You said he wasn't elite though.
KD last year, LeBron the years before...extraordinary.Over the past 2 months he's put up a 64.7 TS% with a usage rate of almost 30%. That's not normal.
"A good season but nothing extraordinary."
He's leading the league in RPM, 3rd in PER, he's the best shooter in the league, he's 6th in assist rate, his defense is much improved, and the Warriors are 17.5 points better with him on the floor than the bench.
Only an idiot would put the words "Curry" and "meh" in the same sentence.
I said it was a good season, nothing extraordinary. Like Nash had and Rose had. Is that a crime. I'm not admitting **** besides I was wrong about GSW not making the playoffs, everything else is in play. It's an opinion: compared to what the other candidates were doing and had to endure, and the raw numbers saying his season was very similar, he's improved, but the so have the pieces around him.So you bring up the past 2 seasons by LeBron and Durant which just happen to be two of the most efficient high-volume scoring seasons IN THE HISTORY OF BASKETBALL in a weak attempt to discredit Curry's season?
Look, everyone is wrong at some point or another, you can just admit you're being ridiculous right now.
I get the points you are making and I agree for the most point but I don't think the media will see or vote the same way. Like I said its hard to give the mvp on subjective things like winning more games than expected with less talented teammates. I think in the end they will look at the team records, see that they have comparable stats and then give the mvp to chef curry.
That a boy AR let em know
Then GSW went on a run and took the lead.
