Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Originally Posted by Durden7
MLB doesnt test for every kind of PED.
Im sure OKB has some sort of stat that trys to prove that Brady Anderson was a statistical oddity.
Brady, was probably a combination of both.
Steroids CAN'T make a journeyman into a 50 HR hitter, they aren't magic beans.
Especially Bautista and his skinny 190 pond frame identical to the size he was in Pitt.Spoiler [+]
Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Originally Posted by Durden7
MLB doesnt test for every kind of PED.
Im sure OKB has some sort of stat that trys to prove that Brady Anderson was a statistical oddity.
Brady, was probably a combination of both.
Steroids CAN'T make a journeyman into a 50 HR hitter, they aren't magic beans.
Especially Bautista and his skinny 190 pond frame identical to the size he was in Pitt.Spoiler [+]
Me too but then I saw that he hit 3 todayOriginally Posted by ChicagoKid23
i thought he was gonna fall off and hit like 13 HR's this year
good for him tho
Me too but then I saw that he hit 3 todayOriginally Posted by ChicagoKid23
i thought he was gonna fall off and hit like 13 HR's this year
good for him tho
thats where your theory is flawed.Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
My logic is simply impenetrable on this one, it would be silly to assume that it is steroids.
Just because you are uninformed about what makes a duck a duck doesn't make it a duck....uh..yeah.
Looks the same size to me.
I don't buy the steroids, not enough evidence.
EDIT:
Actually no evidence really.
thats where your theory is flawed.Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
My logic is simply impenetrable on this one, it would be silly to assume that it is steroids.
Just because you are uninformed about what makes a duck a duck doesn't make it a duck....uh..yeah.
Looks the same size to me.
I don't buy the steroids, not enough evidence.
EDIT:
Actually no evidence really.
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
So if a guy simply adds more of an uppercut to his swing this is the result, the second coming of Albert Pujols? Right...
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
So if a guy simply adds more of an uppercut to his swing this is the result, the second coming of Albert Pujols? Right...
I understand this, I was just using other peoples logic against them, posting before anf after pictures seems to be an unreliable measure of PED use and it seems you agree with me.Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
thats where your theory is flawed.Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
My logic is simply impenetrable on this one, it would be silly to assume that it is steroids.
Just because you are uninformed about what makes a duck a duck doesn't make it a duck....uh..yeah.
Looks the same size to me.
I don't buy the steroids, not enough evidence.
EDIT:
Actually no evidence really.
Juicing doesnt necessarily make an athlete bigger , it helps you at whatever you train for. Track & Field sprinters use PEDs and they dont do it to get bigger, they do it to get faster.
if a hitter with Warning trrack power juiced, it turns those Fly balls into Homer runs and wall shots.
btw, you're looking in the wrong spot, an athletes base is his legs, and if he would want to make himself stronger and increase speed and endurance the biggest change would be his mid area and lower half
I understand this, I was just using other peoples logic against them, posting before anf after pictures seems to be an unreliable measure of PED use and it seems you agree with me.Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
thats where your theory is flawed.Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
My logic is simply impenetrable on this one, it would be silly to assume that it is steroids.
Just because you are uninformed about what makes a duck a duck doesn't make it a duck....uh..yeah.
Looks the same size to me.
I don't buy the steroids, not enough evidence.
EDIT:
Actually no evidence really.
Juicing doesnt necessarily make an athlete bigger , it helps you at whatever you train for. Track & Field sprinters use PEDs and they dont do it to get bigger, they do it to get faster.
if a hitter with Warning trrack power juiced, it turns those Fly balls into Homer runs and wall shots.
btw, you're looking in the wrong spot, an athletes base is his legs, and if he would want to make himself stronger and increase speed and endurance the biggest change would be his mid area and lower half
You didn't read the whole post or the links in the post, Bautista always hit well when he pulled, .960 OPS when hitting to his pull side his whole career, he adjust his approached became a dead pull hitter(only like 1 of his 54 homers last year was to opposite field, also changed his swing to the point where he is an extreme fly ball hitter.Originally Posted by dland24
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
So if a guy simply adds more of an uppercut to his swing this is the result, the second coming of Albert Pujols? Right...
Thinking Bautista "simply added more of an uppercut" is as laughable a comment as any comment in this thread though.
You didn't read the whole post or the links in the post, Bautista always hit well when he pulled, .960 OPS when hitting to his pull side his whole career, he adjust his approached became a dead pull hitter(only like 1 of his 54 homers last year was to opposite field, also changed his swing to the point where he is an extreme fly ball hitter.Originally Posted by dland24
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
So if a guy simply adds more of an uppercut to his swing this is the result, the second coming of Albert Pujols? Right...
Thinking Bautista "simply added more of an uppercut" is as laughable a comment as any comment in this thread though.
