KanyIZZY
formerly j o 19
- Oct 1, 2004
- 18,737
- 49,943
Shape can be 100% but if they have 2011 suede its 
Air Jordan 5 OG “Black Metallic” Reimagined 2025 !
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Jordanbball,
- Start date
AIR J XIII
Supporter
- Nov 11, 2002
- 6,839
- 13,867
- May 7, 2016
- 17,375
- 52,472
Man… the new images on zsneakersheadz on these are looking good! Need em bad!
What happened was that a bunch of reps were being posted and some of those reps legit had 3m on them along with terrible toe boxes. Now people are seeing real pairs and they have a better toebox without the 3m. I've been on NT for almost 6 years and cats are still taking early looks at face value. 9/10 they're fakes.
- Dec 7, 2015
- 2,229
- 7,276
At this point it's a NT prerelease tradition to look at fakes, bash them and sat you're sitting out, only to see retail pairs and say you're in for a pair.
- Sep 6, 2000
- 10,926
- 18,734
Nah, it wasn't just that. The info that "leaked" said they had 3M piping. This wasn't just people on NT believing the first looks were legit.
- Aug 17, 2023
- 614
- 1,294
Damn the recent zsneaker post lookin 
legit pairs looking way better
legit pairs looking way betterOh yeah... Zsneaks posts fakes all the time and isn't credible. Remember when he posted the soon-to-be reimagined 4s with a nubuck upper and then tried to claim that his "source" said that JB decided to go with leather instead just a month ahead of the release? There are very few credible sources out there in regards to these releases. The most credible sources I've come across are two posters on here, one of which, let me know the Columbias were coming a year ago. As a collective, we gotta stop being gullible.
- Apr 30, 2011
- 8,404
- 11,429
Material doesn’t look the same though. The 2011’s showed so much smudging and I haven’t seen that on these. I’d rather get a deep black like this than ashy larry nubuck that looks awfulShape can be 100% but if they have 2011 suede its
rbk93
Supporter
- Jun 29, 2016
- 14,385
- 13,759
Are there early pairs out there for sale yet?
- Dec 17, 2018
- 5,376
- 9,883
Goat has some but they are ridiculously priced
- Sep 6, 2000
- 10,926
- 18,734
I don't trust Z any further than I can kick him as far as mockups go. I'm just saying nobody based that 3M piping info off the early pics. Has nothing to do with being gullible. Seemed plausible to pretty much everyone in here given the "Reimagined" designation. So with that info and what Nike has done in the past with adding 3M to other 5's, it didn't seem like much of a leap.
- Sep 4, 2006
- 48,737
- 29,100
Which pairs are those?
Want me to send pics?
- Aug 18, 2000
- 4,945
- 13,055
First thing I'm doing is swapping out the white laces for black.
- Jan 2, 2023
- 1,362
- 4,031
I really REALLY want these. I’m praying they don’t use that ashy suede. And yes, black laces all the way!
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,547
- 33,351
They look good. A lot better than some of these pics are looking.
- Jul 22, 2012
- 139
- 536
- Jul 1, 2008
- 14,992
- 20,460
The material really killed these man. Shape and toe box are way better than the first set of pics, but the material 
- Jun 22, 2018
- 5,323
- 6,575
I'm still in
AIR J XIII
Supporter
- Nov 11, 2002
- 6,839
- 13,867
If they are ashy, I only need to to replace my 2016s which are struggling. Willing to double up if they are not ashy.
- Dec 1, 2012
- 1,821
- 1,986
back to that 2011 ash?
- Aug 2, 2014
- 78
- 125
They can do even better on the shape. Not buying any 5s until closer to OG.
