While both are considered games, they are not equitable
I ****in hate the sound of cammed ls engines or anything cammed in general, that loping sound just sounds like straight garbage, like a farm truck or something
Actually makes sense as I gave it more thought.
Now mind you I'm not talking about games like WoW, but other than that:
-Cost of entry is absurd; any two current gen systems are about equal to the cost of a build considered 'decent'
-parts quickly become obsolete
-Most PC game setups I have seen have the person within sneezing distance of the screen, which means you're not actually far enough away to appreciate any differences in graphics
-Windows is required
-Physical ownership of a game >>> Paying for access/keys
-Haven't seen an interesting mod yet (I've seen impressive stuff, but nothing I'd want to download)
That's all I've got for now
or would he?
Unless you love The Last of Us or Uncharted like that, your setup may be redundant.That was the worst take I've seen on PC gaming in a while. Thought those opinions were left in 2012.
And I have a Switch and PS4 along with PC
Unless you love The Last of Us or Uncharted like that, your setup may be redundant.
I've played on a top-end gaming PC, and I'm in possession of an entry-level one, so what I'm saying isn't a biased, pro-console/anti-PC take.
That said, it would seem like the only way to make PC gaming better than console, is to spend hundreds (thousands?) more than the actual consoles, just to play the same games with community add-ons. That to me, is not worth it. To each their own though.
1. XBL and PS+ actively provides free games monthly that may not offset steam sales, but they deserve a mention. And I'm pretty sure I can't build an equal or better computer for what I paid for my Xbox/PS4 & Switch. Matter of fact, let's remove the switch from the equation because the switch is a different lane than home consoles. Can you build something equal to or better than an Xbox or PS4 with $250? $350? Is it not more of a rolling investment since parts have to be updated over time?
2. Future proof?
3. Still doesn't undermine being too close to the screen to appreciate said graphical improvements. And most people on a monitor? Strongly doubt it.
4. Pretty much. Windows still sucks though.
5. Agreed. That's a fair assessment. But until physical is phased out, it's better to have games you can sell/have control of regardless of internet connection, no?
6. See #3 regarding graphics. Isn't there an Xbox that does mods too now? Is that still solely a PC thing? Either way, I don't care too much for mods save for Bethesda bug fixes.
Unless you love The Last of Us or Uncharted like that, your setup may be redundant.
I've played on a top-end gaming PC, and I'm in possession of an entry-level one, so what I'm saying isn't a biased, pro-console/anti-PC take.
That said, it would seem like the only way to make PC gaming better than console, is to spend hundreds (thousands?) more than the actual consoles, just to play the same games with community add-ons. That to me, is not worth it. To each their own though.
I agree. I got my 8th grade neice an iPhone for Xmas and my sister has had to take the phone away from her. I should have waited until she was a lil older to cop her a phone.
so u gonna get em used to tablets, but as soon as they gotta make a call your relegating em to prehistoric razrs?
Yea, you should have known better.
