- 192
- 66
Me and my employee did the yellow suits for work! My dude did white face so he can look like Jesse but took it off when he realized he looked like Sammy Sosa. Hahaha.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you winHow could you be talking about ppl in general if you start off saying ppl who like BB and suggest they watch DN? Are ppl who like BB not fans of BB?I was talking about people in general not just bb fansAll you're doing here is ignoring my point. I'm sure anything can make sense if you ignore other opposing views and dissenting opinions.Again, DN/BB are both listed under drama, thriller, and drama on imdb.
If said person is a fan of said genres, it follows that they'll most likely like both shows.
Regardless of DN's extra genres(supernatural/animation).So we agree it's irrelevant. Your assumption doesn't add anything to what you're talking about. Just filler to my reply.I didn't say that it was. It's an assumption.
At no point can you show where I do not know the difference between anime and what a genre. Just because you don't understand what I said and assumed I meant anime is a genre does not make it so. That's your inability to comprehend. At no point did you clear up anything for me since you were the one confused in the first place. I'm talking about the genre which you brought up. Not that it is an anime but since you're ignoring the supernatural genre in DN I can see why you're not making the proper connections to the point I'm making and aren't able to process it.You seem to not know the difference, so I cleared it up for you. You said "some ppl simply don't like some genres. It wouldn't matter if it was good." I was talking about shows( primarily animes), then you misused the word genres. The exchange is down below. You need to pay more attention to the words you type.You haven't seen the anime therefore, you can't say that.
Some ppl simply don't like some genres. It wouldn't matter if it was good. Your examples don't really change the argument. They're outliers at best.
Just watched the anime. Same story save for the added crap and cut scenes. Lo and behold my argument did not change as far as quality goes since you know it was the same story.See this is where it's important that you have seen the anime. You're talking about the manga, which I have not read.
I'm talking about the anime, which you have not seen.
So discussing this "drop in quality" is a waste of our time.
The quality of the anime was great from start to finish.
Once you've watched the anime, then you can construct an argument that says otherwise.I think you're ignoring that just because something continues does not mean the quality of it didn't drop. Unfortunately for you, you're hypothetical does not achieve what you wanted it to.The point of the hypothetical question was to show that the drop in quality had more to do with your opinion rather than there actually being a drop in quality. The psychological warfare contines with near. Right from Near's enterance to Light's death. First N figures about that L #2 has to be Light, then Light kept trying to lure out N through some mind games. As implied by Light when he'd be thinking to himself "What are you doing to do N?"
No it is not. This is just a bull **** assumptions and more of the same what ifs. You have no basis for what you're saying here. The fact is it didn't happen that way. So it's not safe to say AT ALL
None of this changes what I've said prior. I repeat the fact is it didn't happen that way. So it's not safe to say AT ALL. You can't in one reply say he would've done the same thing as Mello or Near and then in the next reply say the two of them were very different from L. You're contradicting yourself. They're facsimiles that do not equal L together since they needed to work off of what L already did to accomplish what he didn't.Mello and N were both students at Whammy's house. That's the basis of my argument. Therefore whatever Watari did to L, he most likely did the same thing to M and N. As I said before, the anime implied something like that through several callbacks to L.
It's clear at this point that we have different standards for quality. Which is why you see none while I do. You don't want to agree with the drop in quality after L's death and you seem to think because the same things happened before continued to happen the quality remained consistent despite how they happened. I disagree.No they're not. Mello and L have more disimilarities than similarities. That would have been the case if there was only one of them. Since there's two, the L aspect(Light's demise) of the show changed. No longer did Light have to worry about what one person was doing. He had to worry about what two people were doing. Mello almost made Light have to kill his own sister. That's just one of the examples of where the quality is still top notch.
