- 5,560
- 3,841
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2007
Discuss.
Why is the younger brother always more athletic and talented?
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by SplinterMatic319,
- Start date
- 5,560
- 3,841
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2007
Discuss.
- 4,700
- 1,947
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2008
Because he has the older brother to learn from and help him.
- 4,700
- 1,947
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2008
Because he has the older brother to learn from and help him.
- 2,303
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2011
not always true
- 2,303
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2011
not always true
6 Rings G.O.A.T.
Supporter
- 133,411
- 111,530
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2006
The older brother let themself go..
6 Rings G.O.A.T.
Supporter
- 133,411
- 111,530
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2006
The older brother let themself go..
- 26
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2011
+1. There have been cases that I have seen firsthand where parents invest more in the younger child if the first was a disappointment.
- 26
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2011
+1. There have been cases that I have seen firsthand where parents invest more in the younger child if the first was a disappointment.
- 18,851
- 20,447
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2010
Not in my case.
LOCK THREAD
LOCK THREAD
- 18,851
- 20,447
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2010
Not in my case.
LOCK THREAD
LOCK THREAD
- 986
- 12
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
first born is always the experiment
- 986
- 12
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
first born is always the experiment
- 1,310
- 59
- Joined
- May 2, 2011
Not always true, can work both ways. In my case, I am much more athletic then then my brother and I'm the younger one.
- 1,310
- 59
- Joined
- May 2, 2011
Not always true, can work both ways. In my case, I am much more athletic then then my brother and I'm the younger one.
- 286
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2004
A book was actually written about how the older/first child usually becomes more successful then the younger siblings. I think the guy was just generalizing off of big name celebrities tho
- 286
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2004
A book was actually written about how the older/first child usually becomes more successful then the younger siblings. I think the guy was just generalizing off of big name celebrities tho
phen0m
Banned
- 1,149
- 82
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2009
I'm 5 years older than my brother, heavier, and i'm much quicker, more agile, better balance etc. 6'3 200 vs 6'5 215. He "looks" more athletic though.
phen0m
Banned
- 1,149
- 82
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2009
I'm 5 years older than my brother, heavier, and i'm much quicker, more agile, better balance etc. 6'3 200 vs 6'5 215. He "looks" more athletic though.
dallassneakerhead08
Banned
- 3,302
- 69
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2007
Very inaccurate statement OP.
dallassneakerhead08
Banned
- 3,302
- 69
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2007
Very inaccurate statement OP.
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
It always seems like the youngest sibling is always the better athlete...
just off the top of my head: jordan wade rose
just off the top of my head: jordan wade rose
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- 42,963
- 15,346
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
It always seems like the youngest sibling is always the better athlete...
just off the top of my head: jordan wade rose
just off the top of my head: jordan wade rose
- 895
- 16
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
definitely not always true... this was a terrible generalization
Similar threads
