- Jan 8, 2006
- 30,560
- 33,906
This is where I have to disagree with you. He played a significant role in an all-time great offense. You can't just stick any role player in for him and expect the same results.
I personally think Draymond and Chuck are both petty and insecure in their own respective ways. Charles is jealous that Draymond is making more than he ever did so he uses the crutch (and truth) that he is a better player. Draymond is mad that Barkley insults him so he lets the Ringz Culture get to his head and uses the crutch (and truth) that he has three rings while Chuck has zero.
Chuck is Top XX player all-time, 5X 1st Team All-NBA, 5x 2nd Team All-NBA, 11X All-Star and LEAGUE MVP.
Draymond was a vital piece in three championship runs, 3X 1st Team Defense, 2x 2nd Team Defense. 1x All-NBA Second Team, 1x All-NBA Third Team, 3x All-Star and LEAGUE DPOY.
Both had played in different eras with different roles and different salary caps. Why can't they both considered exceptional basketball players for what was asked of them?
How dare you use logic in here