- 9,064
- 1,157
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2009
Rashied Davis > *
* 2010 NFC North Trash Talk Thread: Green Bay Packers win the Super Bowl *
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by jpzx,
- Start date
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,259
- 25,916
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
K... Greg had a lot of talent around him but I think the surrounding talent of Percy Harvin, Adrian Peterson, Visanthe Shiancoe is better than Donald Driver, James Jones and Ryan Grant. So again.. how is that an excuse?
(I didn't say Jermichael Finley, because he didn't start getting his shine until the latter part of the season)
(I didn't say Jermichael Finley, because he didn't start getting his shine until the latter part of the season)
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,259
- 25,916
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
K... Greg had a lot of talent around him but I think the surrounding talent of Percy Harvin, Adrian Peterson, Visanthe Shiancoe is better than Donald Driver, James Jones and Ryan Grant. So again.. how is that an excuse?
(I didn't say Jermichael Finley, because he didn't start getting his shine until the latter part of the season)
(I didn't say Jermichael Finley, because he didn't start getting his shine until the latter part of the season)
- 4,876
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
Jennings > Rice
Driver > Harvin
Finley > Shiancoe
Jones > Berrian
Nelson > whatever else receiver you have on your team..
Dont try to argue that there's more receiving talent overall in Minnesota. Not only is just Jennings better then Rice, but every other receiver we have is better then all of your receivers.
Again, Jennings has proved he's a very good receiver for 4 years already. Rice had one good year. Thats why im saying Jennings > Rice for now.
Again Rice will probably end up being the better WR within the next two years.
Thats all i got. Thats my opinion and it wont change.
Driver > Harvin
Finley > Shiancoe
Jones > Berrian
Nelson > whatever else receiver you have on your team..
Dont try to argue that there's more receiving talent overall in Minnesota. Not only is just Jennings better then Rice, but every other receiver we have is better then all of your receivers.
Again, Jennings has proved he's a very good receiver for 4 years already. Rice had one good year. Thats why im saying Jennings > Rice for now.
Again Rice will probably end up being the better WR within the next two years.
Thats all i got. Thats my opinion and it wont change.
- 4,876
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
Jennings > Rice
Driver > Harvin
Finley > Shiancoe
Jones > Berrian
Nelson > whatever else receiver you have on your team..
Dont try to argue that there's more receiving talent overall in Minnesota. Not only is just Jennings better then Rice, but every other receiver we have is better then all of your receivers.
Again, Jennings has proved he's a very good receiver for 4 years already. Rice had one good year. Thats why im saying Jennings > Rice for now.
Again Rice will probably end up being the better WR within the next two years.
Thats all i got. Thats my opinion and it wont change.
Driver > Harvin
Finley > Shiancoe
Jones > Berrian
Nelson > whatever else receiver you have on your team..
Dont try to argue that there's more receiving talent overall in Minnesota. Not only is just Jennings better then Rice, but every other receiver we have is better then all of your receivers.
Again, Jennings has proved he's a very good receiver for 4 years already. Rice had one good year. Thats why im saying Jennings > Rice for now.
Again Rice will probably end up being the better WR within the next two years.
Thats all i got. Thats my opinion and it wont change.
- 1,045
- 61
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
you seem to be forgetting someone
- 1,045
- 61
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
you seem to be forgetting someone
- 8,184
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2008
i chuckled
- 8,184
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2008
i chuckled
- 4,876
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
Rice has never played a game along side of Moss, why would i include him.
- 4,876
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
Rice has never played a game along side of Moss, why would i include him.
- 1,045
- 61
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
because you said
If you're talking about last year, use past tense. Even then you can't have it both ways. If Jennings is better than Sidney because he's had a better career, then Shiancoe > Finley and Berrian >>>> Jones
and Moss has a little receiving talent, and happens to be in Minnesota.
If you're talking about last year, use past tense. Even then you can't have it both ways. If Jennings is better than Sidney because he's had a better career, then Shiancoe > Finley and Berrian >>>> Jones
- 1,045
- 61
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
because you said
If you're talking about last year, use past tense. Even then you can't have it both ways. If Jennings is better than Sidney because he's had a better career, then Shiancoe > Finley and Berrian >>>> Jones
and Moss has a little receiving talent, and happens to be in Minnesota.
