- 6,993
- 80
nice list KLJ
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
Maybe I'm too high on the guy but I think the potential is there by the end of the season for Jrue to be in that young and good group
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
Maybe I'm too high on the guy but I think the potential is there by the end of the season for Jrue to be in that young and good group
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
Russy again continues to be a %%$%$++ assassin...Thinking about all that really good NBA talent that was on those Final 4 UCLA squads it's amazing they didn't find a way to win 1 of those.
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
Russy again continues to be a %%$%$++ assassin...Thinking about all that really good NBA talent that was on those Final 4 UCLA squads it's amazing they didn't find a way to win 1 of those.
Originally Posted by Jehlers02
Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.
I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.
He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.
I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.
Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...
Originally Posted by Jehlers02
Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.
I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.
He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.
I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.
Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...
It's true.Originally Posted by Jehlers02
Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.
I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.
He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.
I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.
Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...
It's true.Originally Posted by Jehlers02
Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.
I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.
He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.
I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.
Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...
Exactly what I was going to write.Originally Posted by dland24
Originally Posted by Jehlers02
Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.
I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.
He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.
I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.
Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...
Did YOU even realize that Curry dropped a 36 point triple double last year? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it....
Exactly what I was going to write.Originally Posted by dland24
Originally Posted by Jehlers02
Im trying to be as least biased as possible. I will not say who is better between Jennings and Curry because i think its close. But everyone here is saying its clear cut that Curry is better which is something that i completely disagree with. I think they right on the same level.
I feel like every hates on Jennings cause he dropped 55. Everyone was kinda spoiled by such a great rookie performance that they expected him to do something great again, and again.
He didnt drop rediculous numbers since then but he did take a horrible 20 win Bucks team to the playoffs the very next year. I believe it was one of this biggest differences in wins from one season to the next. That was mainly because of Jennings.
He didnt just take the bucks to the playoffs, he lead them to a very very unlikely game 7 without the best player Bogut. Jennings had 20+ points 3 times i think in that series. Pretty good for a rookie.
I kinda feel like there's a little more love towards Curry because of the amount of Bay Area fans on here compared to Milwaukee fans. Which is reasonable to be biased cause im biased too as i'm from Milwaukee. But im not gonna say its a definate Jennings > Curry or Curry > Jennings. Ya'll are saying no questions asked Curry is better. I completely disagree, i think they are neck and neck.
Did anyone even realize that Jennings just dropped a 20 point triple double? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it...
Did YOU even realize that Curry dropped a 36 point triple double last year? He gets no credit for that? Or is it not that impressive because he didnt drop 55 while doing it....
plus corey brewer was absolutely locking up afflaloOriginally Posted by dland24
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
Russy again continues to be a %%$%$++ assassin...Thinking about all that really good NBA talent that was on those Final 4 UCLA squads it's amazing they didn't find a way to win 1 of those.
Kept running into Florida man. Ben Howland is a defensive minded coach too. You didnt see the offense out of Westbrook and Collison that you now see in the NBA (weird how that works). Russ was a beast, but Howland didnt really let him go crazy. Those UCLA teams were so fun to watch. I have no doubt in my mind UCLA was talented enough to have won a ship one of those years.