- 20,261
- 2,188
OP are you and your mom California state workers?
If you are you should be blaming your governor for that..
If you are you should be blaming your governor for that..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by DeadsetAce
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
Yea, but the difference is you wanted to support the Republican partyOriginally Posted by Emmanuel Goldstein
i tried to tell yall ... smhOriginally Posted by airmaxpenny1
The more and more we get into dude's tenure the more I realize Barack isn't going to change %@++.
America has two parties, one for the rich (democrats) and one for the religous nuts and crazies (republicans). This country's goverment sucks. I almost wish somehow Palin would have became President because there would have at least been chance of an uprising.
Originally Posted by you big dummy
OP are you and your mom California state workers?
If you are you should be blaming your governor for that..
Originally Posted by Mebo03
we have too many of those jets and they are ineffective in the wars we are currently fighting. John Mccain was in favor of getting rid of the new f-22sOriginally Posted by Emmanuel Goldstein
until those jets are needed when another terrorist attack happens because of the weakened national defense under this administration ...
I guess everybody commenting here against Obama has ignored what has been said at least 2 times in this thread. The F-22s were cut because the F-35 is a more effective weapon and costs less...and oh by the way the Pentatgon agreed with the cut. I would guess you also didn't research the topic enough to know that the plane costs $44,000 per hour to operate and has NEVER been used in Iraq or afghanistan
complete hogwash ... let me know when those funds get spent on the f-35s ...
Originally Posted by chagocal
Originally Posted by kix4kix
Raise your hand if you didn't vote for Obama
*Raises Hand*
Same here.Originally Posted by p0tat0 5alad
I have yet to get a job and I've been looking since summer of 08.
Originally Posted by Mangudai954
Shoot, even doctors and nurses are being laid off.
Originally Posted by Essential1
1. he didn't break his promise and he has been doing well with promises for a politician.
Originally Posted by doyung9
Everyone keeps saying "Barack > McCain" and accepting it almost as if there was no other choice.
Clinton '08 anyone?
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/Originally Posted by Emmanuel Goldstein
stop it ... just stop it ... exits ...
I guess we'll never know, now will we?Originally Posted by kix4kix
Originally Posted by doyung9
Everyone keeps saying "Barack > McCain" and accepting it almost as if there was no other choice.
Clinton '08 anyone?
wut? The party chose Obama. They could have opted to not include Michigan, they knew Barack had a way better chance against McCain. No way Hilary would have beat McCain...So in essence he was the only option.
No way? Really? Obama would have won regardless the count on Michigan but to say Hillary could not have beaten McCain at all is so far from thetruth it is beyond ridiculous.Originally Posted by doyung9
I guess we'll never know, now will we?Originally Posted by kix4kix
Originally Posted by doyung9
Everyone keeps saying "Barack > McCain" and accepting it almost as if there was no other choice.
Clinton '08 anyone?
wut? The party chose Obama. They could have opted to not include Michigan, they knew Barack had a way better chance against McCain. No way Hilary would have beat McCain...So in essence he was the only option.
Originally Posted by Essential1
No way? Really? Obama would have won regardless the count on Michigan but to say Hillary could not have beaten McCain at all is so far from the truth it is beyond ridiculous.Originally Posted by doyung9
I guess we'll never know, now will we?Originally Posted by kix4kix
Originally Posted by doyung9
Everyone keeps saying "Barack > McCain" and accepting it almost as if there was no other choice.
Clinton '08 anyone?
wut? The party chose Obama. They could have opted to not include Michigan, they knew Barack had a way better chance against McCain. No way Hilary would have beat McCain...So in essence he was the only option.
There's no reason to argue this you are right. And yeah her hypocrisy of Iraq would have been damaging to her. It would be closer than McCainvs. Obama but I really do disagree that there is 0% chance of her winning but its all speculation anyways who cares.Originally Posted by kix4kix
Originally Posted by Essential1
No way? Really? Obama would have won regardless the count on Michigan but to say Hillary could not have beaten McCain at all is so far from the truth it is beyond ridiculous.Originally Posted by doyung9
I guess we'll never know, now will we?Originally Posted by kix4kix
Originally Posted by doyung9
Everyone keeps saying "Barack > McCain" and accepting it almost as if there was no other choice.
Clinton '08 anyone?
wut? The party chose Obama. They could have opted to not include Michigan, they knew Barack had a way better chance against McCain. No way Hilary would have beat McCain...So in essence he was the only option.
Lets just say if the party wanted Hilary they could have had her. You can sit here and call it ridiculous till the cows come home, cause we will never know, but there was no way Hilary beats McCain with us In Iraq ....no way.
Originally Posted by jumpman247
Originally Posted by Chi ILL
You can't expect good results this quick .
I'm not expecting quick results, I just want to keep my job.
Originally Posted by chagocal
I guess most people did vote because of his color and not his political stances on our life.