- 20,321
- 18,492
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
Wrestling Thread June 8-14 | 6/12 Smackdown - CM Punk is the New World Champ, Punk vs Jericho
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by 4wrestling,
- Start date
theprocessofbelief
Banned
- 4,967
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2004
HHH = GOAT
That is all.
That is all.
- 7,925
- 914
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2002
I just re-watched ECW, and LOL at Matt Striker comparing Tony Atlas to Eric B and Rakim.
- 1,862
- 88
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2003
where did you read this? I haven't read that anywhere but if trueOriginally Posted by Mr DragonFly Jones
Anti-HHH heads...this is probably gonna piss you off, because supposedly...
Spoiler [+]MVP was gonna win the WWE Championship on Monday and get a short reign, but HHH stopped it and suggested it should go to him or Cena instead..
- 5,132
- 843
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2003
- 7,925
- 914
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2002
LMAO Steiner's mic skills will always be the G.O.A.T.
"He's Fat!"
"I'll Make Him Bleed!"
"He's Fat!"
"I'll Make Him Bleed!"
- 30,184
- 1,991
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2000
MVP doesn't deserve a Heavyweight Title reign. Not yet.
6 Rings G.O.A.T.
Supporter
- 136,124
- 116,923
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2006
- 16,310
- 129
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
Yeah definitely. MVP is still working his way up. So i agree with HHH and what he did.
- 7,925
- 914
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2002
But couldn't you say the same for CM Punk winning the title last year when he cashed in? Punk was still working his way up, and then all of a sudden hebecame champ. It just felt like they rushed that.
- 16,310
- 129
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
CM Punk had a good fan base. IMO he was more marketable then than MVP is now. You're right though it was a bit rushed.
- 30,184
- 1,991
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2000
Agreed. Punk was much more over as a face than MVP currently is. Plus, Punk was on a winning streak. What has MVP done? He lost the US Title. Then lost a PPV match. Winning one match on Raw against Matt Hardy doesn't mean you deserve a WWE Title shot.
- 1,126
- 113
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
Unless you have the Konami code
- 5,722
- 2,235
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2002
Face MVP is trash, Heel MVP is amazing.
I am not going to cut and paste since the dirt site has been screwing up and will probably freeze, but I just read that:
There is a RUMOR going around backstage that Rey Mysterio has given the E his notice. It has not been confirmed and is just a rumor at this point.
I am not going to cut and paste since the dirt site has been screwing up and will probably freeze, but I just read that:
There is a RUMOR going around backstage that Rey Mysterio has given the E his notice. It has not been confirmed and is just a rumor at this point.
- 17,144
- 1,167
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2005
Heck of a rumor
- 51,302
- 41,886
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
Damn, just when his IC Title feud with Y2J was starting to get good...
- 16,310
- 129
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
I thought Rey just signed a new long term deal.
- 74,834
- 24,224
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2008
Vince probably wanted to have Rey's mask burned in the middle of the ring or something. I hope it's not true yet. This Jericho program has beenexcellent so far.
- 30,184
- 1,991
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2000
It wouldn't surprise me with the WWE trying to unmask him and humiliate him just as they did with Vickie.
- 251
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2008
Source: F4Wonline
This past weekend, some people within World Wrestling Entertainment leaked a story to PWInsider saying Batista had suffered a biceps tear. Their story waslater changed to a torn tendon in his left biceps and that it was not a full fledged muscle tear. The webmaster of his official website, Demon-Wrestling.com,soon acknowledged his injury, "confirming" it as a torn tendon.
The webmaster wrote: "We originally thought Dave had a torn muscle (he's been hurt for around 2-3 weeks), but this has now been confirmed as a torntendon."
However, the official WWE website would say differently.
According to their report concerning Batista's injury, he suffered a completely torn left biceps requiring surgery that will keep him out of action for atleast four months - not a torn tendon.
A full fledged muscle tear is much more serious than a tendon tear, so something's clearly not adding up. If he did indeed suffer a torn tendon like hisofficial website is saying, the amount of ring time he would miss would be considerably less.
