- Apr 27, 2002
- 3,717
- 3,472
I really loathe the idea that there was a choice to be had that wouldn't realistically result in death.
Imagine being put in an environment where there are fences around you, people standing outside that fence with the mission to capture or kill you if you run away, and the only thing you have in common with the people in captivity with you being the color of your skin. That is, your fellow slaves don't understand your language and you don't understand theirs, you have different customs, and probably different understanding of life. Let's also add that you don't know much about life beyond the property; you're not even supposed to be able to read, write and navigate this new world. Slave life was designed to isolate its subjects.
The most successful slave revolt resulted in the independence of the first black nation (Haiti) and a concerted effort by the US, France, Spain, and other slave nations to isolate Haiti until it paid back what France had lost by losing their portion of Hispaniola, which Haiti did for 200 years.
Where was the choice, other than surviving?
framing it as a choice is just an absolutist argument, made worse by the fact that it isn’t thought out or even making any argument really; not that there is much of an argument there anyways...it’s just an ill-conceived rationale, that said while initially the semantics of it are shocking, the absurdness is moreso ignoring the context of the “choice” than calling it that...