- 74,834
- 24,224
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2008
I should be living in Cali by then
***The Official Legalization of Cannabis Thread***
Truth
formerly dtruth07
- 3,711
- 633
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2005
drug dealers rejoice ! we still in business !
Truth
formerly dtruth07
- 3,711
- 633
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2005
drug dealers rejoice ! we still in business !
- 21,365
- 812
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
- 21,365
- 812
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
- 19,391
- 899
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
Originally Posted by DTruth07
drug dealers rejoice ! we still in business !
But I'm not tripping I knew it wouldn't passed. I'm more ashamed at my fellow smokers and their silly paranoid reasons for voting no further perpetuating the stereotype of "stoners"
- 19,391
- 899
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
Originally Posted by DTruth07
drug dealers rejoice ! we still in business !
But I'm not tripping I knew it wouldn't passed. I'm more ashamed at my fellow smokers and their silly paranoid reasons for voting no further perpetuating the stereotype of "stoners"
- 756
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
I'm glad it did'nt pass.
- 756
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
I'm glad it did'nt pass.
- 2,503
- 12
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2007
shoutout to the lazy stoners who didn't vote yet are mad as $$@% it didn't pass... smh
- 2,503
- 12
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2007
shoutout to the lazy stoners who didn't vote yet are mad as $$@% it didn't pass... smh
- 2,506
- 109
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2005
Californians really blew it.
Yeah, so it's still decriminalized there. What about the entire world of cannabis users who were hoping this would jump start the change we needed in this country? I mean, we got the scientific evidence. We got enough people and officials backing the movement. All we needed was people to come out and vote.
California would have been the perfect case study. Think, obviously after legalization there would be questions and speed bumps, but things would iron out. The obvious pros and legalization would become apparent and obvious to neighboring states, and legalization would hopefully move all the way East.
Opposition listened without realizing that the one of the biggest reasons the opposition has to vote against this is that the law has some vague wording at times? BIG DEAL read any legislation and tell me you won't find some areas open to interpretation. It's up to the judicial branch to interpret any law independently. They aren't stupid and would obviously see what the point of the bill is, and what a logical and understandable "distance" would be.
No legislation is perfect. But the justification for Stop19 at #2 is "Prop 19 creates several new cannabis related crimes with extremely severe penalties. Don’t pass a joint to a 17 year old, you will be looking at a max of 7 years in state prison, seriously. " SERIOUSLY?!
With these kind of arguments winning over people against a historic legislation, I don't think it'll ever pass.
"Oh well I still have my card derp derp." Fools.
Yeah, so it's still decriminalized there. What about the entire world of cannabis users who were hoping this would jump start the change we needed in this country? I mean, we got the scientific evidence. We got enough people and officials backing the movement. All we needed was people to come out and vote.
California would have been the perfect case study. Think, obviously after legalization there would be questions and speed bumps, but things would iron out. The obvious pros and legalization would become apparent and obvious to neighboring states, and legalization would hopefully move all the way East.
Opposition listened without realizing that the one of the biggest reasons the opposition has to vote against this is that the law has some vague wording at times? BIG DEAL read any legislation and tell me you won't find some areas open to interpretation. It's up to the judicial branch to interpret any law independently. They aren't stupid and would obviously see what the point of the bill is, and what a logical and understandable "distance" would be.
No legislation is perfect. But the justification for Stop19 at #2 is "Prop 19 creates several new cannabis related crimes with extremely severe penalties. Don’t pass a joint to a 17 year old, you will be looking at a max of 7 years in state prison, seriously. " SERIOUSLY?!
With these kind of arguments winning over people against a historic legislation, I don't think it'll ever pass.
"Oh well I still have my card derp derp." Fools.
- 2,506
- 109
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2005
Californians really blew it.
Yeah, so it's still decriminalized there. What about the entire world of cannabis users who were hoping this would jump start the change we needed in this country? I mean, we got the scientific evidence. We got enough people and officials backing the movement. All we needed was people to come out and vote.