Among some of the wrestlers, there has been plenty of skepticism over the true severity of his injury. The injury supposedly occurred over three weeks ago, buthe had been working television, pay-per-views, and live events without any sort of tape on his arm whatsoever, let alone showing any signs of an injury. If thebiceps tear was serious, and people within WWE are claiming it was serious enough for him to get surgery two days after his championship victory, it wouldcertainly have been taped up. If the injury was not serious enough to require tape, one would think there would be no need for surgery.
Even partially torn biceps injuries are taped up, but considering WWE is saying he suffered a full fledged muscle tear, it makes the severity of his injury allthe more suspicious.
At Monday's Raw in Lafayette, the wrestlers were told his injury was legitimate and he was having surgery the next day. However, the talk among wrestlersin the locker room is that his injury angle on Raw was a cover-up to have him avoid being suspended due to a violation of the company's drugtesting policy.
For what it's worth, Monday's show was re-written several times during the day and the creative team was given a list of wrestlers not to use for theforeseeable future prior to show time as a result of drug testing held earlier in the day and at shows over the weekend.
WWE covering up a drug test failure with an injury would certainly be a major change of philosophy on how they handle their drug testing policy, and whilethings appear fishy, right now there is no concrete evidence indicating that has happened.
This past weekend, some people within World Wrestling Entertainment leaked a story to PWInsider saying Batista had suffered a biceps tear. Their story waslater changed to a torn tendon in his left biceps and that it was not a full fledged muscle tear. The webmaster of his official website, Demon-Wrestling.com,soon acknowledged his injury, "confirming" it as a torn tendon.
The webmaster wrote: "We originally thought Dave had a torn muscle (he's been hurt for around 2-3 weeks), but this has now been confirmed as a torntendon."
However, the official WWE website would say differently.
According to their report concerning Batista's injury, he suffered a completely torn left biceps requiring surgery that will keep him out of action for atleast four months - not a torn tendon.
A full fledged muscle tear is much more serious than a tendon tear, so something's clearly not adding up. If he did indeed suffer a torn tendon like hisofficial website is saying, the amount of ring time he would miss would be considerably less.
Among some of the wrestlers, there has been plenty of skepticism over the true severity of his injury. The injury supposedly occurred over three weeks ago, buthe had been working television, pay-per-views, and live events without any sort of tape on his arm whatsoever, let alone showing any signs of an injury. If thebiceps tear was serious, and people within WWE are claiming it was serious enough for him to get surgery two days after his championship victory, it wouldcertainly have been taped up. If the injury was not serious enough to require tape, one would think there would be no need for surgery.
Even partially torn biceps injuries are taped up, but considering WWE is saying he suffered a full fledged muscle tear, it makes the severity of his injury allthe more suspicious.
At Monday's Raw in Lafayette, the wrestlers were told his injury was legitimate and he was having surgery the next day. However, the talk among wrestlersin the locker room is that his injury angle on Raw was a cover-up to have him avoid being suspended due to a violation of the company's drugtesting policy.
For what it's worth, Monday's show was re-written several times during the day and the creative team was given a list of wrestlers not to use for theforeseeable future prior to show time as a result of drug testing held earlier in the day and at shows over the weekend.
WWE covering up a drug test failure with an injury would certainly be a major change of philosophy on how they handle their drug testing policy, and whilethings appear fishy, right now there is no concrete evidence indicating that has happened.
- 1,431
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2004
None of that was as bad as Kane losing a match to Mark Henry via bearhug. That was just sad on so many levels.
- 7,925
- 914
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2002
- 2,676
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2007
I thought the exact same thing when I heard about the drug testing. It must be a way of covering it up. I also think making it sound more severeallows them to bring him back as a surprise and that is why they always seem to overestimate injury timesOriginally Posted by sneakerhead24
Source: F4Wonline
This past weekend, some people within World Wrestling Entertainment leaked a story to PWInsider saying Batista had suffered a biceps tear. Their story was later changed to a torn tendon in his left biceps and that it was not a full fledged muscle tear. The webmaster of his official website, Demon-Wrestling.com, soon acknowledged his injury, "confirming" it as a torn tendon.
The webmaster wrote: "We originally thought Dave had a torn muscle (he's been hurt for around 2-3 weeks), but this has now been confirmed as a torn tendon."
