- 218
- 10
Ok, how was this shoe supposed to be more revolutionary than it is? It has NO GLUE! Its basically a shoe all in one piece. For a performance bball shoe, thatsamazing. We have only seen ONE SIDE of the shoe. Like others have previously pointed out, there is way more to this shoe. Most of you haters are reactingwithout even thinking about the words coming out of your mouths. THERE ARE LIMITS TO SHOE DESIGN! Alot of people are saying that these arent revolutionaryenough. OH really? that leaked pic, alot of you call crap, ugly, a rbk, a dada, and unoriginal is $185.00. Your crying about that price. If the shoe was trullyrevolutionary, do you think its price would be that low???? Could you even afford it???? Would nike be able to produce enough to meet demand???? NO, no, andno. Continuing with this shoe being revolutionary, I want to know from haters how the sahpe of the shoe, which fits on a foot and peoples feet havent changedor mutated, should be different? Is it supposed to be a shoe thats not a shoe? Was the shoe supposed to fit on your head? I would like to know from hatersspecifically with drawings and descriptions how this shoe was supposed to be MORE revolutionary( shape, tech, etc. ) AND be under $200.00? We only have smallidea of what this shoe is. We have one, one-dimensional b&w pic, know the shoe was made with no glue making it one whole piece, and the design was nativeamerican inspired. This idea of the shoe not being revolutionary is a joke because those of you dreaming of how more revolutionary it should have been, werenteven thinking if it was monetarily, or technologically possible to even make such a shoe. MORE TECH=MORE $$$$$=only 5% of the people in this forum being ableto cop. Get a grip on reality haters. The shoe is amazing for what it is.