- 120
- 10
Quick question. DAME or JAY-Z? Who owns the masters...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by damnneardeadstock
it's 50/50, jay owns the lyrics but dame owns the music itself. it's kinda effed up.
dame wants to put out a mixtape made a long time ago featuring ROC artists doin songs like politics as usual, dead presidents, etc. dudes like cam and memphis bleek are on there. i dunno if it'll ever drop.
I believe that album initially dropped on Priority Records before they inked a deal with Def Jam.Originally Posted by ImmaGetMine
i thought when jay got the job at def jam all that %%%* went with it? i thought rocafella owned them?
ALLHIPHOP.COM:
Biggs, Dame and Jay are all co-owners of the Reasonable Doubt album.
Originally Posted by Skip2MyLou23
What rights does owning the masters give? What exactly are "masters"? I imagine some CDs or computer files or something.
Its true that has a big play in the break up.Jay felt like he deserved the full masters of his best work.Originally Posted by illphillip
A couple of things.....
sneakergod, Rocafella is the record company, so they do own the masters. Dame, Jay and Biggs own Rocafella.
All19, that's a strange statement. I don't know if that's you or Jay talking.
What does being "cool" have to do with anything? If they were so "cool", why would Jay even ask them for the masters if they co-own them. Would you just hand something you own over to another man because you're "cool"?
I mean, if the three of them ALWAYS owned RD, why should Biggs and Dame suddenly just hand over their stake?
And is using the name Biggs and Dame helped build (Rocafella) as a negotiating ploy against them a "cool" move?
Ownership of an album isn't just about who kicked rhymes on them. A LOT goes into making an album. Someone financed it, a+r'd it, adminstrated it. Marketed and promoted it.
I think you can see that just because you can step in a booth doesn't mean you can make a great album.
I knew that was going to be your first question. Like, I'm not in the business to talk about guys I did business with-I want you to print all this-been real tight with, for over 10 years. But since there's so much out there, so much has been said, I will say this one thing: I'ma just ask the people in the world to put themselves in my shoes. However the situation happened, whether we outgrew the situation or what have you, it was time for me to seek a new deal in the situation. While I was doing that, I was gonna leave Roc-A-Fella Records, and if anybody can imagine building something from nothing, and being the main driving force for that, and then having to leave all your legacy and everything behind, I know that'd be a tough situation for anyone. While I was seeking out another deal, whether it was with the S. Carter Records or what have you, there was a deal on the table to be the president of Def Jam, continue running Roc-A-Fella, CEO-president of Roc-A-Fella also, and get all my masters back. But since I was the one that wanted to leave, I was like, let me try to figure out some way where everyone can be happy. So I said, let me have Reasonable Doubt. It's not a money thing. Reasonable Doubt, if you look at it, it sells, whatever it sells in catalog. Maybe a hundred thousand a year. It's very little money, but it meant everything to me because it was my baby. It was my first one. And it was also more of a principle thing: Just give me something, something to walk. Something to hold on to. I don't wanna walk away from Roc-A-Fella Records-if you can imagine that-with nothing... So I was like, let me get Reasonable Doubt and I'll give up [the rest of] my masters. I'll give up Roc-A-Fella, I'll give up president and CEO of Def Jam Records-everything. Just give me my baby to hold on to so 10 years down the line, I can look back and I got something-I'm not empty-handed. And I was the one being offered everything. I thought it was more than fair... And when that was turned down, I had to make a choice. I'll leave that for the people to say what choice they would've made. That's about it. I don't really wanna talk about Dame or Biggs. I don't have nothing negative to say about them.
Originally Posted by illphillip
A couple of things.....
sneakergod, Rocafella is the record company, so they do own the masters. Dame, Jay and Biggs own Rocafella.
All19, that's a strange statement. I don't know if that's you or Jay talking.
What does being "cool" have to do with anything? If they were so "cool", why would Jay even ask them for the masters if they co-own them. Would you just hand something you own over to another man because you're "cool"?
I mean, if the three of them ALWAYS owned RD, why should Biggs and Dame suddenly just hand over their stake?
And is using the name Biggs and Dame helped build (Rocafella) as a negotiating ploy against them a "cool" move?
Ownership of an album isn't just about who kicked rhymes on them. A LOT goes into making an album. Someone financed it, a+r'd it, adminstrated it. Marketed and promoted it.
I think you can see that just because you can step in a booth doesn't mean you can make a great album.