lightweight champion
Banned
- 13,481
- 5,271
C'mon dude don't act like my man Dave Corzine wasn't a force! Jordan also had Kyle Macy and John Paxson as his backcourt mates, of course they should've defeated Boston!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude, that was the '87 playoffs (and just know that Kevin McHale played those entire playoffs on a broken foot). Jordan had his 63 point game in Game 2 of '86, but aside from that, Boston destroyed them (123-104, 122-104 in the other games).Originally Posted by BlazerFan
The 86 Bulls and young Mike were swept by Boston losing by 4, 9, & 11 respectively. Why don't you go look at who young Mike was working with compared to when they won their titles. So this "they wouldn't have won 6 and it's not debatable" crap is utter garbage. It's two different eras making it all completely debatable.
*Sips*
Dude, that was the '87 playoffs (and just know that Kevin McHale played those entire playoffs on a broken foot). Jordan had his 63 point game in Game 2 of '86, but aside from that, Boston destroyed them (123-104, 122-104 in the other games).Originally Posted by BlazerFan
The 86 Bulls and young Mike were swept by Boston losing by 4, 9, & 11 respectively. Why don't you go look at who young Mike was working with compared to when they won their titles. So this "they wouldn't have won 6 and it's not debatable" crap is utter garbage. It's two different eras making it all completely debatable.
*Sips*
Cool.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Dude, that was the '87 playoffs (and just know that Kevin McHale played those entire playoffs on a broken foot). Jordan had his 63 point game in Game 2 of '86, but aside from that, Boston destroyed them (123-104, 122-104 in the other games).Originally Posted by BlazerFan
The 86 Bulls and young Mike were swept by Boston losing by 4, 9, & 11 respectively. Why don't you go look at who young Mike was working with compared to when they won their titles. So this "they wouldn't have won 6 and it's not debatable" crap is utter garbage. It's two different eras making it all completely debatable.
*Sips*
The '86 Celtics were a juggernaut. They lost ONE home game the entire season, including playoffs. They knew they were unbeatable at home, so they got bored and mailed in a bunch of road games.
Cool.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Dude, that was the '87 playoffs (and just know that Kevin McHale played those entire playoffs on a broken foot). Jordan had his 63 point game in Game 2 of '86, but aside from that, Boston destroyed them (123-104, 122-104 in the other games).Originally Posted by BlazerFan
The 86 Bulls and young Mike were swept by Boston losing by 4, 9, & 11 respectively. Why don't you go look at who young Mike was working with compared to when they won their titles. So this "they wouldn't have won 6 and it's not debatable" crap is utter garbage. It's two different eras making it all completely debatable.
*Sips*
The '86 Celtics were a juggernaut. They lost ONE home game the entire season, including playoffs. They knew they were unbeatable at home, so they got bored and mailed in a bunch of road games.
My literal reaction reading the title and some postsOriginally Posted by JohnnyRedStorm
This is by far the dumbest thread I've read on NT.
My literal reaction reading the title and some postsOriginally Posted by JohnnyRedStorm
This is by far the dumbest thread I've read on NT.
Okay, I'll bite: The '87 Bulls had one more year experience than when they lost the previous season, so they're not "still the '86 Bulls." The Celtics had just been to the Finals three years in a row, winning two. The Celtics began to break down in '87 physically (as I said, McHale played on a broken foot for the end of it) and emotionally (Len Bias). The Bulls played better against a worn-out team they had experience against. In '86, at full health, the Celtics ran through the eastern playoffs with only one loss. The '87 Celtics struggled to make the Finals, going seven games twice just to get there. Keep in mind they went four years in a row when the league was at its competitive apex. They got run out of the gym by the Lakers. They were completely worn out by those playoffs.Originally Posted by BlazerFan
Still the 86' Bulls. Tell me something I don't know.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Dude, that was the '87 playoffs (and just know that Kevin McHale played those entire playoffs on a broken foot). Jordan had his 63 point game in Game 2 of '86, but aside from that, Boston destroyed them (123-104, 122-104 in the other games).Originally Posted by BlazerFan
The 86 Bulls and young Mike were swept by Boston losing by 4, 9, & 11 respectively. Why don't you go look at who young Mike was working with compared to when they won their titles. So this "they wouldn't have won 6 and it's not debatable" crap is utter garbage. It's two different eras making it all completely debatable.
*Sips*
The '86 Celtics were a juggernaut. They lost ONE home game the entire season, including playoffs. They knew they were unbeatable at home, so they got bored and mailed in a bunch of road games.
