- 9,050
- 14,614
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
This explains a lot
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
This explains a lot
How did the family get a 12 mil settlement before the case was over?
That's not how it works.I asked you if it was any different before 2006 before the law you're talking about went into effect and you said you didn't know. The answer is no. They'll do what they please and get away with it regardless of what the law states.
If what you're saying is true that would mean that prior to 2006, police in Louisville couldn't just murder people and get away scot free. You said yourself that you didn't even know if they were prosecuted appropriately at that time. They weren't. It comes across as if you're saying if more people would've just voted in 2006 this never would've happened. It comes across as if you're saying the law and justice are never circumvented by this corrupt system. It comes across as if you're saying the system isn't corrupt.That's not how it works.
The conspiracy is not to go against the laws in place; it is to make sure that the laws overwhelmingly favor cops, even at the expense of the general public, and it's only possible to have those laws in place because of low interest (organic or engineered) in the legislative process.
It's that simple.
Is this true in every instance? Are there any sheriffs and DA's who lean left and these incidents still take place? Please take the question at face valueUnder locally voted in Sheriffs and DA's who lean right because that's where their biggest support is from.
This explains a lot
Your question is for someone who lives in a fantasy world with absolutes, quote them because I wouldn't even imply anything of the sort.Is this true in every instance? Are there any sheriffs and DA's who lean left and these incidents still take place? Please take the question at face value
It was just a question. I guess it happens under left and right leaning jurisdictionsYour question is for someone who lives in a fantasy world with absolutes, quote them because I wouldn't even imply anything of the sort.
Not sure about her being his niece. But he was at their wedding.Is this true?
I couldn't find anything to confirm.
That's a misinterpretation of what I'm saying, which is that the law is not just. What they can do legally is not what they should be doing ethically. Remember that slavery was legal; segregation was legal; a whole bunch of unethical **** was legal before people took upon themselves to change the laws by doing their civic duty, which includes but is not limited to voting. I don't understand how you deducted from my previous comments that the system was not corrupt when I've been saying the exact opposite the whole time. And I don't understand why it's so hard to comprehend that there may be power in the simple act of voting if the people who wish to control you are willing to **** up the postal service (the backbone of a growing online economy) to keep you from exercising that particular right.If what you're saying is true that would mean that prior to 2006, police in Louisville couldn't just murder people and get away scot free. You said yourself that you didn't even know if they were prosecuted appropriately at that time. They weren't. It comes across as if you're saying if more people would've just voted in 2006 this never would've happened. It comes across as if you're saying the law and justice are never circumvented by this corrupt system. It comes across as if you're saying the system isn't corrupt.
That Cameron used to work in McConnell's office is confirmed. I don't know about the family ties, and I wouldn't be surprised if it's just a rumor that is spreading online.Not sure about her being his niece. But he was at their wedding.