They're L's successors, so whether or not they're equal to L doesn't matter at the end of the eay.That does not make them equal to him. That does not mean L would've done the same things they did. If you want to run with this, feel free to dismiss all the other stuff you were saying before which again contradicts these statements.As you said, "No .... sherlock." They're L's successors. Successing implies continuing the work that said predecessor left unfinished.I'm talking about what did happen. You're talking about what he would've done but didn't during the story when trying to catch Kira.You're incorrect because L worked with criminals and he would have worked with any national police agency. He only worked with the Japanese police force because he concluded that Kira was in Japan.You went from same actions to similar. To the implication means they're the same. Which is all false. These examples you're bringing up just reminds me of the rehashes that occurred in the second part of the story which all played a part in the drop in quality. Anyway the last point in that quote still stands to this reply. Nothing you've said here changes it:What I was saying is that the L aspect(Light getting caught slipping) got split into two forces(mello/near).
I wasn't saying that all three characters are the same.
All things being equal, L would have taken similar actions that mello/near did. The show thought highly of deductive skills.
Given the deductive skills that L processes he would have came to the make similar decisions are Near.
L was going to test the DN himself. That's something mello would have done. In fact, I think he almost did it in the anime if I remember correctly.
L revealed to Light that he suspected him of being Kira. That's what near would have done. In fact he did something similar to that by annoncing to the task force that he suspected Light of being Kira.
This here doesn't help anything you're saying. So (the) L (character or protagonist) got split in to two characters. Doesn't change that it was two ppl vs Light or anything else I said in regards to the format in to how Light was taken down. It just continues to show you can't simply swap out Near and Mello for L. Despite similarities, there are clear differences in all 3 characters so you can not say they're the same or would've done the same thing (whether you're talking about the "L aspect" or not).
You're typing just to type.I prefer "You are right and I am wrong."
There was nothing to win here.
Saying I'm typing just to type is the opinion.You're typing just to type.I prefer "You are right and I am wrong."
There was nothing to win here.
So you win at that.
Who was right or wrong is just an opinion.
Saying I'm typing just to type is the opinion.You're typing just to type.I prefer "You are right and I am wrong."
There was nothing to win here.
So you win at that.
Who was right or wrong is just an opinion.
When you come to realize the aforementioned in all of my previous posts then maybe you can see this isn't about winning and losing.
Saying I'm typing just to type is the opinion.
You're typing just to type.I prefer "You are right and I am wrong."
There was nothing to win here.
So you win at that.
Who was right or wrong is just an opinion.
When you come to realize the aforementioned in all of my previous posts then maybe you can see this isn't about winning and losing.
Finally came in (instagram photo).
Info?Finally came in (instagram photo).
Yo link me to the.photo.
Ima do the same thing you did
Dear Breaking Bad Fan...
Endings are, to use Jesse Pinkman's favourite word, a *****. Endings mean saying goodbye, and saying goodbye is hard.
Nobody likes leaving a party too soon. When the music's still playing and the drinks are still flowing and all your buddies are together and laughing and waving you back, come back - Hey, this thing's just getting started! - it feels downright ungrateful not to stick around. Worse, it makes you wonder what great times you'll miss once you're gone.
Over the last few years, many people have asked me why Breaking Bad was leaving the party. Friends and strangers alike told me it was too soon to end the show. I thank them for that highest of compliments. Just as I now thank you.
Yes, you, pal, I'm talking to you. You're the completist who just shelled out good money for our series box set. This, after you bought each and every individual season as they came available (all of which you've now got listed on eBay). And there you sit, cross-legged on the living room floor in front of your new black plastic barrel, which is splayed open atop your coffee table. And you're actually reading the liner notes. I mean, who does that?!
You're the reason we made Breaking Bad in the first place. You're why we sweated the small stuff for six straight years. And why the folks at Sony Home Entertainment busted their butts making what I believe to be the coolest, most complete series box set ever. There are way, way more extras jam-packed into this sucker than are required to satisfy the *****-mistress that is Commerce. This final set represents, dare I say it, a labor of love.
That's because we knew you were out there, raving as much about this show as we do. And that means the world to us.
Believe it or not, you're also the reason we ended Breaking Bad when we did. Because the only thing worse than leaving a party too soon is leaving it too late.
Yours Truly,
Vince Gilligan