- 22,885
- 2,317
I do not want them to hit the record
Last edited:
Warriors Haters & Steph Curry Haters Call To Arms (Haters Unification Thread) VOL WHY NOT?
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by finallyfamous,
- Start date
- 40,877
- 46,985
- 8,906
- 2,685
- 37,287
- 19,666
- 17,244
- 24,154
So real. We all know someone like this IRL too
- 5,858
- 1,758
I really thought the Warriors were going to break our record but feels to now know they won't! 
Outchea last night getting exposed like a MF! Coach Mitch came with that playoff ball. That was their championship
I highly doubt warriors repeat.
Outchea last night getting exposed like a MF! Coach Mitch came with that playoff ball. That was their championship
I highly doubt warriors repeat.
- 3,969
- 535
Pippem on first take was asked how his 1996 Bulls would do against the current Warriors. He made it clear thar they would have swept them.
Basically, the Warriors are not used to score that easily against a top team from the 1990s who invested much more in defensive plays and boxing outs. The defense the warriors play are pathetic. MJ would have dunked and made more layups than he did because of the slacky defense of todays game.
Basically, the Warriors are not used to score that easily against a top team from the 1990s who invested much more in defensive plays and boxing outs. The defense the warriors play are pathetic. MJ would have dunked and made more layups than he did because of the slacky defense of todays game.
- 22,885
- 2,317
Even if the Warriors match the record will anyone really think of them as a top three all time team? Just doesn't feel like they are...(shrug)
- 8,906
- 2,685
They arent.
- 53,484
- 21,063
Someone brought up the point that the bulls never swept anyone in the finals. I don't think they would get a sweep.
- 17,244
- 24,154
Which makes chasing this record even more pointless.
And didn't the Bulls go like 16-2 in the playoffs too? They'd still have to at least match that to be on that level.
- 4,458
- 1,609
Why? What you "feel" doesn't go with the facts though from the last two years.
If they beat both the Spurs (who are an all time great team) and a fully loaded Cavs team then yes they are all time great.
- 17,244
- 24,154
Ok. Bulls went 15-3. Forgot they lost a game to the Knicks and 1st round was a best of 5.
So real record is 87-13. Good luck chasing that...
So real record is 87-13. Good luck chasing that...
- 53,484
- 21,063
I mean their record speaks for itself and how they gave the rest of the league headaches. What else did they have to do to be an all time great team?
- 4,458
- 1,609
Ok. Bulls went 15-3. Forgot they lost a game to the Knicks and 1st round was a best of 5.
So real record is 87-13. Good luck chasing that...
It doesn't matter. If they match or not y'all will still find something to discredit them by.
NO ONE was talking about rule changes, hand checking, or the "legitimacy" three point line until this year.
- 17,244
- 24,154
Well you are in a hating thread.Ok. Bulls went 15-3. Forgot they lost a game to the Knicks and 1st round was a best of 5.
So real record is 87-13. Good luck chasing that...
It doesn't matter. If they match or not y'all will still find something to discredit them by.
NO ONE was talking about rule changes, hand checking, or the "legitimacy" three point line until this year.
We're gonna find any slander to fit our narrative.
Might be best you unsub
- 22,885
- 2,317
I don't know, more HOFers....more 'legendary' series'/rivalries that are remembered forever...better competition (not their fault). Just saying I don't think they will be ranked with the top of the top. Maybe I'm wrong
- 8,906
- 2,685
Too many Laker squads and other squads were better and had stiffer competition. In this era this squad is nice though
If they hit 70+, drop the Clippers, Spurs and Cavs to repeat as champs, with the back to back MVP, I mean.....
They're 60 games over .500 and being mocked internet wide. Perspective getting blurry it seems.
- 22,885
- 2,317
I understand the flaws in my thoughts
But if I'm 'matching up' all time great teams, I have a handful in front
(If they win)
But if I'm 'matching up' all time great teams, I have a handful in front
(If they win)
I don't mean just you tho, didn't mean to sound like that, was just using your quote in general is all.
If they run off 3-4 Titles, Steph, Klay, Draymond could become All Time HOFers. This could be the start, or maybe they do drop off.
History takes time and reflection. Asking if they belong before the playoffs even begin is a lil too soon.
What if they 16-0 the playoffs? After a 70-71-72 win season? If they lose in Rd 2, then yeah, they "suck".
If they run off 3-4 Titles, Steph, Klay, Draymond could become All Time HOFers. This could be the start, or maybe they do drop off.
History takes time and reflection. Asking if they belong before the playoffs even begin is a lil too soon.
What if they 16-0 the playoffs? After a 70-71-72 win season? If they lose in Rd 2, then yeah, they "suck".
- 7,884
- 2,014
Some of the stuff I'm reading in here .
.
- 22,885
- 2,317
No doubt CP, time and reflection is needed for all time great arguments
- 8,906
- 2,685
This is the Warriors haters thread so all outlandish slander will be appreciated
- 44,651
- 17,015
Yea man, there is no room for his "Facts" in hurWell you are in a hating thread.It doesn't matter. If they match or not y'all will still find something to discredit them by.Ok. Bulls went 15-3. Forgot they lost a game to the Knicks and 1st round was a best of 5.
So real record is 87-13. Good luck chasing that...
NO ONE was talking about rule changes, hand checking, or the "legitimacy" three point line until this year.
We're gonna find any slander to fit our narrative.
Might be best you unsub
This aint the logicked thread
