- 763
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
Well, we're halfway there...Originally Posted by Weatherman
What's next guys.. is someone gonna claim Nike actually owns Air Randy and SDS and is responsible for all of this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Well, we're halfway there...Originally Posted by Weatherman
What's next guys.. is someone gonna claim Nike actually owns Air Randy and SDS and is responsible for all of this?
Oh myOriginally Posted by jecca650
Heres a comparison of the shoes both sellers are sending to their customers. Obviously there's a difference in the toe caps.
Air randy's 11s
Jay's 11s
Originally Posted by GottaBdaShoes
You guys have no idea.. and no I won't tell you what that means.
Originally Posted by rayray3thousand
Originally Posted by zyr12
Lee is a good friend of mine, and he know way more than I do, that's for sure.Originally Posted by eddo1005
What i dont get is, if you guys are playing the part of whistleblowers, why havent you guys come out with all the info? Bad for business?
I would think if you wanted to be whistleblowers, you would go all the way with it.
At this point, you and nooblee have only pointed out subtle difference between what you have on your site 23penny.com and whats on SDS/AR sites. Yet we have no way of knowing for sure whether your product is the real deal or theirs. Only real advantage you have is that you speak English well, so everyone on NT and the rest of the english speaking world would much rather believe that guy who speaks english, than the guy who speak chinglish.
I haven't got my Concords in yet, will be another 2 weeks or so, things don't so good on the fore front right now
As far as whistle blowing, I'm good, I've been dropping hints in here for a while, even back to the point when Air-Randy HK had blue shoe trees. I run a business, how bad would it look if I keep bashing SlamDunk and Air-Randy, just think of me like Marquee Sole.
I got 26 pairs of Rays, all real, a lot of people can vouch for me, but we are not talking about that, damn, you are making me sounding more like zyzz
www.23penny.com
I will post 100 pics if you need me to prove to you the authenticity, but there's parts of the business I can't give out, it is what pays my bills after all
"you know you done #$%#$% up right? you know that right?"
Originally Posted by zyr12
You serious?Originally Posted by rayray3thousand
Originally Posted by zyr12
I will post 100 pics if you need me to prove to you the authenticity, but there's parts of the business I can't give out, it is what pays my bills after all
"you know you done #$%#$% up right? you know that right?"
You want me to spill you the beans on everything?
I mean, the truth isn't that hard to figure out, and you probably will NOT believe it anyways.
I don't deal with fake and all this other BS, I sleep well at night knowing that, plenty of NTers know that too.
I'm done with this thread too.
Originally Posted by optimusp517
Someone should order a pair from each seller haha. If I had money I probably would do that
x2. let it all out people.Originally Posted by lugzzy
i think at this point everybody who has any insider info has to come clean and tell us what we really want to know about these early releases..
When did you buy the shoe? Early 2010?Originally Posted by knuckles2k5
i know this has nothing to do with the aj xi concord
i bought a pair of authentic nike air max 2009 (running shoe) blk/red from footlocker in 2010, shoe released in march of 2009
inside the tag date saids it was made on 2010, dont remember the exact date but i will take pics later on, just hate going through all those shoe boxes lol
i got them this past december of 2010, i saw a pair in the store (sz 8.5) ask one of the workers if they had a sz 10, he said no but he search in the system for a sz 10 in another store and had them ship to my houseOriginally Posted by zyr12
When did you buy the shoe? Early 2010?Originally Posted by knuckles2k5
i know this has nothing to do with the aj xi concord
i bought a pair of authentic nike air max 2009 (running shoe) blk/red from footlocker in 2010, shoe released in march of 2009
inside the tag date saids it was made on 2010, dont remember the exact date but i will take pics later on, just hate going through all those shoe boxes lol
Nike's biggest cash cow right now is Nike Running, it's only fitting that they keep making them to keep up with the demand. I wouldn't be surprised if Nike still makes 2011s in Feb. 2012.
Like I said before, its a cut throat business....maybe other sites are claiming that someone is selling "fakes" because they didn't have the funds to buy the shoes at the time. Maybe all these people that are making all these accusations are working for, or promoting a website that didn't get their pairs. Maybe AR and SDS paid more for the shoes from their source then they usually do, for more pairs because they knew people would buy them like hot cakes and there was money to be made.Originally Posted by ALittleBitCooler
x2. let it all out people.Originally Posted by lugzzy
i think at this point everybody who has any insider info has to come clean and tell us what we really want to know about these early releases..
Originally Posted by Freeze
haven't got my tracking yet, i'm order #459
Originally Posted by knuckles2k5
i know this has nothing to do with the aj xi concord
i bought a pair of authentic nike air max 2009 (running shoe) blk/red from footlocker in 2010, shoe released in march of 2009
inside the tag date saids it was made on 2010, dont remember the exact date but i will take pics later on, just hate going through all those shoe boxes lol
Originally Posted by jay zoe2
It's a natural progression. First the issue was straight up fake shoes, that it moved to slightly passable fake. Afte that is was B-Grades being passed off, now we've gotten to the point were they are actually being allowed/are able to to get authentic unapproved pairs. The are pretty much the same stuff that Footlocker/Champs/Eastbay will be getting, They just aren't on Nike/JB inventory manifest and they aren't being quality checked or stamped.
Question: If non-federal entities find a way where they can get ten minutes a day at the federal print were they have access to all $100 print press and all the legit sheets, inks, and water markings that the government uses; is the money that they print during that ten minute time frame not as real as the bills that were printed twenty minutes prior by Federal Mint Employees - in the same location using the same equipement and supplies?