- 87,787
- 50,225
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
There's a chance.I've accepted the fact the X-Men movies are what they are.
But they're wasting it. Can you imagine 1st class X-Men in the MCU? A small Hugh Jackman Wolvie spot? The world would end for us.
I really just want to see Jackman in the MCU...But that'll never happen
Jackman gave up being Wolverine not superhero movies.
He can show up as Count Neferia, US Agent, Quasar, etc.
Kang is also Rama Tut (I think that's his name) the pharaoh that enslaved Apicalypse and also fought the Fantastic 4 in the Fantastic comic.F4 would be cool to see in an Avenger movie. Don't want a solo. I just want Kang.
I've said this multiple times over the years in here but Kang is the perfect follow up villain to Thanos (unless we got Doom of course).
We've talked about in the past and Fiege has commented on it, but I still feel Kang should be fair game just like QS and SW. Appeared first in Avengers, not F4. But I don't know how that actually works.
Chronologically, he was Rama Tut, then the Scarlet Centurion (I think), and then he became Kang the Conqueror in the 40th century.
His name is Nathaniel Richards. Hes not the Nathaniel Richards. Its 3both century so he's not even directly related but they've dropped hints in comics that the reason Lang doesn't just kill certain Avengers is cuz it'd prevent his birth. From Tony Stark to Dr. Doom.Yeah, I'm so confused right now.I'm sure they'd streamline it for his first appearance, but yeah it's naturally going to become convoluted when time travel is at the very core of his character That doesn't even begin to take Immortus into account. Or Iron Lad. Definitely blows the universe wide open in regards to alternate futures, realities, and the multiverse though.
So he's Nathaniel Richards from the 30th century. Huh? lol