Okay, I'll bite: The '87 Bulls had one more year experience than when they lost the previous season, so they're not "still the '86 Bulls." The Celtics had just been to the Finals three years in a row, winning two. The Celtics began to break down in '87 physically (as I said, McHale played on a broken foot for the end of it) and emotionally (Len Bias). The Bulls played better against a worn-out team they had experience against. In '86, at full health, the Celtics ran through the eastern playoffs with only one loss. The '87 Celtics struggled to make the Finals, going seven games twice just to get there. Keep in mind they went four years in a row when the league was at its competitive apex. They got run out of the gym by the Lakers. They were completely worn out by those playoffs.Originally Posted by BlazerFan
Still the 86' Bulls. Tell me something I don't know.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Dude, that was the '87 playoffs (and just know that Kevin McHale played those entire playoffs on a broken foot). Jordan had his 63 point game in Game 2 of '86, but aside from that, Boston destroyed them (123-104, 122-104 in the other games).Originally Posted by BlazerFan
The 86 Bulls and young Mike were swept by Boston losing by 4, 9, & 11 respectively. Why don't you go look at who young Mike was working with compared to when they won their titles. So this "they wouldn't have won 6 and it's not debatable" crap is utter garbage. It's two different eras making it all completely debatable.
*Sips*
The '86 Celtics were a juggernaut. They lost ONE home game the entire season, including playoffs. They knew they were unbeatable at home, so they got bored and mailed in a bunch of road games.
Nevermind the semantics of 86' or 86-87. You are missing the point. Those teams are still referred to as some of the best teams in league history and MJ was just getting his feet wet with a weak supporting cast. I don't take offense to the greatness of those teams... I got a box full of beta tapes to remind me. I take offense to the notion that MJ's title teams couldn't run with them.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Okay, I'll bite: The '87 Bulls had one more year experience than when they lost the previous season, so they're not "still the '86 Bulls." The Celtics had just been to the Finals three years in a row, winning two. The Celtics began to break down in '87 physically (as I said, McHale played on a broken foot for the end of it) and emotionally (Len Bias). The Bulls played better against a worn-out team they had experience against. In '86, at full health, the Celtics ran through the eastern playoffs with only one loss. The '87 Celtics struggled to make the Finals, going seven games twice just to get there. Keep in mind they went four years in a row when the league was at its competitive apex. They got run out of the gym by the Lakers. They were completely worn out by those playoffs.Originally Posted by BlazerFan
Still the 86' Bulls. Tell me something I don't know.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Dude, that was the '87 playoffs (and just know that Kevin McHale played those entire playoffs on a broken foot). Jordan had his 63 point game in Game 2 of '86, but aside from that, Boston destroyed them (123-104, 122-104 in the other games).
The '86 Celtics were a juggernaut. They lost ONE home game the entire season, including playoffs. They knew they were unbeatable at home, so they got bored and mailed in a bunch of road games.
Nevermind the semantics of 86' or 86-87. You are missing the point. Those teams are still referred to as some of the best teams in league history and MJ was just getting his feet wet with a weak supporting cast. I don't take offense to the greatness of those teams... I got a box full of beta tapes to remind me. I take offense to the notion that MJ's title teams couldn't run with them.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Okay, I'll bite: The '87 Bulls had one more year experience than when they lost the previous season, so they're not "still the '86 Bulls." The Celtics had just been to the Finals three years in a row, winning two. The Celtics began to break down in '87 physically (as I said, McHale played on a broken foot for the end of it) and emotionally (Len Bias). The Bulls played better against a worn-out team they had experience against. In '86, at full health, the Celtics ran through the eastern playoffs with only one loss. The '87 Celtics struggled to make the Finals, going seven games twice just to get there. Keep in mind they went four years in a row when the league was at its competitive apex. They got run out of the gym by the Lakers. They were completely worn out by those playoffs.Originally Posted by BlazerFan
Still the 86' Bulls. Tell me something I don't know.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Dude, that was the '87 playoffs (and just know that Kevin McHale played those entire playoffs on a broken foot). Jordan had his 63 point game in Game 2 of '86, but aside from that, Boston destroyed them (123-104, 122-104 in the other games).
The '86 Celtics were a juggernaut. They lost ONE home game the entire season, including playoffs. They knew they were unbeatable at home, so they got bored and mailed in a bunch of road games.
Originally Posted by BlazerFan
Nevermind the semantics of 86' or 86-87. You are missing the point. Those teams are still referred to as some of the best teams in league history and MJ was just getting his feet wet with a weak supporting cast. I don't take offense to the greatness of those teams... I got a box full of beta tapes to remind me. I take offense to the notion that MJ's title teams couldn't run with them.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Okay, I'll bite: The '87 Bulls had one more year experience than when they lost the previous season, so they're not "still the '86 Bulls." The Celtics had just been to the Finals three years in a row, winning two. The Celtics began to break down in '87 physically (as I said, McHale played on a broken foot for the end of it) and emotionally (Len Bias). The Bulls played better against a worn-out team they had experience against. In '86, at full health, the Celtics ran through the eastern playoffs with only one loss. The '87 Celtics struggled to make the Finals, going seven games twice just to get there. Keep in mind they went four years in a row when the league was at its competitive apex. They got run out of the gym by the Lakers. They were completely worn out by those playoffs.Originally Posted by BlazerFan
Still the 86' Bulls. Tell me something I don't know.