If you're talking about last year, use past tense. Even then you can't have it both ways. If Jennings is better than Sidney because he's had a better career, then Shiancoe > Finley and Berrian >>>> Jones
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,259
- 25,916
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
How can you use the "only done it for one year" excuse for Greg Jennings being better than Sidney Rice when you have Jermichael Finley over Visanthe Shiancoe?
Explain that to me.
Explain that to me.
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,259
- 25,916
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
How can you use the "only done it for one year" excuse for Greg Jennings being better than Sidney Rice when you have Jermichael Finley over Visanthe Shiancoe?
Explain that to me.
Explain that to me.
- 29,014
- 4,130
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2004
Mannnnn yall just shut up about this +@%% already
.
Start using some damn common sense, like I said before neither Greg or Sid are significantly better than the other... They're both somewhere in the top 7-15 range IMO.
For my money though im taking Greg at this point, Sid's injury hurts his game directly. Gregs route running is close to being elite and hes proven that he can turn simple 7 yd slants into 65 yd TD's... Hes no slouch getting down the field for balls either.
Ive yet to see an actual reason that Sid> Greg other than that he had better numbers last year.
Start using some damn common sense, like I said before neither Greg or Sid are significantly better than the other... They're both somewhere in the top 7-15 range IMO.
For my money though im taking Greg at this point, Sid's injury hurts his game directly. Gregs route running is close to being elite and hes proven that he can turn simple 7 yd slants into 65 yd TD's... Hes no slouch getting down the field for balls either.
Ive yet to see an actual reason that Sid> Greg other than that he had better numbers last year.
- 29,014
- 4,130
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2004
Mannnnn yall just shut up about this +@%% already
.
Start using some damn common sense, like I said before neither Greg or Sid are significantly better than the other... They're both somewhere in the top 7-15 range IMO.
For my money though im taking Greg at this point, Sid's injury hurts his game directly. Gregs route running is close to being elite and hes proven that he can turn simple 7 yd slants into 65 yd TD's... Hes no slouch getting down the field for balls either.
Ive yet to see an actual reason that Sid> Greg other than that he had better numbers last year.
Start using some damn common sense, like I said before neither Greg or Sid are significantly better than the other... They're both somewhere in the top 7-15 range IMO.
For my money though im taking Greg at this point, Sid's injury hurts his game directly. Gregs route running is close to being elite and hes proven that he can turn simple 7 yd slants into 65 yd TD's... Hes no slouch getting down the field for balls either.
Ive yet to see an actual reason that Sid> Greg other than that he had better numbers last year.
- 58,161
- 29,603
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
Mannnnn yall just shut up about this +@%% already.
- 58,161
- 29,603
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
Mannnnn yall just shut up about this +@%% already.
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,259
- 25,916
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
Better hands, better ball skills, can go up and get any ball you throw to him, decent down field blocker, great field awareness. You asked.
Still waiting for an answer from Jehlers02. How can he use the "only done it for one year" excuse for Greg Jennings being better than Sidney Rice when you have Jermichael Finley over Visanthe Shiancoe?
Still waiting for an answer from Jehlers02. How can he use the "only done it for one year" excuse for Greg Jennings being better than Sidney Rice when you have Jermichael Finley over Visanthe Shiancoe?
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,259
- 25,916
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
Better hands, better ball skills, can go up and get any ball you throw to him, decent down field blocker, great field awareness. You asked.
Still waiting for an answer from Jehlers02. How can he use the "only done it for one year" excuse for Greg Jennings being better than Sidney Rice when you have Jermichael Finley over Visanthe Shiancoe?
Still waiting for an answer from Jehlers02. How can he use the "only done it for one year" excuse for Greg Jennings being better than Sidney Rice when you have Jermichael Finley over Visanthe Shiancoe?
- 8,184
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2008
Your first sentence described Greg perfectly tho.
He has some of the best hands around
He has some of the best hands around
- 8,184
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2008
Your first sentence described Greg perfectly tho.
He has some of the best hands around
He has some of the best hands around
- 4,876
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
Jermichael Finley and Shaincoe aint even debatable
Rice and Jennings is.
Shaincoe had 2 good years. 2008 and 2009.
