- Jul 16, 2017
- 22,597
- 16,319
Crazy videos from Iran coming out. They have such fasicst police…
Oh wait nevermind. I’m told this is America
Oh wait nevermind. I’m told this is America
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe, maybe it could just be that French laws surrounding the identification of crime suspects/victims in media outlets might be different from US laws? Could it be that the due process laws in France might be different from US laws?I found like 5-10 articles on this incident and not one mentioned any names.
Le Figaro and Le Parisien are fake news now? They also covered the story.Crazy how fast and far fake news travel, especially when it comes to supposed antisemitism.
Not saying she is wrong here but don't believe everything that Twitter user says. She's a known wacko. Certainly has an agenda.
Yea posters like Dr Anastasia were useful for the first 3-4 months of the conflict bc all they did was post videos from Gaza uploaded by palestinians so they really spread the word. Now that war has shifted to an advanced game of misinformation and war tactics they aren’t as useful. In fact I personally unfollowed a lot of them in lieu of intelligence officers (Ritter. Mcgregor) now filling up my feed and independent journalists debunking Israeli hasbara (Blumenthal, mate) and foreign news channels that present facts from the ground overseas.Not saying she is wrong here but don't believe everything that Twitter user says. She's a known wacko. Certainly has an agenda.
The NBC article is from March 6, but the UN published this a few days later:
Reasonable Grounds to Believe Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Occurred in Israel During 7 October Attacks, Senior UN Official Tells Security Council | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases
There are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence — including rape and gang-rape — occurred across multiple locations of Israel and the Gaza periphery during the attacks on 7 October 2023, a senior United Nations official reported to the Security Council today, as she...press.un.org
Are you sure your sources aren't doctoring the screenshots too?
Note that this question isn't a denial that pro-Israeli propaganda happens.
The team also found convincing information that sexual violence was committed against hostages, and has reasonable grounds to believe that such violence may still be ongoing against those in captivity. While there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred in the Nova music festival site, Route 232, and kibbutz Re’im, reported incidents of rape could not be verified in other locations. Concurrently, the team determined that at least two allegations of sexual violence in kibbutz Be’eri — widely reported in the media — were unfounded.
I'm pretty familiar with french press, thanks.Maybe, maybe it could just be that French laws surrounding the identification of crime suspects/victims in media outlets might be different from US laws? Could it be that the due process laws in France might be different from US laws?
Le Figaro and Le Parisien are fake news now? They also covered the story.
It's concerning that some of you don't realize the information loop you're stuck in, to the point where you'll refuse to accept that there are people who support Palestine AND who want to get revenge on Jews and their sympathizers. ITT, I haven't seen any news on the numerous ceasefire proposals that have been put on the table and rejected by Hamas.
Always on some "y'all don't read, you Hamas advocates" when they're the ones eating up zionist propaganda like a fat kid loves cake.Lol
Don’t engage with the trolls
Let them live in the “politics thread” where they all cover their ears of any genocide talk bc they are so worried their cult will lose in November.
There's campaigns by Israel to keep pushing this.
Did you read the report?
From what you posted:
Pamila Patten's crew that went in to look into this did not have an investigative mandate. She had asked Israel to allow the UN to investigate Israel's claims on some mass rape event on October 7, but they have been refusing to cooperate. Read past the click bait headlines.
Their conclusion of the report is based on second-hand testimonies, not first-hand accounts and they never identified ONE victim from the day of October 7.
Pramila Patten, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict, led an official visit to Israel from 29 January to 14 February to gather, analyse and verify reports of sexual violence related to the 7 October attack.
Is that the definition of "second hand source?"What I witnessed in Israel were scenes of unspeakable violence perpetrated with shocking brutality,” Ms. Patten recalled. Detailing her methodology, she said that her team met with families of hostages and members of communities displaced from several kibbutzim. It conducted confidential interviews with 34 individuals, including survivors and witnesses of the 7 October attacks, released hostages, first responders and health and service providers. It visited four attack sites — as well as the morgue to which the bodies of victims were transferred — and reviewed over 5,000 photographic images and some 50 hours of footage of the attacks.
Did YOU read the report?
Is that the definition of "second hand source?"
I am under no illusion that Israel is exaggerating certain claims in the war to capture the narrative. What I'm not gonna do is pretend that Hamas is not using propaganda to paint themselves in a favorable light. Neither am I going to ignore that you willingly engage in it too, when you selectively rearrange and reinterpret the words of UN representatives to build a narrative that exonerates the Gaza government (because that's what Hamas was, whether you like it or not).
You can't have it both ways: you can't say "UN bad" when they uncover evidence of SA during the Oct 7th attacks, and say "UN good" because they looked the other way while the tunnels were built. The reason I posted that UN-published article in the first place was to challenge the assertion that the UN found no evidence of rape on Oct 7th. But I suppose challenging the other side's propaganda makes me a Zionist and a troll.
We need a lot more truth and pragmatism around here.
I am very critical of the UN. It is really not practical and used as leverage by the most powerful states an entities for their self-interested goals, and even pushes neo-colonial and imperialist missions. But, at times, you do have certain units in the UN that do provide accurate or genuine missions. You just have to research on the credibility of the unit and the leads on those reports.
I very clearly explained why I posted that particular article. Go back to the post I replied to, look at the NBC screenshot with the highlighted text, look at the date, and look at the date of the UN press release I quoted. By the way, the report DID come to that conclusion:You had presented the UN report to share as it is a smoking gun to back Israel's claims of mass & widespread sexual assault on October 7, but the report never comes to that conclusion and had no investigative mandate.
“It was a catalogue of the most extreme and inhumane forms of killing, torture and other horrors,” including sexual violence, she stated. The team also found convincing information that sexual violence was committed against hostages, and has reasonable grounds to believe that such violence may still be ongoing against those in captivity.
However, she underscored that her findings do not legitimize further hostilities. Instead, they create a moral imperative for a humanitarian ceasefire to end the unspeakable suffering imposed on Palestinian civilians in Gaza and bring about the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. “I am horrified by the injustice of women and children killed in Gaza,” she said, stressing that the end goal of her mandate is not “a war without rape” but a “world without war”.
Second hand testimonies are any person other than the victim themselves, who are the first-hand/primary source. Again, that report provided no clear verified evidence, other than second-hand/relayed evidence. Basically just he said/she said, and no forensic evidence either.
It conducted confidential interviews with 34 individuals, including survivors and witnesses of the 7 October attacks, released hostages, first responders and health and service providers.
Propaganda is used by any party, and all the time, but we need to assess the manipulation and to what extent, especially it is manufactured to commit a genocide.
Seems like a no brainer
Obviously Israel/US isn’t going to accept