Originally Posted by BlazerFan
Nevermind the semantics of 86' or 86-87. You are missing the point. Those teams are still referred to as some of the best teams in league history and MJ was just getting his feet wet with a weak supporting cast. I don't take offense to the greatness of those teams... I got a box full of beta tapes to remind me. I take offense to the notion that MJ's title teams couldn't run with them.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Okay, I'll bite: The '87 Bulls had one more year experience than when they lost the previous season, so they're not "still the '86 Bulls." The Celtics had just been to the Finals three years in a row, winning two. The Celtics began to break down in '87 physically (as I said, McHale played on a broken foot for the end of it) and emotionally (Len Bias). The Bulls played better against a worn-out team they had experience against. In '86, at full health, the Celtics ran through the eastern playoffs with only one loss. The '87 Celtics struggled to make the Finals, going seven games twice just to get there. Keep in mind they went four years in a row when the league was at its competitive apex. They got run out of the gym by the Lakers. They were completely worn out by those playoffs.Originally Posted by BlazerFan
Still the 86' Bulls. Tell me something I don't know.
We'll never know is the point and all this not winning 6 is just hot air. All we do know is the man never lost in the Finals.Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
Originally Posted by BlazerFan
Nevermind the semantics of 86' or 86-87. You are missing the point. Those teams are still referred to as some of the best teams in league history and MJ was just getting his feet wet with a weak supporting cast. I don't take offense to the greatness of those teams... I got a box full of beta tapes to remind me. I take offense to the notion that MJ's title teams couldn't run with them.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Okay, I'll bite: The '87 Bulls had one more year experience than when they lost the previous season, so they're not "still the '86 Bulls." The Celtics had just been to the Finals three years in a row, winning two. The Celtics began to break down in '87 physically (as I said, McHale played on a broken foot for the end of it) and emotionally (Len Bias). The Bulls played better against a worn-out team they had experience against. In '86, at full health, the Celtics ran through the eastern playoffs with only one loss. The '87 Celtics struggled to make the Finals, going seven games twice just to get there. Keep in mind they went four years in a row when the league was at its competitive apex. They got run out of the gym by the Lakers. They were completely worn out by those playoffs.
who's saying that? your not being realistic though.
from what im getting at, you really think the 90's bulls would win 6 titles in the 1980's against teams that actually won stuff themselves and are regarded as some of the best teams in nba history, (which the 90's bulls are regarded as also). bottom line, but the bulls in their prime in the 1980's their not winning 6, but boston and the lakers don't win as many titles as they ended up winning during that time as well.
We'll never know is the point and all this not winning 6 is just hot air. All we do know is the man never lost in the Finals.Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
Originally Posted by BlazerFan
Nevermind the semantics of 86' or 86-87. You are missing the point. Those teams are still referred to as some of the best teams in league history and MJ was just getting his feet wet with a weak supporting cast. I don't take offense to the greatness of those teams... I got a box full of beta tapes to remind me. I take offense to the notion that MJ's title teams couldn't run with them.Originally Posted by dmbrhs
Okay, I'll bite: The '87 Bulls had one more year experience than when they lost the previous season, so they're not "still the '86 Bulls." The Celtics had just been to the Finals three years in a row, winning two. The Celtics began to break down in '87 physically (as I said, McHale played on a broken foot for the end of it) and emotionally (Len Bias). The Bulls played better against a worn-out team they had experience against. In '86, at full health, the Celtics ran through the eastern playoffs with only one loss. The '87 Celtics struggled to make the Finals, going seven games twice just to get there. Keep in mind they went four years in a row when the league was at its competitive apex. They got run out of the gym by the Lakers. They were completely worn out by those playoffs.
who's saying that? your not being realistic though.
from what im getting at, you really think the 90's bulls would win 6 titles in the 1980's against teams that actually won stuff themselves and are regarded as some of the best teams in nba history, (which the 90's bulls are regarded as also). bottom line, but the bulls in their prime in the 1980's their not winning 6, but boston and the lakers don't win as many titles as they ended up winning during that time as well.
Originally Posted by trunks206
Originally Posted by 6dollaBURGER
Not only did Jordan play in a watered down era, but he was allowed to handcheck! Not to mention people didn't have the technology of today - players today are better plus they can make hella modifications to themselves to make themselves even better -
This %!++ quickly moving from bad to worse.
Originally Posted by trunks206
Originally Posted by 6dollaBURGER
Not only did Jordan play in a watered down era, but he was allowed to handcheck! Not to mention people didn't have the technology of today - players today are better plus they can make hella modifications to themselves to make themselves even better -
This %!++ quickly moving from bad to worse.
The league added four teams in '88 and '89. That waters things down tremendously.Originally Posted by JoeClear
The league had more than a few bum shooting guards in the 90's, but the NBA wasn't watered down at all
The league added four teams in '88 and '89. That waters things down tremendously.Originally Posted by JoeClear
The league had more than a few bum shooting guards in the 90's, but the NBA wasn't watered down at all