- Joined Apr 28, 2013
Need on discount
I’ve still got the 2000 retro in vnds condition other than how I ****ed them up when I tried to unyellow the soles with sea glow like 15 years ago so yeah sole separation from what I know now was too long in heat from the sun. Eventually I would love to do a sole swap.Broke these out today. Materials look cheap. I had the '00 retro. Looks and feels nothing like it. But, it's what I come to expect. I can appreciate having a wearable pair though.
Word? Say/share more. Seems random there'd be a 95 sample of these.
Idk if going on clearance really means a whole lot. Especially back then. Really boils down to how much money they made. I agree though, that statement also caught my eye.It's interesting that the article states the 1, 2, 3 first retros in '94 were successful. It's my understanding that they were relative flops hitting deep discounts on clearance racks.
They'll get you don't worry.Has anyone had a free pair of kicks from FTL/FNL/FA? I ordered two of these, and it's one per customer, but they charged my card for 424. They canceled one a few days later and refunded the 212, and then I got shipping confirmation for the first pair. I wake up and they took the charge off of my card, refunded me the other 212, and the shoes are enroute. Has this happend to anyone else?? Right now it looks like I'll have a free pair if nothing changes.
I sometimes wear mine. Sometimes I wear just the red piece without the clear. Agree it’s annoying but it is part of the look imo.So what's the concensus on wearing the lace locks?
I wore my the first 2 times I wore them. That 3rd time they went into the box. Too annoying to have to tighten/loosen.
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker or head over to our upgrade page to donate for an ad-free experience Upgrade now