- 72,799
- 116,891
And was originally gonna be IT as the 1. Kyrie trade happened a month after Hayward signed.What? Nah. Tatum was a rookie and Jaylen was still dribbling off his feet. It was supposed to be Kyrie and Hayward as 1 and 2.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And was originally gonna be IT as the 1. Kyrie trade happened a month after Hayward signed.What? Nah. Tatum was a rookie and Jaylen was still dribbling off his feet. It was supposed to be Kyrie and Hayward as 1 and 2.
Somehow a 26 year old all-star wing in the west coming off scoring 24 a game in the playoffs, who every team with cap space wanted that summer, wasn’t worth it. That revisionist history
Alright well acting like it was a foregone conclusion that boston would get something in return for hayward is revisionist. And I remember thinking hayward was never worth that money in real time, maybe it was just meUtah (super max), Miami, Charlotte, and Boston all offered him a max contract. Hayward chose Boston. Ainge paid market value for an all-star wing entering his prime.
Where did I say I didn’t want Turner? I said he’d be good in Boston’s system. I also didn’t know that they could basically get his same production in Tristan Thompson for half the money with the non-taxpayer MLE opening up.
Alright well acting like it was a foregone conclusion that boston would get something in return for hayward is revisionist. And I remember thinking hayward was never worth that money in real time, maybe it was just me
It was people saying at that time Gordon wasn't worth it. I was a reverse racist for saying it.
Ainge just overplayed his hand. They drafted well with Tatum and Brown but all that pump faking with those "great assets". Signing Gordon did little for their franchise. Fumbling tryna get AD, Kyrie ain't wanna be there. A lot of false hope was being sold.
Signing Gordon did little for their franchise.
Always been funny style
He had a freak injury in the first Damn game of the season...in the first quarter...that put him out for a season and set him back . He was most definitely worth that. That was the market price. You just don’t like him lol.
Hayward was LIKE that then. It’s funny, because the Paul George **** is even more true. I have not seen Paul George advance any deeper in the western conference...Despite playing with an All Star, mvp guard, and finals mvp...he just blew a 3-1 lead to “Dirk Gasol” and “Canadian Clarkson” And putting up a 5 POINTS trash game...against a Utah Team WITHOUT Hayward and getting bounced was poetic justice that you forgot.
I just did a search and there was definitely a debate on whether or not Hayward was a top 20 player after he signed a max with Boston. Otto and them are bad examples because those were all clearly terrible deals off top regardless of the marketYou can’t argue against his production, age, efficiency, health and impact on winning at that time.
This is a time where Evan Turner, Wes Matthews (off an ACL injury), Otto Porter & Chandler Parsons (also off an injury) were getting paid like 18-20 ms a year. Not to mention the likes of older players like Paul Milsap, Mike Conley, Al Horford and even Jrue getting $30m’s a year.
Like cmon bruh .
Ain't got nothing to do with whether I like him. It's athletes that I'm not a fan of but I'll say they're worth the money IF they're worth it.
We know PG is trash in the playoffs. That was entertaining watching the Clippers choke after all that talking but your mans Gordon is fresh off 40/29% and a whole 10 points a game in the playoffs too.
We know PG is trash in the playoffs. That was entertaining watching the Clippers choke after all that talking but your mans Gordon is fresh off 40/29% and a whole 10 points a game in the playoffs too.
I just did a search and there was definitely a debate on whether or not Hayward was a top 20 player after he signed a max with Boston. Otto and them are bad examples because those were all clearly terrible deals off top regardless of the market
It was people saying at that time Gordon wasn't worth it. I was a reverse racist for saying it.
Ainge just overplayed his hand. They drafted well with Tatum and Brown but all that pump faking with those "great assets". Signing Gordon did little for their franchise. Fumbling tryna get AD, Kyrie ain't wanna be there. A lot of false hope was being sold.
I'm all for not spending big money on B+ players, but there's like maybe a half dozen guys in the league that really matter. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯Gotta realize this is a board where some people think winning is overrated in basketball , so if your content with being a borderline conference finals team you max a guy like Hayward. The NBA has caused this situation where there's "Max" guys who are good but not elite & it's usually how teams get stuck in purgatory.
If your goal is to win a championship signing one of these B+ Stars to big money is usually an issue
And all them dudes were bad deals bro . Especially otto of all people, everybody knew that one was stupid. It's not revisionist and Hayward's market was still over valued this year. The market just reflects the going rate, not the actual value. Jrue holiday wasn't worth what he just got traded for, etcThat’s the market this the fact that it was “debatable” proves the point. He was in range. And when you’re negotiating...you point to the market. And those cats I listed, would be brought up.