This Footy Thread is Now Closed, New Thread Link on Last page

Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree and don't really care about the fees anymore but man you dudes brought up pogbas fee every chance you got last season and now wanna try and justify the fees.

Also, peps spending should be noted.. mans keep telling me how great city's academy is and then they turn around and spend 30-40 on a back up fb in danilo. Why not promote one of those kids? it's becoming apparent that pep's "track record" for developing youth is about as exaggerated as mourinhos "track record" of not trusting them.
 
Pogba fee was brought up because he had a lackluster season and Juve did better without him.

Again, we haven't talked about him in ages but you guys keep bringing it up.
 
Personally i've criticized other City fans before for hyping up our academy when its no reason to yet. I still think Pep is good with young players in general and I would love to see academy kids given a chance but if he and the others who see the youth train everyday since they have taken over and think they aren't ready I will trust their judgement people should temper their expectations with academy products.

Also It's a catch 22 if he takes the time to fully develop players from the academy we risk not competing for the level of trophies we should and then he would be criticized for not winning like we should be expecting to. He is in a place where he has to set up our squad for the future and compete to win now and I think he has done a good job at that with the players being brought in.
 
Pogba fee was brought up because he had a lackluster season and Juve did better without him.

Again, we haven't talked about him in ages but you guys keep bringing it up.
Yet statistically he had his best season and was top mf in the league. And again, we brought it up to point out the inconsistency on this forum and its relevance to this conversation
 
Yeah, when clubs pay 50m for a player you guys love saying "but Pogba was expensive huh?"

Ugh yeah he was, you guys paid more than double of that for him.
 
Yeah, when clubs pay 50m for a player you guys love saying "but Pogba was expensive huh?"

Ugh yeah he was, you guys paid more than double of that for him.
Trey you negating Half the point. It's 50 for a fb, when mans got slaughtered for paying 80 for a mf. Both make sense in this market, yet some of you will only justify one because of obvious bias

It's the same with kieta.. pool fans urging their club to drop 75 , yet he is half the player pogba is.
 
Trey you legit watch kieta and then pogba and think they are even remotely close in quality? I'm done with you man..

I'm am going to be completely honest, I have never watched Keita play. But half the player? His stats are very solid:
Screen shot 2017-07-22 at 2.25.05 PM.png
 
You know.. I'll be honest half the player might have been an exaggeration, especially since I actually rate him BUT how can fans justify 75 for kieta and in the same breath say 90 for pogba (arguably? better player then kieta at time of transfer) is too much? Both make sense in current market

You'll have to excuse me.. not sure how well I'm making my point. I'm currently trying to pack for Hawaii and breaking up my two sons from trying to kill each other. Hence my nevermind post
 
DFXDwjOXUAwuy2C.jpg:large

Fell like im losing the yang to my yin the joker to my batman. As stressful as he had been the past couple seasons gonna miss this winger trapped in a fullbacks body his first few years he did a good job at leftback often and he held it down as an emergency CB this past season.
Goodluck with Roma Kolarov
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom