case studies? Someone's opinion on here basically is a case study.
This is why bro science gets spread like wild-fire.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Read case studies? Someone's opinion on here basically is a case study.
What were you eating? Candy, cakes? Etc. What was your problem child?I tell folks all the time, drop sugar out of your diet and watch how lean you get. It took me the longest (I think it was Durden when we went back and forth on the carbs thing) to finally realize carbs wasn't the issue, it was the fact I was eating just way to much sugar, which I contributed it to be simply eating to much carbs.
yea I agree DC..explain more rook
You really had to call me a child though over what I posted? Dog, grow up.
Have you tried cycling it?Took my usual 2 scoops of C4 today and I didn't feel anything at all. It was working alright until today. Smh.
LMAO. I took it as what was your weakness, what was your main problem food.You really had to call me a child though over what I posted? Dog, grow up.
Actually, I think you're the only one saying loading is pointless.
lol the entire bb.com forum says it, and many articles state it too. But its his money he can load if he wants.
Money has nothing to do with loading or not loading. If you or anyone else thinks loading is a scheme to buy more then you have absolutely no clue on how to take creatine.
Is loading necessary? No
Does it work? Yes
Is it a money making conspiracy? Hell no.
Still on my 1st month with it.Have you tried cycling it?
The only difference is that one is in an academic journal, and one is on Niketalk. They are both retrospective, mostly concerning one case. Case studies carry practically zero weight in academic circles, although they can be starting points for changes in treatment regimens, characterization of new illness, etc.Case studies are done scientifically. Some dude on here is way less credible than a case study for a variety of reasons.
No, I was asking what was your problem child. I wasn't saying, what was your problem, CHILD.You really had to call me a child though over what I posted? Dog, grow up.
Hit 175 on the bench today to the JT album
Benching 20 lbs over my own weight. Feels good
And I can still barely do 1 pullup
Props man i like reading stuff like this I hit 185 bench for the first time. I weigh about 180 now. I was kinda proud even though everyone around me was warming up with the same amount
My dad always told me it doesn't matter how much weight you put up, its a science. Work = Force x displacement (distance really). And Force = Mass x Acceleration. So basically work is a product of your mass to some degree. So when you see that dude who is 300lbs putting up 275lbs just realize...you are doing more work then he is. When you see dudes who are 5 foot 5 200lbs doing those half squats with 315 like they are a boss and you get 315lb ATG....you are doing more work.
Actually, I think you're the only one saying loading is pointless.
lol the entire bb.com forum says it, and many articles state it too. But its his money he can load if he wants.
Money has nothing to do with loading or not loading. If you or anyone else thinks loading is a scheme to buy more then you have absolutely no clue on how to take creatine.
Is loading necessary? No
Does it work? Yes
Is it a money making conspiracy? Hell no.
So.. is every three hours sufficient time between dosages or do I need to wait longer?
Props man i like reading stuff like this I hit 185 bench for the first time. I weigh about 180 now. I was kinda proud even though everyone around me was warming up with the same amount
My dad always told me it doesn't matter how much weight you put up, its a science. Work = Force x displacement (distance really). And Force = Mass x Acceleration. So basically work is a product of your mass to some degree. So when you see that dude who is 300lbs putting up 275lbs just realize...you are doing more work then he is. When you see dudes who are 5 foot 5 200lbs doing those half squats with 315 like they are a boss and you get 315lb ATG....you are doing more work.
That's actually the wrong interpretation of Mass in those formulas. The mass taken into account is that of the object being moved (and having work done on it), and can include portions of bodyweight depending on the movement. A guy moving 175 lbs is doing less work than a guy moving 275 lbs, according to the standard physics definition. If the force(weight) is high enough, you can compensate for less distance to do the same work. That speaks nothing about the usefulness of those movements though. What you are talking about is quality of movement and relative strength (strength to bodyweight ratio).
Read case studies? Someone's opinion on here basically is a case study.
Let's get this thread back on track...
with a wimmenz fail