- 817
- 743
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2004
Think so. Yes.Is the cracking on the 24 lava print part of the “aged” aesthetic?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Think so. Yes.Is the cracking on the 24 lava print part of the “aged” aesthetic?
Thin midsole paint, no chipping, just sanded off wearing them.i have a DS pair of these what's the issue with this pair midsole paint starting to flake?
Not always but if you put in the footwork lolYou sure about that?
These are a must..
Geez....tough one....it's not obvious that the '24 version is better than the '19.
Because they don’t. They compare it to the previous retro. If you look at the 2008, 2014, and 2019 they’re pretty much identical to each other except maybe the lava color and the eyelet color.How does Nike legit look at an OG pair and compare it to a retro pair and say “yup, nailed it again!”?
Are you for real?I mean, shape of retros is pretty much everything. 24's by a landslide and I hate the aged midsole. 19's look trash.
Fair point. Gotta see in hand, but from pics really hate the yellowing; way more distinct than the reimagined 3s. Though I really like whatever shade you'd call the upper b/c the '19s are so freak'n bright white that it's a little distracting.
I actually think they nailed the vintage look better than almost anything else I’ve seen them do.
It’s basically exactly what an OG shoe from that era would look like if it were somehow still wearable.![]()
![]()
![]()
I actually think they nailed the vintage look better than almost anything else I’ve seen them do.
It’s basically exactly what an OG shoe from that era would look like if it were somehow still wearable.![]()
![]()
![]()