ohdannyboy
Banned
- 5,465
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
^ You serious?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by ohdannyboy
Originally Posted by TennHouse2
wat kind of logic is that? True if the dog was on a leash it maybe wouldnt have happened depending on how close the dogs got (we know the owner couldnt stop them if they started running) but we no 100% this wouldnt have happened had those dogs had a muzzle......how can u possibly put no blame on the owner of the pit? There are stray dogs running around everywhere, if your dog cant handle that, then it has to have a muzzleOriginally Posted by ohdannyboy
^ Nah brah. Had the little dog been on a leash, this would've never happened. Therefore it's the others owners fault.
The little dog ran up on the two pits. The pit owner is walking her dogs on a leash and some other dog just runs up on them, what the $!#$ did you want them to do? I'm sorry, but the lady and her pits were minding their own business. And mybe the pit owner couldnt have controlled the dogs, but had the little dog been on a leash, its owner could EASILY control it and pick it up if need be. You just dont let a dog roam. If a guy runs up on you and your boys at a bar talking reckless, are you just gonna let that slide?
Originally Posted by heirjordan15
I might be one of the only ones but I do not have any sympathy for the poodle or the owner of the poodle. Ok maybe a little for the owner but those kind of dogs should have never been bred and domesticated in the first place. They're useless animals. Anyone who buys one loses my respect if they even had it in the first place.
![]()
idk how to post gifs
good, because that was terrible.
maybe you forget how to post while you're at it.
Again... what kind of logic is this? As a dog owner, you need to be able to control your animal at all times when out in public. What if it was a little boy that ran up to the pits and he got mauled? It was the little boy's parents fault for not putting the kid in a stroller?Originally Posted by ohdannyboy
Originally Posted by TennHouse2
wat kind of logic is that? True if the dog was on a leash it maybe wouldnt have happened depending on how close the dogs got (we know the owner couldnt stop them if they started running) but we no 100% this wouldnt have happened had those dogs had a muzzle......how can u possibly put no blame on the owner of the pit? There are stray dogs running around everywhere, if your dog cant handle that, then it has to have a muzzleOriginally Posted by ohdannyboy
^ Nah brah. Had the little dog been on a leash, this would've never happened. Therefore it's the others owners fault.
The little dog ran up on the two pits. The pit owner is walking her dogs on a leash and some other dog just runs up on them, what the $!#$ did you want them to do? I'm sorry, but the lady and her pits were minding their own business. And mybe the pit owner couldnt have controlled the dogs, but had the little dog been on a leash, its owner could EASILY control it and pick it up if need be. You just dont let a dog roam. If a guy runs up on you and your boys at a bar talking reckless, are you just gonna let that slide?
Originally Posted by SunDOOBIE
Again... what kind of logic is this? As a dog owner, you need to be able to control your animal at all times when out in public. What if it was a little boy that ran up to the pits and he got mauled? It was the little boy's parents fault for not putting the kid in a stroller?Originally Posted by ohdannyboy
Originally Posted by TennHouse2
wat kind of logic is that? True if the dog was on a leash it maybe wouldnt have happened depending on how close the dogs got (we know the owner couldnt stop them if they started running) but we no 100% this wouldnt have happened had those dogs had a muzzle......how can u possibly put no blame on the owner of the pit? There are stray dogs running around everywhere, if your dog cant handle that, then it has to have a muzzle
The little dog ran up on the two pits. The pit owner is walking her dogs on a leash and some other dog just runs up on them, what the $!#$ did you want them to do? I'm sorry, but the lady and her pits were minding their own business. And mybe the pit owner couldnt have controlled the dogs, but had the little dog been on a leash, its owner could EASILY control it and pick it up if need be. You just dont let a dog roam. If a guy runs up on you and your boys at a bar talking reckless, are you just gonna let that slide?
Originally Posted by ohdannyboy
Cuz they're stupid?Originally Posted by TkTheGirl
I 'm just saying I'm confused why some of yall don't blame the pit bull owner as well.
Originally Posted by amel223
Cuz they're stupid?Originally Posted by TkTheGirl
I 'm just saying I'm confused why some of yall don't blame the pit bull owner as well.
They are rivals. The game is called Deep South's Oldest Rivalry.Originally Posted by AZwildcats
I thought Georgia and Auburn were rivals? I forgot what the game is called.
Worlds Largest Cocktail Party?
Originally Posted by amel223
No. The one thing you can't deny is had the little dog been on a leash, this would've never happened.
Originally Posted by TkTheGirl
Wow. Both are at fault though. BUT, how on earth would the pit bull owner mostly not be at fault? With dogs in general if another dog runs up on them, unless it attacks them first, there's no reason your dog should automatically start chopping on their necks.
Walking my pops dog in his neighborhood, which has a lot of strays and illegitimate dog owners, there's always some random dog running up to him. All Jordan (mastiff) does is sniff them maybe play for few seconds, and keep it moving. Maybe we just got a cool dog though, because he was attacked by 2 pits the third day we had him and he beat their %!@, made sure they left, looked up like"grab my leash woman", and we didn't skip a beat so...
I 'm just saying I'm confused why some of yall don't blame the pit bull owner as well.
Originally Posted by ohdannyboy
Originally Posted by amel223
Cuz they're stupid?Originally Posted by TkTheGirl
I 'm just saying I'm confused why some of yall don't blame the pit bull owner as well.
No. The one thing you can't deny is had the little dog been on a leash, this would've never happened.
Excuse you, that ***% scared the #*!% out of me I'm more than sure it happened and never walked him on that street again.Originally Posted by Frank Matthews
Originally Posted by TkTheGirl
Wow. Both are at fault though. BUT, how on earth would the pit bull owner mostly not be at fault? With dogs in general if another dog runs up on them, unless it attacks them first, there's no reason your dog should automatically start chopping on their necks.
Walking my pops dog in his neighborhood, which has a lot of strays and illegitimate dog owners, there's always some random dog running up to him. All Jordan (mastiff) does is sniff them maybe play for few seconds, and keep it moving. Maybe we just got a cool dog though, because he was attacked by 2 pits the third day we had him and he beat their %!@, made sure they left, looked up like"grab my leash woman", and we didn't skip a beat so...
I 'm just saying I'm confused why some of yall don't blame the pit bull owner as well.
that never happened.