aceofjays
Supporter
- 5,167
- 9,264
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2005
I love my city, but I'm glad I moved
Cleveland Top List of the Most %%$%*% US City VOL Nothing We Didn't Already Know
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by Sam Darnold Heisman #8,
- Start date
I love my city, but I'm glad I moved
- 3,170
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2006
Texas FTW!
- 2,715
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2009
Great inference! Finally, someone understands my metaphors. Look up the crime rates for US cities. NYC has the highest crime rate overall, but not in the murder or rape category, so yes, you must be right. It is safe, because people are getting !#!# stolen, but not their lives or their rear ends. That's all what matters, right? At least bad guys in New York follow some of the Commandments, I guess. I'm actually really happy that you'd be willing to recommend me for a job at Forbes. I'll send you a PM when I need that LoR.
On a side note, I don't think you are very friendly... might want to change the name. You know, so that people don't get confused with who they can and who they can't pick on.
- 9,356
- 14
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2008
Buffalo is TERRRRRRIBLEOriginally Posted by aceofjays
I love my city, but I'm glad I moved
- 7,116
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2008
Negative. I've been all over. My step-great grandmother's lived in Little Havana since she escaped from Cuba. But I'm sayin, the city never seemed bad enough to be ranked in the top 10 of the Worst Cities of America.
- 8,148
- 104
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
Holy mother of........... All I got to say is "WOW"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- 1,431
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
How can they factor in sports teams if more than half of those cities don't have any real sports?
- 368
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2008
aww
friendliest ghost
Banned
- 1,182
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2008
And I'm not going to argue numbers with you. The stats are there. But continue believing New York is a more miserable city than Philly, Youngstown, or Gary.
- 8,406
- 41
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2009
How was your day?
- 3,526
- 15
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2008
Dont see how year after year yall put stock in these lists.
- 2,664
- 39
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2008
- 5,215
- 118
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
Sorry but anywhere in the immediate Bay Area is better than Sacramento. Sacramento offers nothing in terms of culture. The arts, food, entertainment... sorry, Sacramento is a hellhole. Even Richmond, although a crime-riddled place, is better since it's in the proximity.Originally Posted by BgL2687
Originally Posted by nawlinsjunkie
@ stockton, modesto, and sac...along with bakersfield and fresno these cities shouldnt even be counted for california b/c of how terrible they arewhats wrong with sac? I mean I can understand stockton and modesto because there really isn't anything to do, but sac is different. Sac is a better place to live compared to alot of cities in the bay area.
so authentic
Banned
- 1,375
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2009
No TX.
- 839
- 30
- Joined
- May 25, 2007
Originally Posted by So Authentic
No TX.
- 17,214
- 8,796
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
- 17,214
- 8,796
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
Get off your crack pipe..Just becuse it's in proximity does not make it better..Vallejo, Richmond, Hayward, Oakland, Pittsburgh, Concord, Alameda, Livermoore are all trash NOT better than Sacramento..Originally Posted by Boys Noize
Sorry but anywhere in the immediate Bay Area is better than Sacramento. Sacramento offers nothing in terms of culture. The arts, food, entertainment... sorry, Sacramento is a hellhole. Even Richmond, although a crime-riddled place, is better since it's in the proximity.Originally Posted by BgL2687
Originally Posted by nawlinsjunkie
@ stockton, modesto, and sac...along with bakersfield and fresno these cities shouldnt even be counted for california b/c of how terrible they arewhats wrong with sac? I mean I can understand stockton and modesto because there really isn't anything to do, but sac is different. Sac is a better place to live compared to alot of cities in the bay area.
- 9,969
- 10,528
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2007
I still don't see how Buffalo and Detroit are not ahead of us, I been to both, and they both look 12302 x more depressing
- 9,453
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2009
Originally Posted by kimahrioftheronsotribe
Originally Posted by So Authentic
No TX.
- 719
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2002
What the %++$ ever...damn shame Frank Jackson isn't anywhere near the calibre of Mike White. We'll see what happens when Gilbert gets his casino opened, that will help the short-term economy.
- 8,406
- 41
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2009
Livermore? Livermore? aka to Live No More? and Concord?
j/p those places are nice.
j/p those places are nice.
- 4,617
- 230
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2007
Ohio always takes L's, Suprised the armpit of America Youngstown is not on that list
- 5,215
- 118
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
So what makes Sacramento better than all of those places? Please enlighten us all. Pittsburgh, Concord, and Livermore aren't even really cities one would consider part of the Bay Area although I'd much rather live in Concord or Livermore than Sacramento. Vallejo and Richmond are pretty lame but, like I said, they're in the area. Better than being almost two hours away and having Davis as the biggest major city nearbyOriginally Posted by NikeTalker23
Get off your crack pipe..Just becuse it's in proximity does not make it better..Vallejo, Richmond, Hayward, Oakland, Pittsburgh, Concord, Alameda, Livermoore are all trash NOT better than Sacramento..Originally Posted by Boys Noize
Sorry but anywhere in the immediate Bay Area is better than Sacramento. Sacramento offers nothing in terms of culture. The arts, food, entertainment... sorry, Sacramento is a hellhole. Even Richmond, although a crime-riddled place, is better since it's in the proximity.Originally Posted by BgL2687
Originally Posted by nawlinsjunkie
@ stockton, modesto, and sac...along with bakersfield and fresno these cities shouldnt even be counted for california b/c of how terrible they arewhats wrong with sac? I mean I can understand stockton and modesto because there really isn't anything to do, but sac is different. Sac is a better place to live compared to alot of cities in the bay area.
edit: At least Sacramento isn't Cleveland?
- 30,266
- 33,405
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2006
Originally Posted by NikeTalker23
Get off your crack pipe..Just becuse it's in proximity does not make it better..Vallejo, Richmond, Hayward, Oakland, Pittsburgh, Concord, Alameda, Livermoore are all trash NOT better than Sacramento..Originally Posted by Boys Noize
Sorry but anywhere in the immediate Bay Area is better than Sacramento. Sacramento offers nothing in terms of culture. The arts, food, entertainment... sorry, Sacramento is a hellhole. Even Richmond, although a crime-riddled place, is better since it's in the proximity.Originally Posted by BgL2687
Originally Posted by nawlinsjunkie
@ stockton, modesto, and sac...along with bakersfield and fresno these cities shouldnt even be counted for california b/c of how terrible they arewhats wrong with sac? I mean I can understand stockton and modesto because there really isn't anything to do, but sac is different. Sac is a better place to live compared to alot of cities in the bay area.
Fairfield>>>>>
- 872
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2006
I love Cleveland. I am moving to Toledo in June and am dreading leaving C-town.
Theres 2 people that live in Cleveland...people that hate Cleveland and want to leave and people that love Cleveland and never want to leave.
Call me Clevelander #2
Theres 2 people that live in Cleveland...people that hate Cleveland and want to leave and people that love Cleveland and never want to leave.
Call me Clevelander #2