Mr.Guy
formerly timidtebow
- 23,944
- 8,608
How does a stranger in passing know his name?did you hear da guy's name?
being oblivious of what's going on isn't a excuse.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How does a stranger in passing know his name?did you hear da guy's name?
being oblivious of what's going on isn't a excuse.
i told u bout that white & da same for da black category years ago.The changes to the census are needed. We will be able to examine disparities better. In the past Latinos who identified as White on the census often muddied up social scientific data because their data is recorded in the White section. Some scholars say Latino inclusion brings down the averages of white wealth stats, poverty numbers etc. Without latinos in white section disparities may be more alarming.
The Census is flawed though. Doesn't count everyone and people often pick categories that don't represent them. It's just an estimate.i told u bout that white & da same for da black category years ago.
Exactly you can be Black and Latino at the same time.I don't have a problem which one you promote; nationality, ethnicity or race. I don't even care about people denying their race for another (for the most part). When you start denying a race and substituting it with an ethnicity, you just seem foolish because they're not the same thing.
"I'm not Black, I'm Jamacain" is as dumb as "I'm not American, I'm a male". Theses aren't mutually exclusive things.
I wonder what these disparities would look like if you separated white people apart like that? Say give Jewish people or Irish or Italian, etc. their own classification. Or Sub Saharan African, etc.The changes to the census are needed. We will be able to examine disparities better. In the past Latinos who identified as White on the census often muddied up social scientific data because their data is recorded in the White section. Some scholars say Latino inclusion brings down the averages of white wealth stats, poverty numbers etc. Without latinos in white section disparities may be more alarming.
Elaborate on how I'm wrong. I have a "black" father and a "Puerto Rican" mother. One parent is darker skinned and one is of the lighter variety. Am I not allowed to identify as a "black boricua" [emoji]9994[/emoji][emoji]127997[/emoji] ? Am I wrong for that sir ?
YeaI wonder what these disparities would look like if you separated white people apart like that? Say give Jewish people or Irish or Italian, etc. their own classification. Or Sub Saharan African, etc.
Correct me if I am wrong, but "Latino" refers to a cultural orientation, where "black" is really just a catch all for anyone who has certain physical characteristics, the same as "white".
The Census is flawed though. Doesn't count everyone and people often pick categories that don't represent them. It's just an estimate.i told u bout that white & da same for da black category years ago.
It is 2017, he can claim anything he wants, word to:You missed my point. So what's your race then? Black is not an ethnicity and Puerto Rican is not a race.
You missed my point. So what's your race then? Black is not an ethnicity and Puerto Rican is not a race.
To be honest with you I've always struggled with filling out applications like these
View media item 2402387
But have no issue with clear and concise ones like these
View media item 2402388
I know that. Since I missed your point do me a favor and break it down a lil more for a brotha
So those Black girls represent ALL black people? Find me a study that proves that Black Americans aren't inclusive. If you would read a damn book you would realize the historical background of the racial term BLack and why black folk often prefer the term Black over colored, AA etc. It's a more inclusive term to include our brothers and sisters around the globe. Scholars write about this stuff I'm not just making it up and it isn't based on anecdotal evidence like you've used.
I wouldn't blame black folk for self-hating latinos though. Colonialism def is at faultI didn't say they represent all black people, just how NH doesn't represent all Latinos....what I'm saying is that NO racial group is free of being prejudice, plenty of times I've witnessed blacks isolate and exclude Latinos even if they are darker than them....simply because even though they share the same skin color, they are two completely different cultures, so is ok for a black Latino to be driven towards their Latin roots over their black skin.
Soooo...race = black, ethnicity = aa/pr.
Back to my original point. For somebody to say half black half pr doesn't make sense cuz once again ethnicity =/= race.
Edit: it's OD technical and most won't bat an eye if you say it but that was the whole argument before a couple pages back. I didn't make this **** up
I wouldn't blame black folk for self-hating latinos though. Colonialism def is at fault
I've recognized certain people have agendas or have been consistently negative towards the black community (specifically our women) for a decade on this forum.
I've recognized certain people have agendas or have been consistently negative towards the black community (specifically our women) for a decade on this forum.