2012 Lexus LFA vs. 2012 Nissan GT-R Vol. 1320

GT-R was a given, but that LFA is a thing of beauty when driven. 
pimp.gif
 
Originally Posted by KayCurrency

I'd rather have a LFA...for stunting purposes...
This man knows what he is talking about. yes the GTR is faster...but then again the GTR is as fast or faster than a 911 Turbo. It's not just about speed. Neither the LFA or the GT-R is slow. But driving around in a car that's worth $400k >>> All. Also the LFA will still get to 200MPH top speed. Not exactly slow.

It's all about exclusivity.
 
Originally Posted by KayCurrency

I'd rather have a LFA...for stunting purposes...
This man knows what he is talking about. yes the GTR is faster...but then again the GTR is as fast or faster than a 911 Turbo. It's not just about speed. Neither the LFA or the GT-R is slow. But driving around in a car that's worth $400k >>> All. Also the LFA will still get to 200MPH top speed. Not exactly slow.

It's all about exclusivity.
 
Originally Posted by ElderWatsonDiggs

Originally Posted by KayCurrency

I'd rather have a LFA...for stunting purposes...
This man knows what he is talking about. yes the GTR is faster...but then again the GTR is as fast or faster than a 911 Turbo. It's not just about speed. Neither the LFA or the GT-R is slow. But driving around in a car that's worth $400k >>> All. Also the LFA will still get to 200MPH top speed. Not exactly slow.

It's all about exclusivity.
911 Turbo>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>GT-R

yes SRS, looks and performance wise
 
Originally Posted by ElderWatsonDiggs

Originally Posted by KayCurrency

I'd rather have a LFA...for stunting purposes...
This man knows what he is talking about. yes the GTR is faster...but then again the GTR is as fast or faster than a 911 Turbo. It's not just about speed. Neither the LFA or the GT-R is slow. But driving around in a car that's worth $400k >>> All. Also the LFA will still get to 200MPH top speed. Not exactly slow.

It's all about exclusivity.
911 Turbo>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>GT-R

yes SRS, looks and performance wise
 
Originally Posted by ElderWatsonDiggs

Originally Posted by KayCurrency

I'd rather have a LFA...for stunting purposes...
This man knows what he is talking about. yes the GTR is faster...but then again the GTR is as fast or faster than a 911 Turbo. It's not just about speed. Neither the LFA or the GT-R is slow. But driving around in a car that's worth $400k >>> All. Also the LFA will still get to 200MPH top speed. Not exactly slow.

It's all about exclusivity.

exclusivity is overated when your car is supposed to be a HALO getting beat by something thats PENNIES to da dollar cheaper factory VS factory

i can think of ALOT smarter ways to spend da rest of that change.

Lexus sure put da L in LFA
 
Originally Posted by ElderWatsonDiggs

Originally Posted by KayCurrency

I'd rather have a LFA...for stunting purposes...
This man knows what he is talking about. yes the GTR is faster...but then again the GTR is as fast or faster than a 911 Turbo. It's not just about speed. Neither the LFA or the GT-R is slow. But driving around in a car that's worth $400k >>> All. Also the LFA will still get to 200MPH top speed. Not exactly slow.

It's all about exclusivity.

exclusivity is overated when your car is supposed to be a HALO getting beat by something thats PENNIES to da dollar cheaper factory VS factory

i can think of ALOT smarter ways to spend da rest of that change.

Lexus sure put da L in LFA
 
Originally Posted by Zyzz

Originally Posted by ElderWatsonDiggs

Originally Posted by KayCurrency

I'd rather have a LFA...for stunting purposes...
This man knows what he is talking about. yes the GTR is faster...but then again the GTR is as fast or faster than a 911 Turbo. It's not just about speed. Neither the LFA or the GT-R is slow. But driving around in a car that's worth $400k >>> All. Also the LFA will still get to 200MPH top speed. Not exactly slow.

It's all about exclusivity.
911 Turbo>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>GT-R

yes SRS, looks and performance wise
I think that's the point he was trying to make....
 
Originally Posted by Zyzz

Originally Posted by ElderWatsonDiggs

Originally Posted by KayCurrency

I'd rather have a LFA...for stunting purposes...
This man knows what he is talking about. yes the GTR is faster...but then again the GTR is as fast or faster than a 911 Turbo. It's not just about speed. Neither the LFA or the GT-R is slow. But driving around in a car that's worth $400k >>> All. Also the LFA will still get to 200MPH top speed. Not exactly slow.

It's all about exclusivity.
911 Turbo>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>GT-R

yes SRS, looks and performance wise
I think that's the point he was trying to make....
 
I would never, ever spend $400k on a Lexus. That's Lambo money, hell I could buy 2 lambos with that cash.

I'd buy a GTR and save the remaining $310,000.
 
I would never, ever spend $400k on a Lexus. That's Lambo money, hell I could buy 2 lambos with that cash.

I'd buy a GTR and save the remaining $310,000.
 
Originally Posted by scshift

I would never, ever spend $400k on a Lexus. That's Lambo money, hell I could buy 2 lambos with that cash.

and this is what people aren't understanding....
 
Originally Posted by scshift

I would never, ever spend $400k on a Lexus. That's Lambo money, hell I could buy 2 lambos with that cash.

and this is what people aren't understanding....
 
Back
Top Bottom