Well let me put things in perspective. Even with both the Grizzlies and Warriors putting up awful numbers from beyond the arc, the points from both teams were both higher than the average NBA scores per team pre-2000s. So that goes to show you that even with putting up atrocious 3-point percentage numbers, it's still more effective than what they put out prior to the 3-point era.
Can always traffick in another wife. Only one Luka tho
you mad again?
well in perspective, you are trying to win a game unless your concern is to outshoot your opponent from 3 just because analytics say that your average is higher from that area. I have seen some ridiculous plays that players blow a wide open lay-up and retreated to do a 3 and missing.
with all my heart and my sane mind. also, Bob Cousy says HI !
THAT YOU BETTA RESPECT. Our President honored him and so should you. He could cross up a fool if he wanted to but he's a Conservative. We aren't flashy but you must not mistake us for fools or LIBS.
No doubt, if you can get passed your man to get a lay-up, you go for it. But I would say most of the 3s were of the catching and shooting variety, so their goal was to let the shot off from where they stood without a thought about finding a lane to drive in. If you're a perimeter shooter and you have a little bit space to get a clean shot, you shoot it. You primary task is to shoot, so you're not lingering on whether or not to drive. You drive if you could clear a guy closing in on you, but even with that, the defense could collapse on you. This is why teams rather keep passing until they either hit some one cutting inside or for a high-percentage shot, or they find a player with a wide-open shot beyond the arc.
HBD mane
Vincent Van Goat
Talk to em Bob!!!
Mens college hoops too
LIBS WON'T SLOW YOU DOWN THIS WEEKEND LFG.