California would have been the perfect case study. Think, obviously after legalization there would be questions and speed bumps, but things would iron out. The obvious pros and legalization would become apparent and obvious to neighboring states, and legalization would hopefully move all the way East.
Opposition listened without realizing that the one of the biggest reasons the opposition has to vote against this is that the law has some vague wording at times? BIG DEAL read any legislation and tell me you won't find some areas open to interpretation. It's up to the judicial branch to interpret any law independently. They aren't stupid and would obviously see what the point of the bill is, and what a logical and understandable "distance" would be.
No legislation is perfect. But the justification for Stop19 at #2 is "Prop 19 creates several new cannabis related crimes with extremely severe penalties. Don’t pass a joint to a 17 year old, you will be looking at a max of 7 years in state prison, seriously. " SERIOUSLY?!
With these kind of arguments winning over people against a historic legislation, I don't think it'll ever pass.
"Oh well I still have my card derp derp." Fools.
Yeah, so it's still decriminalized there. What about the entire world of cannabis users who were hoping this would jump start the change we needed in this country? I mean, we got the scientific evidence. We got enough people and officials backing the movement. All we needed was people to come out and vote.
California would have been the perfect case study. Think, obviously after legalization there would be questions and speed bumps, but things would iron out. The obvious pros and legalization would become apparent and obvious to neighboring states, and legalization would hopefully move all the way East.
Opposition listened without realizing that the one of the biggest reasons the opposition has to vote against this is that the law has some vague wording at times? BIG DEAL read any legislation and tell me you won't find some areas open to interpretation. It's up to the judicial branch to interpret any law independently. They aren't stupid and would obviously see what the point of the bill is, and what a logical and understandable "distance" would be.
No legislation is perfect. But the justification for Stop19 at #2 is "Prop 19 creates several new cannabis related crimes with extremely severe penalties. Don’t pass a joint to a 17 year old, you will be looking at a max of 7 years in state prison, seriously. " SERIOUSLY?!
With these kind of arguments winning over people against a historic legislation, I don't think it'll ever pass.
"Oh well I still have my card derp derp." Fools.
- 7,122
- 1,149
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2003
big business won.
- 7,122
- 1,149
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2003
big business won.
- 10,490
- 229
- Joined
- May 2, 2001
+
http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/jtf/JTF_LikelyVotersJTF.pdf
18-34 -- Not registered to vote - 49%
...and there you go.
- 10,490
- 229
- Joined
- May 2, 2001
+
http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/jtf/JTF_LikelyVotersJTF.pdf
18-34 -- Not registered to vote - 49%
...and there you go.
- 2,744
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
dam senior citizens!Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
+
http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/jtf/JTF_LikelyVotersJTF.pdf
18-34 -- Not registered to vote - 49%
...and there you go.
- 2,744
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
dam senior citizens!Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
+
http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/jtf/JTF_LikelyVotersJTF.pdf
18-34 -- Not registered to vote - 49%
...and there you go.
b smooth 202
Banned
- 10,295
- 106
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2004
we'll be back
b smooth 202
Banned
- 10,295
- 106
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2004
we'll be back
sneakaprince
Supporter
- 16,497
- 20,220
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
I have no doubts about it passing in 2012....
sneakaprince
Supporter
- 16,497
- 20,220
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
I have no doubts about it passing in 2012....
- 10,490
- 229
- Joined
- May 2, 2001
you can look to the youth too...Originally Posted by StonedFace
dam senior citizens!Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
+
http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/jtf/JTF_LikelyVotersJTF.pdf
18-34 -- Not registered to vote - 49%
...and there you go.
- 10,490
- 229
- Joined
- May 2, 2001
you can look to the youth too...Originally Posted by StonedFace
dam senior citizens!Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
+
http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/jtf/JTF_LikelyVotersJTF.pdf
18-34 -- Not registered to vote - 49%
...and there you go.
