darthska
Staff member
- 46,500
- 30,794
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
Well then it's a tendency that I don't like.
And never, EVER will.
And never, EVER will.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
whats the point in saying if kobe played like rondo or *insert pass first pg name here* he may or may not have been as successful?Because of OTHER things Kobe brings to the table, if he WAS a Rondo type (limited shooting range, EXCELLENT passing ability), I fully believe he'd still have multiple championships by now. Maybe not 5. Maybe more than 5. But because of his tenacity, dedication to his craft, and competitiveness, he'd be a champion by now if he had a different skill set, no doubt.
See, then it goes to something else.Exactly what I was about to say. KD is a volume shooter, he's just more efficient at it. You're not going to be a scoring champion without shooting a lot of shots. Westbrook is a volume shooter as well, he's less efficient. Bron was a volume shooter in his first stint in CLE, he wasn't nearly as efficient as he was the last couple seasons in Miami, and his shots have creeped up back to that 19-20 per game range and he's not been nearly as efficient so far. Is he still playing basketball the right way?
That's the thing, there are certain things about Kobe that I respect. You know it, I know it, and everyone who has paid attention knows it. In the NBA thread, I've been accused twice already this season of being a Kobe stan.
Can't say the same about players I truly find no value in; JR Smith, Eddie House, OJ Mayo. There is nothing about what they bring to a basketball court that I respect.
Kobe? I respect certain things he brings to the table.
39 points on 37 shots is not one of those things. Never has been, never, EVER will be. If someone brings up some of my favorite players (KD, Bron, Kidd, Eyebrows) on a day when they shoot like 30ish shots and net like 25-40 points, I'm'a clown that player, too... then remind whoever brought that game up that Kobe's entire career has seen those types of games, frequently. And I still don't like it. Just because KD has a game where he chucks 34 and nets 40, I'm not gonna go "Oh, well, then I love Kobe now."
And dudes like seaman stay trying to sway an opinion instead of just casually discussing differences by validating points or offering rebuttals.
Because of OTHER things Kobe brings to the table, if he WAS a Rondo type (limited shooting range, EXCELLENT passing ability), I fully believe he'd still have multiple championships by now. Maybe not 5. Maybe more than 5. But because of his tenacity, dedication to his craft, and competitiveness, he'd be a champion by now if he had a different skill set, no doubt.
But the skill set he DOES have includes volume shooting, something I hate.
for some reason this post makes me want to get pasta for lunchthis Italian on Italian violence needs to stop
this Italian on Italian violence needs to stop
whats the point in saying if kobe played like rondo or *insert pass first pg name here* he may or may not have been as successful?Because of OTHER things Kobe brings to the table, if he WAS a Rondo type (limited shooting range, EXCELLENT passing ability), I fully believe he'd still have multiple championships by now. Maybe not 5. Maybe more than 5. But because of his tenacity, dedication to his craft, and competitiveness, he'd be a champion by now if he had a different skill set, no doubt.
im sure someone who works as hard as kobe and is as athletic/talented would find a way to be successful in a wide variety of playstyles/skillsets
are you not crediting his OTHER traits (hardwork, skill, ect..) for his success rather than his playstyle?
if that is the case (It's not the case, though. I did credit his other traits as contributors to his success. Rather plainly.) then surely there have been a few players that do play like rondo that are just as skilled and work just as hard, why are they not nearly as successful as a guy like kobe or even wade?
i understand you're not going to change your opinion or like the way kobe plays basketball, but you imply that you would rather see him play like rondo (I implied no such thing. Mentioning someone else as an example to what I'm saying does NOT mean or imply that hye should play like that guy). all im asking is some evidence that this rondo playstyle is anywhere near as effective as what kobe has done (well, Rondo's playstyle hasn't included having a top 1 coach of all time and a top 2/3 center of all time, depending on opinion, so there's that.)
if you cant do that then that nice paragraph you just wrote is meaningless
the context of that is, if you think dantoni is trash then thibs is also trash. so in other words i put them on about the same levelSeaMan is a cool dude, but the fact that he said Thibbs is a "trash basketball coach" taught me that he is not one to get into a mature, logical basketball debate with.
I don't expect everyone to feel the same about every basketball topic, but that opinion just killed my whole perception of talking basketball with him.
Overrated?
Deficient with offense?
Bad with drawing up plays?
Okay... I might listen even if I don't agree.
But just saying he's "trash?"
Meh.
One less person I know to debate with
No offense, Sea. You're still a funny guy
Ay dios mio.You are switching up the argument though. Do you dislike Kobe for having the tendency of being a volume shooter? Or being a "glory hog" and "bad teammate" although countless players have said he's been a great teammate and good influence on them.
I'm an honorary Splash Brother though.
who did you steal this one from?
who did you steal this one from?
Ay dios mio.
It's simple.
Have you never, EVER disliked something that you also had small appreciation for? Maybe a car that you absolutely hated, bu the sound system was on point?
Have you NEVER liked something that had a few things that drove you crazy? Maybe this perfect chick, that was close to perfect except for the fact that she had this uber-annoying BFF.