- 10,321
- 8,214
i got my 05s and they are nice, i think i ll get a pair of 3m less retros as an everyday shoe..
Air Jordan XIII - Flint colorway to drop November 2010 (via Kicksonfire.com)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by blaz3n,
- Start date
- 110
- 13
are these a gr ?
- 110
- 13
are these a gr ?
ELTORO84
formerly air23xxi
- 1,773
- 687
MY 05 pair still looks good. I will be copping these with or without 3M.
- 5,015
- 1,020
- 364
- 10
It doesn't crease because the leather is fake, lol.
- 9,453
- 10
yes
- 1,518
- 10
so im still debatin this question. whata do yall thnk? do yall thnk this is one of them GR's that sell out qwik? i mean it is black friday they drop. should i go lose sleep or do yall think i can get off work @ 5 n go cop deez n they still have my size?
- 238
- 10
lmao
- 289
- 10
those are nice looking pics on feet.
- 289
- 10
those look nice on feet.Originally Posted by never wear them
will try to get me a 2010 pair... these have been on my feet for the past 2 weeks...
- 12,885
- 2,739
Don't fall for it. Never Wear Them can make Kobe 2's look good on feet.
- 2,153
- 948
i dont think these will sell out the first day
- 12,290
- 6,780
I wanna buy the 2010s just for ball to be honest.
I'm going back to the essence on this one.
I'm going back to the essence on this one.
- 1,582
- 10
L0L THATS BECAUSE THEYRE 2005 FLINTSOriginally Posted by h0opman31
those look nice on feet.Originally Posted by never wear them
will try to get me a 2010 pair... these have been on my feet for the past 2 weeks...
- 1,518
- 10
Originally Posted by h0opman31
those look nice on feet.Originally Posted by never wear them
will try to get me a 2010 pair... these have been on my feet for the past 2 weeks...
lol
- 93
- 10
again?...lol
- 4,180
- 2,778
Heres a comparison, try and get some better pics, but the worst thing about the 2004 versions was that ugly brown glue that leaked from the midsoles I saw it happen on so many pairs.
http://defynewyork.wordpr...nt-1998-vs-2004-vs-2010/
http://defynewyork.wordpr...nt-1998-vs-2004-vs-2010/
- 1,757
- 10
whats the sizing on these if anybody know the 2010 ones
- 496
- 12
pass.. too much otha heat droppin at the end of year
- 4,719
- 423
I was siked about this flint release until I saw that they weren't going to have 3M. Like cmon JB. Thats what makes the flints and blk/reds so dope is the 3M smh. This release just nose dived imo and with the blk/reds scheduled for nov. too i may have to pass on these
- 7,138
- 6,238
I feel the same way. The 3M made the shoe! Imagine if the retroed the V with no 3M tounge? (99-00)
- 289
- 10
Originally Posted by Antalonboubmpo
L0L THATS BECAUSE THEYRE 2005 FLINTSOriginally Posted by h0opman31
those look nice on feet.Originally Posted by never wear them
will try to get me a 2010 pair... these have been on my feet for the past 2 weeks...
lol
- 364
- 10
^Those 2005's are DOPE AS HELL. They look WAYYYYYYYYYYYY better than the 2010's.
- 15,762
- 517
The 2005's were great, but they definitely had their flaws.
The toe box on a lot of pairs came already creased, the redish/brown glue was clearly visible, and on some, the tongues would be inconsistent in length.
Just saying.
I just think if these had a strong 3M, people could overlook the rest.
