- 1,639
- 10
^^
So you lost because you won?
So you lost because you won?
2009 NFC North Trash Talk Thread...(Time to apologize for talkin crazy Bears fans/S4L3)
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by jpzx,
- Start date
- 8,184
- 10
exactly. nevermind, ignore my previous post
- 4,876
- 10
Referring to the Bengals...
- 4,942
- 8,515
Im very confident in the Pack for these next 2 weeks....we played like !!!#, the players know that....we will be very very sharp heading into the bye after theminnesota game, count on it.
arstyle27
Supporter
- 10,530
- 3,568
Can't wait for Sunday.......
- 12,264
- 51
if ya'll dont beat the seahawks r.i.p season.
- 12,426
- 2,239
hasselbeck even playing?
- 6,614
- 10
I highly doubt he will.
- 9,064
- 1,157
Didn't know the season was 3 games long...
- 12,264
- 51
no chance he does.
- 12,264
- 51
Now you know.....Down 2 games in a division where the leader is most likely only losing 3. Not a good look.
- 9,064
- 1,157
Cause for concern? Yes.
But I mean we can still make the wild card even if we don't win the division. I just want to make the playoffs.
- 29,014
- 4,130
Hasselback career is a wrap...
Every single year we hear about how hes gonna come back off injury and be a top 10-15 QB and all he does is play a few weeks and get his frail %!@ beat up.
IMO hes garbage regardless of health.
Every single year we hear about how hes gonna come back off injury and be a top 10-15 QB and all he does is play a few weeks and get his frail %!@ beat up.
IMO hes garbage regardless of health.
jpzx
Supporter
- 58,452
- 27,883
Chad Clifton-T-Packers Sep. 23 - 2:45 pm et
Coach Mike McCarthy confirmed Wednesday that LT Chad Clifton (ankle) will miss the Packers' next two games, at least.
Aaron Rodgers was undoubtedly hoping Clifton would be back for the Vikings in Week 4, but Clifton's best-case scenario is a Week 6 return (after Green Bay's Week 5 bye). It's not a major concern for Rodgers this Sunday against St. Louis, but Vikes RE Jared Allen is a candidate for a monster Week 4.
Allen is going to feast on Rodgers
- 9,937
- 75
im calling ATLEAST 5 sacks
- 4,876
- 10
Allen is going to feast on Rodgers
Ive been worrying about this since i witnessed week one.
Roll out right everytime is whats gonna need to be done
- 9,064
- 1,157
I wish I had Minnesota's defense on my fantasy team right about now
- 4,876
- 10
^ Why?
Packers do nothing but pick the ball of and score Touchdowns.
This isnt a fluke thing either, they did it all last year. 22 INTs and 7 TD's
I honestly havent seen what the Vikings have done on D though so they could be doing better.
Prolly giving up less points but idk about how many TO's they're forcing.
Packers do nothing but pick the ball of and score Touchdowns.
This isnt a fluke thing either, they did it all last year. 22 INTs and 7 TD's
I honestly havent seen what the Vikings have done on D though so they could be doing better.
Prolly giving up less points but idk about how many TO's they're forcing.
jpzx
Supporter
- 58,452
- 27,883
Sigh...
Packers > Vikings
Happy Jehlers?
Packers > Vikings
Happy Jehlers?
- 29,014
- 4,130
Rodgers didnt get sacked a single time in those games but now these dudes are getting manhandled and now our 1 consistant bookend on the OL is out for multipleweeks.
arstyle27
Supporter
- 10,530
- 3,568
I'm not worried about the Seabirds.
- 4,876
- 10
Haha im not saying the Packers D is better.
This is fantasy football, dont deny they dont pick the ball off and do things with it.
Those stats dont lie.
This is fantasy football, dont deny they dont pick the ball off and do things with it.
Those stats dont lie.
- 9,937
- 75
fixedOriginally Posted by fraij da 5 11
The O was the biggest FRAUD in preseason history
- 4,876
- 10
No, the O-Line.Originally Posted by CasperJr
fixedOriginally Posted by fraij da 5 11
The O was the biggest FRAUD in preseason history
If that O-line cooperates, Rodgers will do work, i garuntee it.
- 4,058
- 11
not to jinx it or anything but the Bears D has been on point thus far with Lovie taking over defensive play calling duties. They are definitley older and thereis no Urlacher but although i know it is early they have DEFINITLEY played the best since we lost Rivera as our DC after those 2 years with just dominating,dominating defense.... hopefully we can keep it up cause i def got faith in Cutler and our O, and its usually the other way around with us
Hopefully they can keep it up and its not a repeat of that year where we went to the superbowl where our O looked like a dominant unit through the 1st 8 or sogames and people were calling Rex Grossman an MVP candiate only to get exposed after that (luckily though we still had a functional tough RBin Tommy Jones andthat was enough to go to the SB behind a dominant defense and one of the best ST units ive ever seen with Robby Gould's kicking, Hester being our entireoffense, Maynard being Maynard, and a ST tackling unit behind Ayabadejo who was a BEAST that would always generate take aways.
)
Hopefully they can keep it up and its not a repeat of that year where we went to the superbowl where our O looked like a dominant unit through the 1st 8 or sogames and people were calling Rex Grossman an MVP candiate only to get exposed after that (luckily though we still had a functional tough RBin Tommy Jones andthat was enough to go to the SB behind a dominant defense and one of the best ST units ive ever seen with Robby Gould's kicking, Hester being our entireoffense, Maynard being Maynard, and a ST tackling unit behind Ayabadejo who was a BEAST that would always generate take aways.
