- May 15, 2003
- 56,921
- 66,296
Foams are always true to size unless you're fat or have wide flat feet
Foamposite One Retro..Black/Red..the right way this time
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by ii0ii703 rico rob,
- Start date
- Jul 8, 2001
- 4,277
- 86
DTLR has started marking these down already: $170
- Sep 16, 2010
- 5,239
- 7,601
Why are these in Low demand? This is not a bad looking colorway..
- Mar 20, 2008
- 2,100
- 660
If these sit like the pearls i will wait another month.
bigj505
Staff member
- Jan 23, 2007
- 42,583
- 21,804
1. they released months ago so people that really wanted them got them already
2. a lot of people like the 07s better
3. foams arent hyped like they used to be ever since nike started dropping colors more often.
- May 11, 2010
- 8,955
- 4,919
I have to disagree with #3.I think hype for foams are higher than ever. Ebay, and craigslist have more foams up for sale than previous years. Look at how much used foams like cactus, dooms, pros, are going for, most are above retail.
I think another reason why the coughdrops and pearls arent selling so quickly is because nike&JB are releasing classic retros almost every month. And most people wont buy the shoe that costs the most ($200 Foams), so Lebrons, Kobes and Jordans that retail for less will sell quicker. Less price. But we ultimately benefit from this market saturation through sales.
bigj505
Staff member
- Jan 23, 2007
- 42,583
- 21,804
^^^ say what u want but people arent really excited about foams like that no more.
- Jul 29, 2008
- 2,156
- 12
i think the cheap mold had alot to do with it also.. did the 2010 egg stay in stores this long? i remember dudes were lining up for those, i was one of them
- Aug 6, 2001
- 12,885
- 2,739
True.
Last year, when the eggplants dropped again - I think was when the Foam hype was at an all-time high. You can always asscociate the word 'hype' with 'limited' so in this case, as soon as the Foams became more abundant (not at limited availability), the less interested people became (general public).
This was Nike's fault. The 2010 Eggplant release (horrible mold
- Dec 2, 2005
- 15
- 11
Animal Thug1539 wrote:
This was Nike's fault. The 2010 Eggplant release (horrible mold) was so uneccessary. It was an attempt to test the market's demand, which actually did good - but for the short term...
So do these have a better mold?
- Aug 6, 2001
- 12,885
- 2,739
Not sure about these Black/Red pairs. I haven't seen them in person yet.
But in comparision to the eggplant foamposite pair's, here's the difference in mold between the 2009 & 2010 release:
2009 (courtesy of never wear them)
2010:
Notice the difference in the grooves and color...
really pointless release (2010) IMO.
But in comparision to the eggplant foamposite pair's, here's the difference in mold between the 2009 & 2010 release:
2009 (courtesy of never wear them)
2010:
Notice the difference in the grooves and color...
- Nov 12, 2010
- 715
- 10
These and eggplants are the best IMO.
balloonoboy
Banned
- Nov 13, 2009
- 9,784
- 481
Colorway just isn't good.
Royals will smoke.
Royals will smoke.
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,048
- 24,223
this colorway shouldn't of been re-released...we're looking at a 3rd run of these...
im STILL waiting on da white orlando P.E. joints to drop.
im STILL waiting on da white orlando P.E. joints to drop.
- Aug 25, 2008
- 3,923
- 658
you and me both
- Apr 24, 2009
- 290
- 10
thats what im talkin about
- Jan 19, 2007
- 20,550
- 18,844
Hey should retro the wht/blk Penny PE and the blk/blk with a ice sole.
- Jun 2, 2010
- 369
- 10
Foams are growing on me, but these are a pass.
- Sep 7, 2002
- 7,810
- 6,974
Waiting for these to hit $100
- Jul 12, 2005
- 1,462
- 12
Both pics are not taken in the same conditions (light, camera precision and angle), therefore the grooves and color don't come across the same way. The first pic is def. better looking though based on who took that pic.Originally Posted by Animal Thug1539
Not sure about these Black/Red pairs. I haven't seen them in person yet.
But in comparision to the eggplant foamposite pair's, here's the difference in mold between the 2009 & 2010 release:
2009 (courtesy of never wear them)
2010:
Notice the difference in the grooves and color...really pointless release (2010) IMO.
- Aug 6, 2001
- 12,885
- 2,739
Nah. I had both pairs in my hands before selling them. What you see in that pic depicting those grooves and shape is exactly how it looked in real life.
The shape is different, the grooves, the color etc. They're damn near 2 totally different pairs. Anybody with both can tell you the same.
The shape is different, the grooves, the color etc. They're damn near 2 totally different pairs. Anybody with both can tell you the same.
- Jan 9, 2004
- 2,612
- 27
I don't know what all the fuss is about...the 2010's look great regardless of the color and groove difference
- May 11, 2010
- 8,955
- 4,919
those orlando P.E. are so
- Dec 10, 2008
- 11,385
- 31
i'm thinking about getting a pair from swoosh
- May 11, 2010
- 8,955
- 4,919
are these still $120 on there?
