The Official NBA PG Thread

[jmause3]

nice list KLJ

 

[jmause3]

nice list KLJ

 

[buc em]

Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1

Maybe I'm too high on the guy but I think the potential is there by the end of the season for Jrue to be in that young and good group

He could be man but he has absolute #+%% for talent around him. He has no shooters and no big men except Brand. So basically he has no one to finish his passes except Thad and Brand. And he has to share bringing up the ball with Turner and Lou a lot of times. Basically it's time to trade Iguodala and whatever other tradeable assets on that team cuz they're going no where real fast. They need to build around Jrue at this point.

 

[buc em]

Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1

Maybe I'm too high on the guy but I think the potential is there by the end of the season for Jrue to be in that young and good group

He could be man but he has absolute #+%% for talent around him. He has no shooters and no big men except Brand. So basically he has no one to finish his passes except Thad and Brand. And he has to share bringing up the ball with Turner and Lou a lot of times. Basically it's time to trade Iguodala and whatever other tradeable assets on that team cuz they're going no where real fast. They need to build around Jrue at this point.

 

[bangdak]

Jrue is the goods. Ive been real high on him.



And i like KLJ's tier rankings, although i dont necessarily agree with the rankings within those tiers, but it's do-able.

 

[bangdak]

Jrue is the goods. Ive been real high on him.



And i like KLJ's tier rankings, although i dont necessarily agree with the rankings within those tiers, but it's do-able.

 

[jehlers02]

Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.

I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.

He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.

I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.

Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...

 

[jehlers02]

Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.

I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.

He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.

I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.

Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...

 

[seymore cake]

^ See its just the opposite, most feel as though he gets over hyped because of that 55. No one expects him to do that again honestly.

 

[seymore cake]

^ See its just the opposite, most feel as though he gets over hyped because of that 55. No one expects him to do that again honestly.

 

[henz0]

Wall had 9 assists 0 to's at half

 

[henz0]

Wall had 9 assists 0 to's at half

 

[hymen man]

Gumby is def. overrated.

 

[hymen man]

Gumby is def. overrated.

 

[airmaxpenny1]

Russy again continues to be a %%$%$++ assassin...Thinking about all that really good NBA talent that was on those Final 4 UCLA squads it's amazing they didn't find a way to win 1 of those.

 

[airmaxpenny1]

Russy again continues to be a %%$%$++ assassin...Thinking about all that really good NBA talent that was on those Final 4 UCLA squads it's amazing they didn't find a way to win 1 of those.

 

[dland24]

Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1

Russy again continues to be a %%$%$++ assassin...Thinking about all that really good NBA talent that was on those Final 4 UCLA squads it's amazing they didn't find a way to win 1 of those.

Kept running into Florida man.  Ben Howland is a defensive minded coach too.  You didnt see the offense out of Westbrook and Collison that you now see in the NBA (weird how that works).  Russ was a beast, but Howland didnt really let him go crazy.  Those UCLA teams were so fun to watch.  I have no doubt in my mind UCLA was talented enough to have won a ship one of those years.

 

[dland24]

Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1

Russy again continues to be a %%$%$++ assassin...Thinking about all that really good NBA talent that was on those Final 4 UCLA squads it's amazing they didn't find a way to win 1 of those.

Kept running into Florida man.  Ben Howland is a defensive minded coach too.  You didnt see the offense out of Westbrook and Collison that you now see in the NBA (weird how that works).  Russ was a beast, but Howland didnt really let him go crazy.  Those UCLA teams were so fun to watch.  I have no doubt in my mind UCLA was talented enough to have won a ship one of those years.

 

[dland24]

Originally Posted by Jehlers02

Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.

I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.

He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.

I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.

Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...

Did YOU even realize that Curry dropped a 36 point triple double last year?  He gets no credit for that?  Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it....

 

[dland24]

Originally Posted by Jehlers02

Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.

I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.

He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.

I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.

Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...

Did YOU even realize that Curry dropped a 36 point triple double last year?  He gets no credit for that?  Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it....

 

[mayhemmonkey000]

Originally Posted by Jehlers02

Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.

I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.

He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.

I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.

Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...

It's true.

 

[mayhemmonkey000]

Originally Posted by Jehlers02

Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.

I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.

He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.

I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.

Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...

It's true.

 

[franchise 55]

Originally Posted by dland24

Originally Posted by Jehlers02

Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.

I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.

He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.

I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.

Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...

Did YOU even realize that Curry dropped a 36 point triple double last year?  He gets no credit for that?  Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it....

Exactly what I was going to write.

 

[franchise 55]

Originally Posted by dland24

Originally Posted by Jehlers02

Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.

I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.

He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.

I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.

Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...

Did YOU even realize that Curry dropped a 36 point triple double last year?  He gets no credit for that?  Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it....

Exactly what I was going to write.

 

[addict4sneakers]

Originally Posted by dland24

Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1

Russy again continues to be a %%$%$++ assassin...Thinking about all that really good NBA talent that was on those Final 4 UCLA squads it's amazing they didn't find a way to win 1 of those.

Kept running into Florida man.  Ben Howland is a defensive minded coach too.  You didnt see the offense out of Westbrook and Collison that you now see in the NBA (weird how that works).  Russ was a beast, but Howland didnt really let him go crazy.  Those UCLA teams were so fun to watch.  I have no doubt in my mind UCLA was talented enough to have won a ship one of those years.

plus corey brewer was absolutely locking up afflalo