Really? I haven't recalled any slaughter on a mass scale, in the last 200+ years.
Unless you're referring to the American Indian Holocaust, which I really hope you're not.
So just make up something why don't you...dudes coming in here making up fictional conflicts.
Looking at the world realistically, what do you foresee in the future? This is a theory based thread, I've seen your posts on many topics and can tell you're a level headed dude. I'd like to know where you see the world going in the next 50 to 100 years based on history and current events.
at these dudes in here stirring the pot w responses to bs obv ridic conspiracies
What?
He just tried to switch it up in his last post. He WAS talking about the U.S.
He might claim that he isn't now though.
It stemmed from bombings in Boston, (which is in the U.S) to an American Holocaust . Why would I think that he wasn't referring to the U.S?
you guys going back and forth is hilarious
Looking at the world realistically, what do you foresee in the future? This is a theory based thread, I've seen your posts on many topics and can tell you're a level headed dude. I'd like to know where you see the world going in the next 50 to 100 years based on history and current events.
I see the world getting better overall....
Compared to 200 years ago...there is currently less violence and people have more rights overall.
I don't really see this trend making any major changes unless there is drastic change in the world or somehow 1st world nations fall
Man you're one of those guys that can't have a civil conversation without insults huh?
You said AMERICAN HOLOCAUST. There's a book about this stuff called The American Holocaust. Its based on European conquests from 1490 on.
Considering Europeans founded this country (after leaving their own countries to be FREE of all things) you would think a person could connect some dots.
Anyone can read if they learn. If you can't think independently you're ****** regardless.
When have I insulted you? Technically, there was never an American Holocuast, like you stated there was. We were talking about the United States of America, and you claimed there was a holocaust which already took place in the united states of AMERICA. You tried to mock me with "History is a great Teacher" while not knowing that you were in fact , Ethering yourself.
Tis all, mate. Your attempt of switching the meaning of your statement is pretty funny though.
You can honestly tell who hasn't seen sunlight in a few months, in this thread. Some people are in their own little world.
From Aliens to The American Holocaust.
We weren't talking about the U.S? You weren't referring to the American Indian Holocaust occuring in the U.S?
View media item 383471
Wow, dude. Scary really.
Just stop, son. You're embarrassing yourself, writing up paragraphs trying to make someone believe you. :x
Since you clearly understood my "American Holocaust" statement. What does your so called "this is what I really meant by it" American holocaust have anything to do with mass murders in the U.S?
Who the hell is Dave Hodges??
I see you rely on google for most of the stuff you post, but you shouldn't go around thinking everyone else is like you though, man. Paranoid thinking seems to spill over all aspects of logic for you
Again, this pic was posted and went viral before sunset on 4/15.
Calling "Nick Vogt" an actor would indicate that his legs were not blown off as the upper left suggests. This pic was posted both in this thread and the other bombing thread.
There are probably people that still think that Jeff Bauman = Nick Vogt...
Anyways... I've seen plenty of youtube vids claiming that while Jeff was being pushed someone (an agent/actor) had to "put his leg back on" because the prosthetic was falling off.
This website talks the gullible into thinking that someone was "putting his legs on" right after the bombing...
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/bostonbombingdidyouthink20apr13.shtml
I mean... its undeniable that Jeff Bauman is the person who was there and in that wheelchair picture - yet the beat goes on for these people trying to say he had fake legs on. They cite that if he had really had his legs blown off he'd have bled out in less than 2 minutes... yadda yadda...
Considering that Jeff is in pictures prior to the incident and he is standing at the bomb site a few feet away, you can disqualify this claim that he had prosthetic gore on his legs.
You can also say that IF he did have prosthetic legs that the bomb was indeed "hollywood fluff/special effects" and was harmless.
But he can go from standing with real prosthetics to down on the ground with blood and skin and bones sticking out from his fake leg's everywhere.
Accusing the bomb of being fake would have what effect on the 5 year old kid and the others that in this case "died"?
