Educate me on Range Rovers

[atlien seeko]

Originally Posted by UptownsDotNetStacky

scshift wrote:

---

Originally Posted by Al Audi

why would you compare gtr to a range rover?

Because they're the same price. And the GTR is faster and more reliable, as well as looks better and I hate SUVs. OP was talking about what rides were worth 80k and I'd take the GTR any day. (not that I've driven either)

Ones a truck, and the other is a supercar....so yeah, what you said makes no sense


But.. It does...  Like someone mentioned before, the Range is a status icon vehicle. You can get trucks for a lot cheaper than that that will serve the same purpose, so I don think were talking in terms of practical use... And with that said, I'd go with the GT-R too

 

[JD617]

They're status vehicles.
That pretty much sums it up.

 

[JD617]

They're status vehicles.
That pretty much sums it up.

 

[Bert.]

Originally Posted by JD617

They're status vehicles.

That pretty much sums it up.

yea maybe if you live in Idaho, they arent status vehicles anymore

 

[Bert.]

Originally Posted by JD617

They're status vehicles.

That pretty much sums it up.

yea maybe if you live in Idaho, they arent status vehicles anymore

 

[moneymike88]

http://niketalk.com/topic/164669

here is a thread that was talking about its reliability

 

[napoleon]

Also... for the past 10 years they've been in the BOTTOM 5-10 vehicles AND brands.

 

[moneymike88]

http://niketalk.com/topic/164669

here is a thread that was talking about its reliability

 

[napoleon]

Also... for the past 10 years they've been in the BOTTOM 5-10 vehicles AND brands.

 

[mplsdunk]

Originally Posted by Zyzz

Originally Posted by Lalph Rauren

you cannot get a gtr for 80k

yea ummmmmm ok


yes you can

Word who told him that. You can get them for under 70k.

 

[mangudai954]

Lol @ RR's not being status symbols.

 

[mplsdunk]

Originally Posted by Zyzz

Originally Posted by Lalph Rauren

you cannot get a gtr for 80k

yea ummmmmm ok


yes you can

Word who told him that. You can get them for under 70k.

 

[mangudai954]

Lol @ RR's not being status symbols.

 

[scshift]

Originally Posted by ATLien Seeko

Originally Posted by UptownsDotNetStacky

scshift wrote:

---

Originally Posted by Al Audi

why would you compare gtr to a range rover?

Because they're the same price. And the GTR is faster and more reliable, as well as looks better and I hate SUVs. OP was talking about what rides were worth 80k and I'd take the GTR any day. (not that I've driven either)

Ones a truck, and the other is a supercar....so yeah, what you said makes no sense

But.. It does...  Like someone mentioned before, the Range is a status icon vehicle. You can get trucks for a lot cheaper than that that will serve the same purpose, so I don think were talking in terms of practical use... And with that said, I'd go with the GT-R too

Exactly. I can definitely compare the two because for the money, I'd take the GTR. The argument is what I'd spend 80k on, not which one is better. And it's not like the people who buy Range Rovers use them for "truck" uses anyways... most of them have them to cruise and for the attention... hence why I said it was a status vehicle.

 

[scshift]

Originally Posted by ATLien Seeko

Originally Posted by UptownsDotNetStacky

scshift wrote:

---

Originally Posted by Al Audi

why would you compare gtr to a range rover?

Because they're the same price. And the GTR is faster and more reliable, as well as looks better and I hate SUVs. OP was talking about what rides were worth 80k and I'd take the GTR any day. (not that I've driven either)

Ones a truck, and the other is a supercar....so yeah, what you said makes no sense

But.. It does...  Like someone mentioned before, the Range is a status icon vehicle. You can get trucks for a lot cheaper than that that will serve the same purpose, so I don think were talking in terms of practical use... And with that said, I'd go with the GT-R too

Exactly. I can definitely compare the two because for the money, I'd take the GTR. The argument is what I'd spend 80k on, not which one is better. And it's not like the people who buy Range Rovers use them for "truck" uses anyways... most of them have them to cruise and for the attention... hence why I said it was a status vehicle.

 

[JD617]

Originally Posted by Zyzz

Originally Posted by JD617

They're status vehicles.

That pretty much sums it up.

yea maybe if you live in Idaho, they arent status vehicles anymore
You're from Detroit though. A Range costs more than some houses there.

 

[JD617]

Originally Posted by Zyzz

Originally Posted by JD617

They're status vehicles.

That pretty much sums it up.

yea maybe if you live in Idaho, they arent status vehicles anymore
You're from Detroit though. A Range costs more than some houses there.

 

[napoleon]

Originally Posted by JD617

Originally Posted by Zyzz

Originally Posted by JD617

They're status vehicles.

That pretty much sums it up.

yea maybe if you live in Idaho, they arent status vehicles anymore

You're from Detroit though. A Range costs more than some houses there.

 

 

[napoleon]

Originally Posted by JD617

Originally Posted by Zyzz

Originally Posted by JD617

They're status vehicles.

That pretty much sums it up.

yea maybe if you live in Idaho, they arent status vehicles anymore

You're from Detroit though. A Range costs more than some houses there.

 

 

[mangudai954]

 

[mangudai954]

 

[0cks]

Is he lyin though? Homes can be had for the price of a used civic south of 8th mile....

 

[0cks]

Is he lyin though? Homes can be had for the price of a used civic south of 8th mile....

 

[mplsdunk]

I can see how some think it's a status symbol. But it's really nothing major. Pulling up in a phantom is a status symbol. Range is just an everyday suv in the burbs.

 

[mplsdunk]

I can see how some think it's a status symbol. But it's really nothing major. Pulling up in a phantom is a status symbol. Range is just an everyday suv in the burbs.