“Houthis shooting indiscriminately at ships!!! The world economy!!!!”
This a strawman argument, because this distortion has nothing to do with anything I said. This is just more propaganda in furtherance of your next strawman fallacy.
Wow. So only 2-4% of all ships have been targeted since this started.
This is also a strawman argument. At no point does this have any relevance whatsoever to any aspect of my argument. You're shouting a completely different argument in the void.
Wow. Very indiscriminate. Shooting anything that moves. Those animals. Free Israel.
Good job, you managed to cram 4 strawman arguments in just this one part. Really outdoing yourself.
None of what you said has any relevance to what I said or believe. Each and every single aspect of this post is false propaganda you made up because you're too immature to have an actual discussion.
In one of the previous posts, I even specifically laid out some of my general views to pre-empt the strawman delusions you'd likely come up with. As is displayed here though, you lack the maturity to even process that thought. Or the willingness.
I expect you'll just do the same again, and I'll leave you to it, but in case anyone is dumb and illiterate enough to actually listen to a word of your delusional drivel in this post:
#1: I strongly believe Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians. This is imo the most important global conflict that has to be dealt with.
#2: All countries supplying weapons and/or other forms of military aid to the Israeli government are aiding in this genocide
#3: All countries refusing to push back or outright supporting Israeli's pro-genocide propaganda are indirectly supporting the genocide
#4: Targeting civilians is never ok
#4 was the central point of my disagreement with the Houthis, because they targeted civilians. I made that clear numerous times.
You of course were continually too immature, delusional and propaganda-minded to be able to comprehend that.
america and israel bad, targeting civilians bad
houthi target civilian, therefore bad but obviously not as bad as genocide
Is that more of a level of you're able comprehend? Do I need to dumb it down further? Maybe an MS Paint drawing?
Notice how those views are a direct contradiction to everything you falsely accuse me of, despite clearly and coherently laying out my views several times?
My response to the Houthis targeting civilians was condemnation, yours was to blame the civilians and conjure up a bunch of delusional lies about me.
To me that
sounds like you're too much of a coward to stand behind your alleged view of caring about civilians. So consumed by a propagandized view that your replies indicated a willingness to
almost outright support targeting civilians if the ones doing it are anti Israeli genocide.
Notice how I said that "sounds like..." instead of explicitly accusing you? That's how an adult handles conversation. Not by going on a schizophrenic rant shouting propaganda at the void, but through calm and coherent dialogue.
Enough of this nonsense. I think at this point it would only insult the seriousness of the topic to continue arguing with a petulant child with no grasp of critical thinking, no reading comprehension and a complete inability to handle any type of discussion. Let alone a discussion about a topic like this, which deserves better than to be defiled by lies, propaganda and delusional drivel.