2008 - Finley already has half the receptions the first 4 games this year, then Shaincoe did all of 2008..
2009 - Finley had one less reception but over a 100 yards more then Shaincoe, and Finley only started 10 games.
You cant even made the career argument for shaincoe cause he had like 6 seasons with 10 receptions or less
..no seriously
[table][tr][td]Season[/td][td]Team[/td][td]
[/td][td]Receiving[/td][td]Rushing[/td][td]Fumbles[/td][/tr][tr][td]G[/td][td]GS[/td][td]Rec[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]Att[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]FUM[/td][td]Lost[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2006 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]12[/td][td]81[/td][td]6.8[/td][td]16[/td][td]0[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2005 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 5 [/td] [td]8[/td][td]91[/td][td]11.4[/td][td]17[/td][td]0[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2004 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 7 [/td] [td]5[/td][td]25[/td][td]5.0[/td][td]9[/td][td]1[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2003 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 7 [/td] [td]10[/td][td]56[/td][td]5.6[/td][td]10[/td][td]2[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][/table]
I see what your saying though about Finley and Shaincoe, i just think Jennings and Rice is a bit more debatable.
I am well aware now that Moss changes alot, but we are talking about Rice and Jennings careers up to this point.
Totally disregarding Finley and Shaincoe though, can any of you Vikings fans at least see where im coming from?
Greg Jennings
[table][tr][td]Season[/td][td]Team[/td][td]
[/td][td]Receiving[/td][td]Rushing[/td][td]Fumbles[/td][/tr][tr][td]G[/td][td]GS[/td][td]Rec[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]Att[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]FUM[/td][td]Lost[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2010 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]12[/td][td]161[/td][td]13.4[/td][td]32T[/td][td]3[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2009 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td]68[/td][td]1,113[/td][td]16.4[/td][td]83T[/td][td]4[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2008 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 15 [/td] [td]80[/td][td]1,292[/td][td]16.2[/td][td]63[/td][td]9[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2007 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td]53[/td][td]920[/td][td]17.4[/td][td]82T[/td][td]12[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2006 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 14 [/td] [td] 11 [/td] [td]45[/td][td]632[/td][td]14.0[/td][td]75T[/td][td]3[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][/table]
Sidney Rice Rec. Yards TD's
[table][tr][td]2009 [/td][td] Minnesota Vikings [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 14 [/td] [td]83[/td][td]1,312[/td][td]15.8[/td][td]63[/td][td]8[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2008 [/td][td] Minnesota Vikings [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td] 3 [/td] [td]15[/td][td]141[/td][td]9.4[/td][td]23T[/td][td]4[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2007 [/td][td] Minnesota Vikings [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]31[/td][td]396[/td][td]12.8[/td][td]60T[/td][td]4[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][/table]
Greg Jennings and Sidney Rices 2008 and 2009 years are almost IDENTICAL, and your only argument is that one year Rice had as to why he is better.
As you can clearly see other then 2009 RIce has done nothing.
Jennings has put up numbers every year.
Im done now
i dont know whats left to argue about this topic, Jennings has already done what Rice has done in Rice's 2009 year, and then had 4 solid years to add to it.
Rice and Jennings is.
Shaincoe had 2 good years. 2008 and 2009.
2008 - Finley already has half the receptions the first 4 games this year, then Shaincoe did all of 2008..
2009 - Finley had one less reception but over a 100 yards more then Shaincoe, and Finley only started 10 games.
You cant even made the career argument for shaincoe cause he had like 6 seasons with 10 receptions or less
..no seriously
[table][tr][td]Season[/td][td]Team[/td][td]
[/td][td]Receiving[/td][td]Rushing[/td][td]Fumbles[/td][/tr][tr][td]G[/td][td]GS[/td][td]Rec[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]Att[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]FUM[/td][td]Lost[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2006 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]12[/td][td]81[/td][td]6.8[/td][td]16[/td][td]0[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2005 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 5 [/td] [td]8[/td][td]91[/td][td]11.4[/td][td]17[/td][td]0[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2004 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 7 [/td] [td]5[/td][td]25[/td][td]5.0[/td][td]9[/td][td]1[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2003 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 7 [/td] [td]10[/td][td]56[/td][td]5.6[/td][td]10[/td][td]2[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][/table]
I see what your saying though about Finley and Shaincoe, i just think Jennings and Rice is a bit more debatable.
