- Feb 2, 2008
- 40,919
- 47,069
Foamposite One Retro..Black/Red..the right way this time
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by ii0ii703 rico rob,
- Start date
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,048
- 24,223
yeah, da 2010's were a rush job.
- Jan 31, 2005
- 1,939
- 12
i missed on the 07 black red. i do like the 10 black/red. suprises me that these arent popular
- Jan 31, 2005
- 1,939
- 12
Originally Posted by KICKINHEADZ1010
Both pics are not taken in the same conditions (light, camera precision and angle), therefore the grooves and color don't come across the same way. The first pic is def. better looking though based on who took that pic.Originally Posted by Animal Thug1539
Not sure about these Black/Red pairs. I haven't seen them in person yet.
But in comparision to the eggplant foamposite pair's, here's the difference in mold between the 2009 & 2010 release:
2009 (courtesy of never wear them)
2010:
Notice the difference in the grooves and color...really pointless release (2010) IMO.
i always love NWTs pics. he could sell me on any shoe im sure
- Apr 3, 2009
- 1,267
- 10
Yeah that dude Never Wear Them, I notice mad people steal his pics on eBay. And if you ask me, the 09' eggplant release was the last truest Foamposite release in terms of originallity. The foampsoite as a shoe changed after that year, not sure why tho..
- Dec 29, 2007
- 795
- 45
I really hope so. I'll grab another pair. Wasn't too mad dropping 140 on em. I waited on the pearls and missed out
- Aug 3, 2009
- 6,797
- 10
Colorway is too simple to justify spending $200 on them, I would purchase for $100 or less.
- Jul 29, 2008
- 2,156
- 12
agree with you 100%
king x riece
Banned
- Oct 4, 2010
- 6,289
- 10
Yo the hype on the 09 eggplants KILLED it for dudes who have been rocking them before it was the "cool thing to do". Before then it was somewhat of a north eastern cult following you see a dude in the street rockin' a pair of foams dudes always give eachother a nod or something to show respect. Nowadays in NYC at least EVERYONE rocks them even females everyone out here is a "foam head" dudes don't even know who penny hardaway is or what the 1 cent logo is
sorry for the rant
- Apr 3, 2009
- 1,267
- 10
^I agree 100 son I seen it happen first hand. That '09 eggplant release brought the wrong crowd to the drinking pond. Smh.
king x riece
Banned
- Oct 4, 2010
- 6,289
- 10
remember when dudes just seen pics and didn't see the actual shoe in person yet and was like "idc eggozz >>>>>>> royals"
09 was the beginning of the end man
- Dec 25, 2003
- 43,259
- 28,577
Someone hit me when these drop to $100-$120.
- Oct 12, 2008
- 1,325
- 150
What he said
- Apr 20, 2003
- 1,546
- 10
WESTNYC.com has these for $150 right now call them up 212-787-8595 for phone orders or stop by they dropped the price yesterday i'm pretty sure they have most sizes
- Jul 29, 2008
- 2,156
- 12
yoo kickz, what is your take on both pairs that released, do you think they are exactly the same, or do one look better than the other?
for some reason i think the second release better, havent gotten a pair of them yet but my hoh cough drops dont look as fresh...
you think i can take them back to niketown and get a refund, or exchange with writing on the box? thanks for any info 96
for some reason i think the second release better, havent gotten a pair of them yet but my hoh cough drops dont look as fresh...
you think i can take them back to niketown and get a refund, or exchange with writing on the box? thanks for any info 96
bigj505
Staff member
- Jan 23, 2007
- 42,583
- 21,804
^^^ they have different production dates. cant remember if the style number is the same but it should be.
i doubt the employee will look at the date tho. he/she usually just looks at the shoe size and puts them back in the box.
i doubt the employee will look at the date tho. he/she usually just looks at the shoe size and puts them back in the box.
- Apr 20, 2003
- 1,546
- 10
i mentioned it before there is no difference watsoever on the releases they are exactly the same that's why i didn't mind trading my worn pair for those AF1 Foams in black i'm waiting for them to go on sale so i can swoosh it for less than a buck, but if you have two pairs you can just switch out the box if it has writing on it...other than that i think you'll have a problem worst case if you go w/o a receipt they'll just give you the gift card which is still a win
- Jul 29, 2008
- 2,156
- 12
thanks yall.. i called niketown and explained but said she cant really say over the phone she would have to see the product...
if i cant exchange that pair i will just have to get another pair and take back the size ten in that 9.5 box...
i might be bugging but the recent releases looks better imo.. thanks again
if i cant exchange that pair i will just have to get another pair and take back the size ten in that 9.5 box...
i might be bugging but the recent releases looks better imo.. thanks again
- Apr 3, 2008
- 6,367
- 40
of course theyre the same EXACT thing
maybe different production dates, maybe not. Nike couldve simply had all of these sitting in a warehouse. Releases somewhat limited #s early just for Ntowns and HOHs and then released the rest later on...this is a usual technique done by Nike...release some early in limited #s and then GR release
i.e black/purple barkleys, army foams, black/red uptempos, etc.
maybe different production dates, maybe not. Nike couldve simply had all of these sitting in a warehouse. Releases somewhat limited #s early just for Ntowns and HOHs and then released the rest later on...this is a usual technique done by Nike...release some early in limited #s and then GR release
i.e black/purple barkleys, army foams, black/red uptempos, etc.
bigj505
Staff member
- Jan 23, 2007
- 42,583
- 21,804
^^^^ definitely have different production dates. i checked my pair before i sent it back to nike for a full refund and got the newer ones on discount
team orange 95s, griffs, barkleys, etc all have different production dates than the original retros
team orange 95s, griffs, barkleys, etc all have different production dates than the original retros
- Apr 3, 2008
- 6,367
- 40
^ didnt say they had exact production. i said maybe they do,maybe they dont.
since i havent picked up the newer releases, copped HOH release 2x on ea 50
all those shoes you mentioned may have different production dates, but the point of my last post was saying Nike tends to release limited #s first run, and then a wider release later on down the road, months later or even a year later.
all those shoes you mentioned may have different production dates, but the point of my last post was saying Nike tends to release limited #s first run, and then a wider release later on down the road, months later or even a year later.
bigj505
Staff member
- Jan 23, 2007
- 42,583
- 21,804
i get u joe. just was confirming that there is a different production date.
- Apr 3, 2008
- 6,367
- 40
- May 15, 2003
- 56,921
- 66,293
Originally Posted by UPandCOMING32
thanks. different dates or no,same EXACT shoe to me. dont know what differences there can possibly be,its a black upper and red sole
You never know with Nike. Look what they did with the 2009 and 2010 eggplants.
- Apr 20, 2003
- 1,546
- 10
Purp you already know wat you gotta do u just said it
and go a few pages back i def said they have diffierent dates, but there is no difference i repeat no difference watsoever they all have the same flaws that vary from pair to pair where the grooves don't sink in as much glue spots and weird toe boxes something we can do absolutely nothing about
and go a few pages back i def said they have diffierent dates, but there is no difference i repeat no difference watsoever they all have the same flaws that vary from pair to pair where the grooves don't sink in as much glue spots and weird toe boxes something we can do absolutely nothing about
