- 2,078
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2009
the width of the hole in pentagon isnt in line with size of plane. if a plane takes out 3 steel buildings then pentagon should have far more damage. things not adding up on that end. and yeah for it to be the pentagon the lack of evidence is funny.Originally Posted by A Beautiful Wave
Originally Posted by bijald0331
In 2008, ZdenÄk P. Bažant, Professor of Civil Engineering and Materials Science at Northwestern University, published with three coauthors a paper to examine whether allegations of controlled demolition might be scientifically justifiable. They found that the available video records are not consistent with the free fall hypothesis, that the size of the concrete particles is consistent with comminution caused by impact, and that the high velocity of compressed air explains why material from the towers were ejected to a distance of several hundred meters from the tower. The authors conclude that the allegations of controlled demolition do not have any scientific merit.[46] A spokesman for NIST said that any sightings of molten metal, including metal seen pouring from the South tower, were likely molten aluminum from the airplane, an explanation disputed by Richard Gage who stated that the colour of the molten metal rules out aluminum.[47] "Basically, gravity and the utter force of the upper floors forced the towers down," said NIST spokesperson Michael Newman.
I'm undergrad Illuminati though so take it FWIW.
http://www.scribd.com/doc...72/9-11-Engineering-View
What about the pentagon? The worlds most secure building with not 1 video camera??? And a "pilot" who took some cessna lessons able to control a 757 near max speed (500mph) 30 feet above the ground hitting the building at almost a straight angle?
The 9/11 report is a joke as well and people in that committee admit that, no mention of building 7 either...
I don't think you understand we are dealing with !!%+ Cheney Here.