- 87,849
- 50,353
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
Somehow adopted and never brought up?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
So his moms just hallucinated giving birth to him?I'm going to go with adopted
I always thought he was asian
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2016/02/11/exclusive-batman-animated-toy-line/80222456/
Going to get old Bruce Wayne
The other site said "go forward as is" so I guess that means no reshoots not that they would be cancelledWhy would it say that Suicide Squad and WW are still happening when one is already done shooting and the other is probably midway through it already?
Just doesn't make much sense.
I'm not putting any stock in this..Saw this rumor on another site
http://m.hitfix.com/the-dartboard/b...d-dcs-entire-slate-be-in-jeopardy-fandemonium
From what I got from it
- The film isn't bad, just not what they wanted
- Affleck and Eisenberg were loved the rest, not so much
- Superman is still a mess
- rumor that they are rethinking the future of the cinematic universe
- suicide squad and Wonder Woman are still happening
- trying to get Affledk to do a solo batman movie and refocus the CU around him
- Snyder wouldn't direct the JL movie
All rumors though
I read it more as that They are still probably gonna have a JL movie, but they would likely scrap cyborg, flash and maybe aqua man, and instead have 1 or 2 batman movies to bridge the gapoh ok, that makes more sense
I still wouldn't believe it though until they see the box office and audience reaction to the film
If they didn't budge on 56% RT score for MoS, can't imagine them jumping ship now unless it is F4 bad
exactly.. batman's origin has been done enough.. if 'year one' batman is 25.. going with that age range batman is perfect (he would be at least 5 years in by that point)Yea. I would of loved to see a 30-35 year old bats. Still in his prime. Something of an Arkham City story.
If batman just brutalized these thugs, I can only imagine what he did to the joker after he killed robin.
I don't get this cuz a few months ago there was a report they showed the movie to WB execs and they gave a standing ovation. What changed?Saw this rumor on another site
http://m.hitfix.com/the-dartboard/b...d-dcs-entire-slate-be-in-jeopardy-fandemonium
From what I got from it
- The film isn't bad, just not what they wanted
- Affleck and Eisenberg were loved the rest, not so much
- Superman is still a mess
- rumor that they are rethinking the future of the cinematic universe
- suicide squad and Wonder Woman are still happening
- trying to get Affledk to do a solo batman movie and refocus the CU around him
- Snyder wouldn't direct the JL movie
All rumors though
True.It's a smart move to focus the CU on Battfleck anyway
True.Thought it was a bad move from the start to go from MoS to BvS, SQ, Wonder Woman, and then a Justice League film.
That's honestly not that different from Nolan's Bats. He had the big tech stuff but was pretty physical. Seems Snyder's Bats is just more brutal.Synder said his Batman was more of a physical dude and less focused on gadgets and technology and I'm glad to see he made do on that promise
Wondering if Battfleck is subtly animated by CGI when fighting
Word. That's how I felt during that time tooso basically what we all thought is slowly being confirmed. WB was desperate to catch up w/ Marvel and didnt plan accordingly
they had me very skeptical when MoS2 became Bats v Supes which then became Bats v Supes + WW.