WELCOME TO THE MARVEL MULTIVERSE -*RIP STAN LEE & Boseman* - Deadpool & Wolverine = 07/26/24

My dude QS. Done dirty.

D.C. Has a million speedsters with their own books and all. But, QS can't get any love.

Did they ever have a QS and Scarlett book?
That would be a dope series I think.

I still have hopes we see Pietro
 
they probably just wanted to get be done with Quicksilver as to not help promote any XFilms
 
I don't really miss QS. I don't see where they could have taken his character after AOU. If he lived he's just be clinging onto Scarlett Witch. 
 
would have been interesting how they pulled him off in CW but I wouldn't be surprised if that is one reason they also didn't want him around
 
Last edited:
James Gunn wrestles with changing canon for Guardians Vol. 3

Even before Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 opened in theaters a few weeks ago, James Gunn was already attached to write and direct a follow-up to conclude the trilogy and even revealed he had already begun writing the sequel. Speaking at the World Building panel (via Cinema Blend) at this year’s E3, Gunn opened up about his progress and a change he’s considering making for a story he wants to tell.

“I’m writing Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 and I finished the first draft of the treatment yesterday, which I’m excited about it and I feel really great about it. But there’s one little thing that I had in the first movie… Now, Marvel, MCU canon is crazy and I’ll get super geeky for two seconds. There’s the 616 universe which is the Marvel Comics Universe, which people get hung up on that canon, and then there’s the MCU, The Marvel Cinematic Universe, which has a separate canon which is inspired by but not exactly the same as the 616. I did something in the first movie of Guardians where it was in the background but it was distinctly there, and people know that it’s there. And I’m like goddammit because I have a really good storytelling reason for breaking the canon, and I stayed up last night figuring out if I’m gonna do it or not. I still don’t know.”

When pressed, by none other than talking tree-opponent Neil deGrasse Tyson, Gunn revealed the detail stems from details in the background of the first film.

“I’ll actually tell you. In the first movie there is the mugshot sequence where the characters go through and they’re going through the mugshots and having their picture taken and the Nova Corps has information about each of the characters coming up on their little machinery. Now, those things are something that your average viewer doesn’t see at all and doesn’t read, but there’s a lot of background I put into those things about who they’ve worked with, where they’re from, what’s going on. And it’s one of those things that I’m thinking about changing.”

Within the context of the scene Gunn mentioned, there are a couple of different things detailed about the characters, such as specifics about their different augmentations, but only a few things that seem like they would keep Gunn up at night. Some of those potential details include: Gamora as “last survivor of the Zehoberei People,” Rocket’s origin on Halfworld and his association with “Lylla” (both of which are from the pages of Marvel comics), or potentially Groot’s origin of X (a reference to his Planet X origin in the comics) and his own association with an unknown “Tibius Lark.” We’re not sure which of these (or another unnamed piece of info) Gunn is wrestling with and we’ll likely have to wait until 2020 for the answer.
Click to expand...
 
Ummmmm.. so I saw this pop up when i opened YouTube.. and figured everyone is entitled to their opinion and let me see why they feel the need to even put this video out there

I don't think I've seen or heard the opinion of anyone who isn't/wasn't hyped.. not that I expect everyone to be, not everyone is going feel the same way about everything.. but the response to the teaser seemed to be overwhelmingly positive

I found some of the comments a bit odd






Their initial review (haven't watched this):

 
Last edited:
Yup.. comments seem extremely convenient.. their review video starts off talking about the CG in the car scene being the worst ever for marvel

IM1 was '08, marvel has had their fair amount of movies and trailers for those movies to date.. seems kinda convenient to say that short scene at the very end of the teaser is the "worst" on immediate viewing
 
Mr Cashfl0w said:
His opinion lost all value once he said Thor: Dark World was a good movie
Click to expand...

Didn't even get that far..

Just seemed a little odd, the hyperbole used.. "worst ever"

Not to pick on cap, but I vividly remember couple things from TFA just being off
 
Eh if the guy didn't like the trailer that's cool. It's not like it was the greatest thing.

But Grace being all judgmental. That's just stupid.
 
I've been reading the recent run of BP so I have some sort of knowledge. I find comic book movies more enjoyable when you catch all the Easter eggs and references.


But I think I should take it back a few years. Any recommendations?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom