Iron Man 3 (Movie Thread)-05/03/13 - New Trailer pg12 - Suits on Suits on Suits

Where is your review of IM3? 8o

I just....I dunno.

I remember last year, being just about the only one explaining how The Avengers was really not that great, and how basically all of the Marvel movies have been decent at best, so now that suddenly everyone's switching teams...I just pulled back from making a big *** Told You So review.

It was what it was, which is a regular Marvel movie. They really are, all the same. Just different flavors. And they're all more or less the same stretch between being too upbeat and popcorn for it's own good, and having just enough really good, grounded ideas, that you can feel the better movie it wanted to be, always. Half a step or so up from a Transformers thing, with a few, great, disconnected moments scattered around.

That's about it.

I don't know what people expected. There will never be a Marvel TDK, because that's not the type of movie they ever want to make.

They do darkness with the floodlights on. *shrug*

Let your anger flow. :lol

I see your point, and I know what you've been saying, but I thought Avengers at least was a step above this type film. Cap and IM2 didn't have much darkness, but Thor had a little in it, and IM 1 and Hulk certainly had a smidge, but I agree with your darkness/floodlight analogy. Wholeheartedly.

Is that Disney? Or just a lack of Nolan on Marvel's side? Because we know Bats was, and Supes appears to be on that same plane, is that the Nolan effect, or are DC comics just that much darker than Marvel comics?

I think it's just the fact that Iron Man set the foundation in 08. Ever since then, every one of these has been in that mold of punchlines and PG pretending to be adult and make sure they all feel like it's the same world and setting up for some...thing in the future.

You can't do that. Look at LOTR: The Two Towers. The first half of that movie is trash. Almost everything outside of Iron Man has been like that first half of Two Towers. They've been been leaning on hype and hope and anticipation for the future. And when you do that, by default, you're kinda saying **** the present and the past. Look past all the issues, cuz something is coming. That's what Lost did for half a decade. With these Marvel movies, that was been The Avengers. It was okay if none of them were as good as the first Iron Man, because those after credits scenes were what it's really all about.

They didn't waste Red Skull or undermine the film. He's in the present now, so Avengers....The Earth stuff with Thor wasn't stupid. He ran into SHIELD, so Avengers....Incredible Hulk doesn't exist anymore? Doesn't matter. Avengers....Iron Man 2 was terrible? It's okay...Black Widow and Nick Fury--Avengers.

When they hired Kenneth Branagh and instead of a Shakespearean tragedy, it was that...that's was a sign. Even The Avengers was a lot more upbeat and soft than I would've expect from Joss Whedon. I mean, it's the most cheery, bubblegum thing, outside of Dr. Horrible, that he's done. and he did get his moments in, but there's just that layer of genericness. When it came out, I just thought of Avengers as a not terrible Transformers 3. Cuz that's what their aim is. And I'll admit...I almost talked myself into thinking...okay...Shane Black...that's a dark director. Maybe he'll get the training wheels off. But not really. He got more body bags than we're used to, but in the very first scene, I knew...okay, this is still the Marvel way.

I can't say it's Disney, because all of them were like this. All of them want to sell to kids, women and grandparents. So all of them are basically PG movies, that get worried when they go too long without a joke or get a little too PG-13.

I think it's Spider-man. This is how Spidey did things, and that was the last successful comic book franchise, before Marvel's stuff started. *mind you TDK hadn't come out when they got the ball rolling in 06* But Sam Raimi is a master at keeping that balance. Shemping. And even he only managed it for 2 movies. And he didn't have to sell out villains and plotlines and stakes until the 3rd movie. That's what's really killing the Marvel films. Iron Man 3 wasn't the end of anything. It was just another Iron Man flick until the next thing he's in. Every Marvel movie has sold out except for the first Iron Man...I guess you could make a case for Captain America, even though the ending undermines the movie almost as much as recasting Banner killed Incredible Hulk.

The worst thing that happened to these Marvel movies is the Avengers Initiative. I have no doubt that left to his own devices, Kenneth Branagh could've made a really special Thor film. The Asgard stuff was really good for what it was. It's just the Earth/SHIELD/Hawkeye stuff that forced in, that was trash. Iron Man 2 might've been something, if you didn't KNOW they were holding back the real bad guy for IM3. And if they didn't shove in the Black Widow and Nick Fury stuff. And if they didn't have to hold back on Tony going full alchy cuz they needed him right for Avengers. Incredible Hulk just proved that they had no plans at all for it, except that they just wanted the character out there to use in the big teamup.

And because of the big teamup cemented for 2012, all of these movies had to get squeezed out right on time, no matter what.

I'm not saying they're really bad...except Iron Man 2. I'm just saying, this is why I haven't really cared much about all of these since I finished watching Thor. That's it? That's it. That's all they really wanna do. And maybe, just maybe they'll breakthrough somewhere and rise above. But I really doubt it.

They're good. That's all. Chris Nolan was an artist with a blank check, free reign and a huge character with an amazing past and rogue's gallery. These guys are all mercs told to paint inside the lines, so it'll be easier for the next guy to pick up where they left off. I think it just seems like they're doing big things, because DC and Warner's are so terrible and there's nothing else really to compare this thing to.

If TDKR hit how it was supposed to hit, it wouldn't even be a conversation. If there was any other game in town, it'd be easier to put these down. But there isn't. This entire Marvel Universe thing happened between TDK and TDKR, so they got to be the only comic book movies coming out for half a decade.. If your computer's not that great, but it's the only one you've got...and you're never around better ones, then it ain't so bad.

Just realized I wrote a lot and didn't even start to review IM3. :{

I'll put it like this...these are just better, classier Michael Bay movies, that are well casted, but forever handicapped. And Iron Man 3 was a big opportunity to break out of that mold, but nope. They are who I thought they were. And that's perfectly fine, but real regular to me.
 
Last edited:
8o They should want to distance themselves from Affleck's Daredevil as much as possible. :lol

Hell, Affleck's whole career now is forgetting everything after Good Will Hunting and before Gone Baby Gone. :lol

Someone hasn't seen the Daredevil director's cut. The studio ruined the theatrical cut with their intervening.

Affleck would make a great flick out of it IMO if Marvel backed him 100%
 
I agree with the gripe regarding Shield in Iron Man 2. That was about a good 45 minutes of the flick dedicated towards the Shield Initiative alone. It wasn't an IM movie. It was a Shield movie.

I'm hoping that Thor 2 gets as far away from Shield as possible.
All of them want to sell to kids, women and grandparents. So all of them are basically PG movies,
Basically most Hollywood movies now especially the comic genre the last few years sans Watchmen and Kick-***. Too busy trying to sell merchandise.
 
I agree Affleck career been whack between Good will and Gone baby hahaha.
And ya I'm not a huge fan of the Marvel movies. I mean ya I do like them, but its too preppy and too many jokes in them for me.
 
But Captain America was whack tho.
Just boring.
The only marvel movie (avenger characters) that was just dull to me.
This
Captain America has always been boring
I agree with everything posted so far that's why as a big Logan fan this new movie has me very apprehensive
Truly maybe besides deadpool, I wish they would give a tdk treatment to him because wolverine has always been a dark character( especially weapon x) but money talks
 
8o They should want to distance themselves from Affleck's Daredevil as much as possible. :lol

Hell, Affleck's whole career now is forgetting everything after Good Will Hunting and before Gone Baby Gone. :lol

Someone hasn't seen the Daredevil director's cut. The studio ruined the theatrical cut with their intervening.

I've seen it. And I know, it's much better than the theatrical.

But it's still not that great. The costume is still off and Affleck's still wrong for the part. Just, everything's a lot less bad is all. :lol

Affleck would make a great flick out of it IMO if Marvel backed him 100%

Maybe. But that guy is all about getting his cred up and forgetting the past. I don't think he's gonna be doing a superhero thing.


But Captain America was whack tho.
Just boring.
The only marvel movie (avenger characters) that was just dull to me.

Yea. The Cap movie is the most worthless to me. It's just a big nothing. Good beginning, good ending, bland, emotionless everything else. Just generic as hell. The only part that was even memorable was when the kid's like I'm cool Cap, I can swim.

It's a clean cut, straightforward little action movie, so I kinda get the people who like it.

Those people will never run out of new superhero movies they'll like.
 
Last edited:
Just saw the movie.

Movie was alright. Worth the money IMO
The madarin stuff :{


I liked captain america :o
 
Last edited:
It was a fun and enjoyable movie up until the mansion scene imo. I don't mind them altering The Mandarin but not in this fashion. Infiltrating the mansion with homemade gadgets was also a bit silly.
 
But Captain America was whack tho.
Just boring.
The only marvel movie (avenger characters) that was just dull to me.
Yea. The Cap movie is the most worthless to me. It's just a big nothing. Good beginning, good ending, bland, emotionless everything else. Just generic as hell. The only part that was even memorable was when the kid's like I'm cool Cap, I can swim.

It's a clean cut, straightforward little action movie, so I kinda get the people who like it.

Those people will never run out of new superhero movies they'll like.
that was the most memorable part of the film for you?!?! 
laugh.gif


But ya, I agree, great beginning and end. 2nd act was a borderline snooze fest.

However, I wouldn't say the movie was completely worthless since it introduced the Cosmic Cube and set that part up nicely for the Avengers.

I think the 2nd act kinda sucked because its hard to capture the heart and good will character of Capt in an exciting manner.

and yes, I think I fall into that catagory of people who will never run out of superhero movies I'll like....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yo, listen up here's a story
About a little guy
That lives in a blue world
And all day and all night
And everything he sees is just blue
Like him inside and outside




Blue his house
With a blue little window
And a blue corvette
And everything is blue for him
And himself and everybody around
Cause he ain't got nobody to listen to
 
just saw the movie tonight. saw it in 3D and D-Box to amp up the experience. And i STILL dont know how i feel about it. I agree, they referenced the avengers "nothing is the same since new york" idea too much. it was a pointless connection. some say it was to take tony stark down a peg which is why he kept
having nervous breakdowns in this movie. but then again, the nervous breakdowns were pointless! and theres something fundamentally wrong in the story. the "botanist" lady or whatever has been working on regeneration for 10+ years with the main villain. In all those years...she made everyone around her able to regenerate, but didnt do it to herself?

And if all these people can regenerate, them dying makes no sense. Dude in the airplane took a blast to the chest and died. Really? He BLEW UP 30 minutes ago and chewed gum... but hit him in the chest and its over? Same thing for the main villain. Ironman cut his arm off? Regenerates. Puts him in an iron suit, blows him up? He regenerates. The new superpowered pepper (which was just a terrible... TERRIBLE, and sexy...idea) blows one of iron mans gadgets up on the villain...and it kills him? WHAT!? Rhodes kills 2 of em by having them fall into an explosion. WHAT?!
i dunno, those things in the plot made no sense to me. and honestly made the movie hard to just flat out say it was great.
 
this movie sucked.. wasnt worth the price... storyline sucked, they destroyed the mandarin, which means no appearance of fin fang foom.

no magic rings for mandarin, just some lame guy playing mandarin.. the fact that they put more tony stark in the movie than iron man...

iron patriot? sorry, but i was not impressed.. besides, james rhodes was never iron patriot, it was norman osborn..

and close to the end, when all the ironman suits came to help.. it would have been sweet if the real war machine armor would have showed up.

they made the movie more of a comedy... like most of you guys have said, it should have a more darker side... but that wont happen..

that is why imo the best marvel so far is still blade and blade 2..
 
just saw the movie tonight. saw it in 3D and D-Box to amp up the experience. And i STILL dont know how i feel about it. I agree, they referenced the avengers "nothing is the same since new york" idea too much. it was a pointless connection. some say it was to take tony stark down a peg which is why he kept
having nervous breakdowns in this movie. but then again, the nervous breakdowns were pointless! and theres something fundamentally wrong in the story. the "botanist" lady or whatever has been working on regeneration for 10+ years with the main villain. In all those years...she made everyone around her able to regenerate, but didnt do it to herself?

And if all these people can regenerate, them dying makes no sense. Dude in the airplane took a blast to the chest and died. Really? He BLEW UP 30 minutes ago and chewed gum... but hit him in the chest and its over? Same thing for the main villain. Ironman cut his arm off? Regenerates. Puts him in an iron suit, blows him up? He regenerates. The new superpowered pepper (which was just a terrible... TERRIBLE, and sexy...idea) blows one of iron mans gadgets up on the villain...and it kills him? WHAT!? Rhodes kills 2 of em by having them fall into an explosion. WHAT?!
i dunno, those things in the plot made no sense to me. and honestly made the movie hard to just flat out say it was great.
Okay, I guess you didn't pick up the Extremis comic series once in your life time. The botanist lady was Maya Hansan. She developed the the virus, but refused to use it because it was unstable. Which is why it kept blowing up in the movie. 

The dude who got hit in the chest and died was hit with a repulsor beam, which is very powerful. It's more powerful than the explosion, which he did survive. Keep in mind he was about as far from the blast as Happy was. Which is why they both survived. 

It isn't hard to kill extremis infected people, but they survive injuries like limb loss fairly easily. An explosion will stop them, as will a repulsor blast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jjs
Very interesting Sir Charles,

I like comics books and the marvel universe, but I don't know much since I barely read any. Is it with that virus that Starks uses to create his own extremis? (when he has his suit inside him?) Do you think he's going to do this in avengers 2? What's up with him removing his thing in his heart, Anything related to some comic book?

Sorry if I said anything stupid :lol
I hope someone can answer my questions.
 
Last edited:
Very interesting Sir Charles,

I like comics books and the marvel universe, but I don't know much since I barely read any. Is it with that virus that Starks uses to create his own extremis? (when he has his suit inside him?) Do you think he's going to do this in avengers 2? What's up with him removing his thing in his heart, Anything related to some comic book?

Sorry if I said anything stupid
I hope someone can answer my questions.
The arc reactor does not power Tony Stark despite popular belief. It was created to make an electromagnetic field to stop the shrapnel from reaching his heart. The suits are powered by their own reactors, which is how they can work as suits and drones at the same time. With modern technology, he was able to get heart surgery to remove the shrapnel which was only an inch away from his heart. This was done shortly before the Extremis comic series.

In the comic series, he uses extremis. He alters it to work with the Iron Man suit, which allows him to have all the cool features. The suit itself is not inside of him, but the underlying skin suit is. Which is what he has to put on to control the suit. They did not add that in any of the movies. He would have to put on a skin suit, then put on the iron man suit. Then, after extremis, he could control the pieces telepathically. Which allows him to move each piece of the suit with his mind, which they added in the movie. Which is stupid because he didn't use the virus.

With the ending of the movie, I think he may alter extremis. Seeing he had to in order to fix Pepper. He will probably have to inject himself at one point to save his life. So it is possible that we will see the Bleeding Edge armor in Avengers 2. Which is the upgraded extremis armor. 

200px-Iron_Man_bleeding_edge.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom