2010 Camaro on 26's

[al audi]

monday you do go hard at american whips though

what you think about this chevy?

 

[nike hoops21]

Ugly, sits too high.

 

[mr monday niight]

Originally Posted by Al Audi

monday you do go hard at american whips though

what you think about this chevy?

For the price of a vette, i'd twin turbocharge a g35..

vettes are tough, though

 

[nike hoops21]

Ugly, sits too high.

 

[the natural mystic]

Originally Posted by Al Audi

monday you do go hard at american whips though

what you think about this chevy?

That's a beautiful car but I would still prefer this:

I love this thing.

 

[al audi]

yea....

id take a nsx over a vette

 

[mr monday niight]

supra too

 

[greenflame34]

VBEAST

 

[ninjahood]

Originally Posted by The Natural Mystic

Originally Posted by Al Audi

monday you do go hard at american whips though

what you think about this chevy?

That's a beautiful car but I would still prefer this:

I love this thing.

i like NSX's...but da ZR1 eats its food like a sucker gettin herbed on riker's island.

 

[ijumpman]

I guess ghetto knows no limit.

 

[npa07]

The blue 0ne l00Ks clean I'm g0nna thr0w s0me 4's 0n my SS and call it a day

 

[cafinest23]

I'm feeling the camaro but I don't believe it needs rims to look good if I owned one I'd leave it stock. 26's is OD but a nice staggered rimmight look alright.

 

[mfdoom]

Originally Posted by KIDFLY SniperElite007

Horrible chose of rims fam

 

[stangznkickz50]

Originally Posted by sooperhooper

looks like a stupid mustang.

BLASPHEMY

 

[thockey66]

Originally Posted by 10 Piece Nuggets

Basically, you lose HP with bigger, heavier rims. No need for that super scientific explanation.

Basically, you aren't getting it. The 'loss' of horsepower used to find RWHP as calculated by the Dyno is not a real loss. It's areduction in acceleration, but that does NOT mean there is less power being produced.

 

[al audi]

Originally Posted by THockey66

Originally Posted by 10 Piece Nuggets

Basically, you lose HP with bigger, heavier rims. No need for that super scientific explanation.

Basically, you aren't getting it. The 'loss' of horsepower used to find RWHP as calculated by the Dyno is not a real loss. It's a reduction in acceleration, but that does NOT mean there is less power being produced.

 

[hollakid619]

Originally Posted by The Natural Mystic

It looks horrible.

 

[throwedindagame]

Originally Posted by THockey66

Originally Posted by 10 Piece Nuggets

Basically, you lose HP with bigger, heavier rims. No need for that super scientific explanation.

Basically, you aren't getting it. The 'loss' of horsepower used to find RWHP as calculated by the Dyno is not a real loss. It's a reduction in acceleration, but that does NOT mean there is less power being produced.

Pretty much. I had a 2 paragraph post in mind, but you summarized it nicely. People need to realize that measuring "horsepower" at the wheels is notvery scientific. Measure the HP at the engine.


Here's an analogy. A sprinter runs a 4.3 in the 40m dash. Next time, he adds a 20 pound backpack (rims) and runs the 40m dash in 5.1 seconds.

The sprinter is still producing the same output of power because he did not get any stronger between the sprints, however his performance is beingeffected because the same power is now being used to move an object of greater mass.
Super scientific? I guess if high school physics are "super scientific"..........................................

 

[fear the ibis]

Originally Posted by ninjahood

C acura was created to fool people into buyin "luxury hondas"

Yeah and what do you drive? A radio flyer?

 

[jimmybeanz]

do not want

 

[h01yshnik3s]

i love this car and i have a 84 carlo ss. i really want this camaro!!! not with the 24s though.