- 3,180
- 13
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2002
I can see why people would liken it to the XV in a way... it's arguably the least popular of the numbered Jordans. That said, They were going for somethingdifferent at the time, and
to some extent, i feel like the shoe has maybe just a tiny bit of merit to it.
The 2010 however....
IIRC, Tinker had some input into these, but most of the work was done by Mayden(?) I haven't liked every Jordan Tinker's done, but there's usuallybeen some sort of structure to the design.
To me, these are just a bunch or random angles in a generic shoe, with a random midsole design and a see through window because it looks 'cool'.
Maybe Tinker had more input into these than i realised, and maybe i'm seeing things that aren't there, but in the vid it seems to me like he'sfairly disinterested in the shoe, and that he's struggling to come up with a sales pitch for it.
This could've been a turnaround model for the Jordan Line. It doesn't matter if it's the best performing Jordan yet, it just looks cluttered. The2009 was no looker either, but at least there was a sort of 'cleaness' to it.
Oh, and something about the toebox material looks really cheap to me... maybe im just looking for excuses there though.
to some extent, i feel like the shoe has maybe just a tiny bit of merit to it.
The 2010 however....
Originally Posted by kidslikekix
Of all the AJ shoes that Tinker designed (3-15, 20, 23, 2010) there are only 3 that I didn't feel; the AJ X, because in my opinion there was nothing special about the shoe. No real tech-detail that stood out. All it was was a shoe with his stats on the sole, and it colorblocked well. the AJ XV, looked great in pics, but in person, to me, it didn't feel like a quality product. It just felt cheap, in my opinion. And not there are these AJ 2010.
The problem for me is when designers attempt to build stories into shoes. Stories that are pointless. I don't know if anyone checked out the part in the Video when they said that the "Carolina Blue" in the sockliner is supposed to represent MJ's love for North Carolina. The fact is, that foam that is used, naturally comes in that color.
IIRC, Tinker had some input into these, but most of the work was done by Mayden(?) I haven't liked every Jordan Tinker's done, but there's usuallybeen some sort of structure to the design.
To me, these are just a bunch or random angles in a generic shoe, with a random midsole design and a see through window because it looks 'cool'.
Maybe Tinker had more input into these than i realised, and maybe i'm seeing things that aren't there, but in the vid it seems to me like he'sfairly disinterested in the shoe, and that he's struggling to come up with a sales pitch for it.
This could've been a turnaround model for the Jordan Line. It doesn't matter if it's the best performing Jordan yet, it just looks cluttered. The2009 was no looker either, but at least there was a sort of 'cleaness' to it.
Oh, and something about the toebox material looks really cheap to me... maybe im just looking for excuses there though.