However, the official WWE website would say differently.
According to their report concerning Batista's injury, he suffered a completely torn left biceps requiring surgery that will keep him out of action for at least four months - not a torn tendon.
A full fledged muscle tear is much more serious than a tendon tear, so something's clearly not adding up. If he did indeed suffer a torn tendon like his official website is saying, the amount of ring time he would miss would be considerably less.
Among some of the wrestlers, there has been plenty of skepticism over the true severity of his injury. The injury supposedly occurred over three weeks ago, but he had been working television, pay-per-views, and live events without any sort of tape on his arm whatsoever, let alone showing any signs of an injury. If the biceps tear was serious, and people within WWE are claiming it was serious enough for him to get surgery two days after his championship victory, it would certainly have been taped up. If the injury was not serious enough to require tape, one would think there would be no need for surgery.
Even partially torn biceps injuries are taped up, but considering WWE is saying he suffered a full fledged muscle tear, it makes the severity of his injury all the more suspicious.
At Monday's Raw in Lafayette, the wrestlers were told his injury was legitimate and he was having surgery the next day. However, the talk among wrestlers in the locker room is that his injury angle on Raw was a cover-up to have him avoid being suspended due to a violation of the company's drug testing policy.
For what it's worth, Monday's show was re-written several times during the day and the creative team was given a list of wrestlers not to use for the foreseeable future prior to show time as a result of drug testing held earlier in the day and at shows over the weekend.
WWE covering up a drug test failure with an injury would certainly be a major change of philosophy on how they handle their drug testing policy, and while things appear fishy, right now there is no concrete evidence indicating that has happened.
- 1,862
- 88
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2003
I read that also, If true and WWE Trying to send him off like they did vickie dirty Vince is Disgusting.
Vince sent his 2nd Top Heel Vickie Guerrero out in a fashion that was appalling
- 30,184
- 1,991
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2000
Originally Posted by sneakerhead24
Source: F4Wonline
This past weekend, some people within World Wrestling Entertainment leaked a story to PWInsider saying Batista had suffered a biceps tear. Their story was later changed to a torn tendon in his left biceps and that it was not a full fledged muscle tear. The webmaster of his official website, Demon-Wrestling.com, soon acknowledged his injury, "confirming" it as a torn tendon.
The webmaster wrote: "We originally thought Dave had a torn muscle (he's been hurt for around 2-3 weeks), but this has now been confirmed as a torn tendon."
However, the official WWE website would say differently.
According to their report concerning Batista's injury, he suffered a completely torn left biceps requiring surgery that will keep him out of action for at least four months - not a torn tendon.
A full fledged muscle tear is much more serious than a tendon tear, so something's clearly not adding up. If he did indeed suffer a torn tendon like his official website is saying, the amount of ring time he would miss would be considerably less.
Among some of the wrestlers, there has been plenty of skepticism over the true severity of his injury. The injury supposedly occurred over three weeks ago, but he had been working television, pay-per-views, and live events without any sort of tape on his arm whatsoever, let alone showing any signs of an injury. If the biceps tear was serious, and people within WWE are claiming it was serious enough for him to get surgery two days after his championship victory, it would certainly have been taped up. If the injury was not serious enough to require tape, one would think there would be no need for surgery.
Even partially torn biceps injuries are taped up, but considering WWE is saying he suffered a full fledged muscle tear, it makes the severity of his injury all the more suspicious.
At Monday's Raw in Lafayette, the wrestlers were told his injury was legitimate and he was having surgery the next day. However, the talk among wrestlers in the locker room is that his injury angle on Raw was a cover-up to have him avoid being suspended due to a violation of the company's drug testing policy.
For what it's worth, Monday's show was re-written several times during the day and the creative team was given a list of wrestlers not to use for the foreseeable future prior to show time as a result of drug testing held earlier in the day and at shows over the weekend.
WWE covering up a drug test failure with an injury would certainly be a major change of philosophy on how they handle their drug testing policy, and while things appear fishy, right now there is no concrete evidence indicating that has happened.
Dr. James Andrews performed the surgery. I doubt he would risk his name and practice to be part of a WWE storyline.