I am well aware now that Moss changes alot, but we are talking about Rice and Jennings careers up to this point.
Totally disregarding Finley and Shaincoe though, can any of you Vikings fans at least see where im coming from?
Greg Jennings
[table][tr][td]Season[/td][td]Team[/td][td]
[/td][td]Receiving[/td][td]Rushing[/td][td]Fumbles[/td][/tr][tr][td]G[/td][td]GS[/td][td]Rec[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]Att[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]FUM[/td][td]Lost[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2010 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]12[/td][td]161[/td][td]13.4[/td][td]32T[/td][td]3[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2009 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td]68[/td][td]1,113[/td][td]16.4[/td][td]83T[/td][td]4[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2008 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 15 [/td] [td]80[/td][td]1,292[/td][td]16.2[/td][td]63[/td][td]9[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2007 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td]53[/td][td]920[/td][td]17.4[/td][td]82T[/td][td]12[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2006 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 14 [/td] [td] 11 [/td] [td]45[/td][td]632[/td][td]14.0[/td][td]75T[/td][td]3[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][/table]
Sidney Rice Rec. Yards TD's
[table][tr][td]2009 [/td][td] Minnesota Vikings [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 14 [/td] [td]83[/td][td]1,312[/td][td]15.8[/td][td]63[/td][td]8[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2008 [/td][td] Minnesota Vikings [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td] 3 [/td] [td]15[/td][td]141[/td][td]9.4[/td][td]23T[/td][td]4[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2007 [/td][td] Minnesota Vikings [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]31[/td][td]396[/td][td]12.8[/td][td]60T[/td][td]4[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][/table]
Greg Jennings and Sidney Rices 2008 and 2009 years are almost IDENTICAL, and your only argument is that one year Rice had as to why he is better.
As you can clearly see other then 2009 RIce has done nothing.
Jennings has put up numbers every year.
Im done now
- 4,876
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
Jermichael Finley and Shaincoe aint even debatable
Rice and Jennings is.
Shaincoe had 2 good years. 2008 and 2009.
2008 - Finley already has half the receptions the first 4 games this year, then Shaincoe did all of 2008..
2009 - Finley had one less reception but over a 100 yards more then Shaincoe, and Finley only started 10 games.
You cant even made the career argument for shaincoe cause he had like 6 seasons with 10 receptions or less
..no seriously
[table][tr][td]Season[/td][td]Team[/td][td]
[/td][td]Receiving[/td][td]Rushing[/td][td]Fumbles[/td][/tr][tr][td]G[/td][td]GS[/td][td]Rec[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]Att[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]FUM[/td][td]Lost[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2006 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]12[/td][td]81[/td][td]6.8[/td][td]16[/td][td]0[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2005 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 5 [/td] [td]8[/td][td]91[/td][td]11.4[/td][td]17[/td][td]0[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2004 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 7 [/td] [td]5[/td][td]25[/td][td]5.0[/td][td]9[/td][td]1[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2003 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 7 [/td] [td]10[/td][td]56[/td][td]5.6[/td][td]10[/td][td]2[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][/table]
I see what your saying though about Finley and Shaincoe, i just think Jennings and Rice is a bit more debatable.
I am well aware now that Moss changes alot, but we are talking about Rice and Jennings careers up to this point.
Totally disregarding Finley and Shaincoe though, can any of you Vikings fans at least see where im coming from?
