- 2,328
- 2,078
I don't understand what your argument is. I must be a first level thinker, so help me out here.
The president gets reports on hundreds if not thousands of possible "threats". There is 0 evidence they had advanced knowledge that could have prevented 9/11, unless they simply evacuated the towers and pentagon permanently.
Using your analogy, what "weapons" did we give al-Qaeda for this "murder" ? Didn't you claim we "founded" al-Qaeda in the other Osama thread ? lol
Not being able to stop an attack (or taking advantage of it after the fact) =/= being complicit in a conspiracy.
The president gets reports on hundreds if not thousands of possible "threats". There is 0 evidence they had advanced knowledge that could have prevented 9/11, unless they simply evacuated the towers and pentagon permanently.
Using your analogy, what "weapons" did we give al-Qaeda for this "murder" ? Didn't you claim we "founded" al-Qaeda in the other Osama thread ? lol
Not being able to stop an attack (or taking advantage of it after the fact) =/= being complicit in a conspiracy.