Greg Jennings
[table][tr][td]Season[/td][td]Team[/td][td]
[/td][td]Receiving[/td][td]Rushing[/td][td]Fumbles[/td][/tr][tr][td]G[/td][td]GS[/td][td]Rec[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]Att[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]FUM[/td][td]Lost[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2010 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]12[/td][td]161[/td][td]13.4[/td][td]32T[/td][td]3[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2009 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td]68[/td][td]1,113[/td][td]16.4[/td][td]83T[/td][td]4[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2008 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 15 [/td] [td]80[/td][td]1,292[/td][td]16.2[/td][td]63[/td][td]9[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2007 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td]53[/td][td]920[/td][td]17.4[/td][td]82T[/td][td]12[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2006 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 14 [/td] [td] 11 [/td] [td]45[/td][td]632[/td][td]14.0[/td][td]75T[/td][td]3[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][/table]
Sidney Rice Rec. Yards TD's
[table][tr][td]2009 [/td][td] Minnesota Vikings [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 14 [/td] [td]83[/td][td]1,312[/td][td]15.8[/td][td]63[/td][td]8[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2008 [/td][td] Minnesota Vikings [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td] 3 [/td] [td]15[/td][td]141[/td][td]9.4[/td][td]23T[/td][td]4[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2007 [/td][td] Minnesota Vikings [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]31[/td][td]396[/td][td]12.8[/td][td]60T[/td][td]4[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][/table]
Greg Jennings and Sidney Rices 2008 and 2009 years are almost IDENTICAL, and your only argument is that one year Rice had as to why he is better.
As you can clearly see other then 2009 RIce has done nothing.
Jennings has put up numbers every year.
Im done now
i dont know whats left to argue about this topic, Jennings has already done what Rice has done in Rice's 2009 year, and then had 4 solid years to add to it.
Rice and Jennings is.
Shaincoe had 2 good years. 2008 and 2009.
2008 - Finley already has half the receptions the first 4 games this year, then Shaincoe did all of 2008..
2009 - Finley had one less reception but over a 100 yards more then Shaincoe, and Finley only started 10 games.
You cant even made the career argument for shaincoe cause he had like 6 seasons with 10 receptions or less
..no seriously
[table][tr][td]Season[/td][td]Team[/td][td]
[/td][td]Receiving[/td][td]Rushing[/td][td]Fumbles[/td][/tr][tr][td]G[/td][td]GS[/td][td]Rec[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]Att[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]FUM[/td][td]Lost[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2006 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]12[/td][td]81[/td][td]6.8[/td][td]16[/td][td]0[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2005 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 5 [/td] [td]8[/td][td]91[/td][td]11.4[/td][td]17[/td][td]0[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2004 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 7 [/td] [td]5[/td][td]25[/td][td]5.0[/td][td]9[/td][td]1[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2003 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 7 [/td] [td]10[/td][td]56[/td][td]5.6[/td][td]10[/td][td]2[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][/table]
I see what your saying though about Finley and Shaincoe, i just think Jennings and Rice is a bit more debatable.
I am well aware now that Moss changes alot, but we are talking about Rice and Jennings careers up to this point.
Totally disregarding Finley and Shaincoe though, can any of you Vikings fans at least see where im coming from?
Greg Jennings
[table][tr][td]Season[/td][td]Team[/td][td]
[/td][td]Receiving[/td][td]Rushing[/td][td]Fumbles[/td][/tr][tr][td]G[/td][td]GS[/td][td]Rec[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]Att[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]FUM[/td][td]Lost[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2010 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]12[/td][td]161[/td][td]13.4[/td][td]32T[/td][td]3[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2009 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td]68[/td][td]1,113[/td][td]16.4[/td][td]83T[/td][td]4[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2008 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 15 [/td] [td]80[/td][td]1,292[/td][td]16.2[/td][td]63[/td][td]9[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2007 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td]53[/td][td]920[/td][td]17.4[/td][td]82T[/td][td]12[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2006 [/td][td] Green Bay Packers [/td] [td] 14 [/td] [td] 11 [/td] [td]45[/td][td]632[/td][td]14.0[/td][td]75T[/td][td]3[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]0[/td][/tr][/table]
Sidney Rice Rec. Yards TD's
[table][tr][td]2009 [/td][td] Minnesota Vikings [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 14 [/td] [td]83[/td][td]1,312[/td][td]15.8[/td][td]63[/td][td]8[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2008 [/td][td] Minnesota Vikings [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td] 3 [/td] [td]15[/td][td]141[/td][td]9.4[/td][td]23T[/td][td]4[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2007 [/td][td] Minnesota Vikings [/td] [td] 13 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]31[/td][td]396[/td][td]12.8[/td][td]60T[/td][td]4[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][/table]
Greg Jennings and Sidney Rices 2008 and 2009 years are almost IDENTICAL, and your only argument is that one year Rice had as to why he is better.
As you can clearly see other then 2009 RIce has done nothing.
Jennings has put up numbers every year.
Im done now